HomeAboutusEditorial BoardCurrent issuearchivesSearch articlesInstructions for authorsSubscription detailsAdvertise

  Login  | Users online: 7747

   Ahead of print articles    Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size  


 
 Table of Contents    
ORIGINAL ARTICLE  
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 46  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 421-424
 

A review of maternal near miss cases in selected Hospitals in North-East India


1 Department of Community Medicine, NEIGRIHMS, Shillong, Meghalaya, India
2 Department of Community Medicine, RIMS, Imphal, Manipur, India

Date of Submission10-Jun-2020
Date of Acceptance21-Apr-2022
Date of Web Publication13-Oct-2021

Correspondence Address:
Prof. Brogen Singh Akoijam
Department of Community Medicine, RIMS, Imphal - 795 004, Manipur
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijcm.IJCM_476_20

Rights and Permissions

 

   Abstract 


Background: The major causes of maternal near miss (MNM) and maternal death (MD) are similar, so review of MNM cases is likely to yield valuable information regarding severe morbidity, which, if untreated may lead to maternal mortality. Objectives: The objective is to determine frequency of near miss cases and identify the risk factors associated with MNM. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was done from June 2015 to October 2017 in three hospitals in Manipur and Nagaland. All cases of MNM, which occurred during this period, were included and were reviewed using their records. Family members and health care providers of 9 recent cases were interviewed. Data collected were coded and relevant themes were identified. Results: There were 32,110 deliveries, 147 near miss cases and 12 MDs, resulting in maternal mortality ratio of 38/100,000 live birth (LB), severe maternal outcome ratio of 5/1000 LB and MNM ratio of 4.6/1000 LB. MNM to mortality ratio was 12.2:1 and mortality index was 7.5%. 83% of the cases of MNM were pregnancy related while 15.6% were related to preexisting disorders. The three delays remain the decisive factors in maternal mortality. Conclusion: Most of the near miss cases experienced delay in decision to seek health care, which resulted from underestimating the severity of various pregnancy-related conditions. Poor knowledge of the risk of warning signs of pregnancy plays a major part in the delay of management.


Keywords: Delays, maternal death, maternal near miss, mortality index, North-East India, severe maternal outcome ratio


How to cite this article:
Visi V, Akoijam BS. A review of maternal near miss cases in selected Hospitals in North-East India. Indian J Community Med 2021;46:421-4

How to cite this URL:
Visi V, Akoijam BS. A review of maternal near miss cases in selected Hospitals in North-East India. Indian J Community Med [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Dec 3];46:421-4. Available from: https://www.ijcm.org.in/text.asp?2021/46/3/421/328177





   Introduction Top


Maternal mortality has been used to evaluate and improve the quality of maternal health care in many countries. Since 1990, MMR has declined by 45% worldwide, and most of the reduction has occurred since 2000.[1] At the country level, in India, the MMR status is at 130 (2014-2016) a decline from 437/100,000 live births (LBs) in 1990.[2] Despite the global progress made, India (17%) and Nigeria (14%) accounted for one third of global maternal deaths (MDs) and missed the target set by MDG 5, i.e., MMR <150/lakh LBs.[3] The global MDG targets thus not achieved, now the task has been taken over by sustainable development goals, Goal 3 (Target 3.1) which has set a global target to reduce MMR to <70/lakh LBs by 2030.[4]

Women who survive life-threatening conditions arising from complications related to pregnancy and childbirth have many common aspects with those who die of such complications and this similarity led to the development of the near-miss concept in maternal health. Hence, the notion of maternal near miss review was introduced in maternal health care to complement information obtained with review of MDs.[5]

Near miss cases are more common than MDs.[6] Moreover, the major reasons and causes are same for both, so review of MNM cases is likely to yield valuable information regarding severe morbidity, which, if untreated may lead to maternal mortality. Thus, this study was planned to determine the frequency of MNM and identify the risk factors of MNM.


   Materials and Methods Top


A cross-sectional study was conducted from June 2015 to October 2017 in two tertiary teaching hospital in Manipur and one hospital in Nagaland, catering to patients coming with serious complications in almost all of Manipur and Nagaland, respectively. The study population were MNM cases identified from the records. Cases were those who met minimum 3 criteria– one from clinical findings (either signs or symptoms), investigations and interventions done or any single criterion, which signifies cardio respiratory collapse, according to the National Health Mission MNM-Review Operational Guidelines 2014.[7]

Sample size and sampling

All cases of Near-Miss which occurred in the 1½-year period were included for calculating frequency of MNM. Nine cases were identified and interviewed face to face for more details considering the different geographical spread of the states – Urban, Rural, and Hill area. Interview was conducted at the time of discharge of the women. The questions explored were: efforts to seek care, accessibility of health services and problems encountered during the management of cases. Any unclear information was clarified with the respondents.

Data handling and analysis

A data abstraction form was used. Information included socio-demographic background, reproductive characteristics and maternal outcome. Collected data were entered into IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows,Version 21.0.IBM Corp. Armonk, NY). For quantitative analysis, descriptive statistics such as mean, standard deviation, and percentages were used. For Qualitative analysis data collected were coded and relevant themes were identified.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional ethics committee in RIMS, Imphal. Permission for the study in Jawaharlal Nehru Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal and Naga Hospital Authority, Kohima, before the beginning of the study, were obtained from the concerned authority.


   Results Top


Overall Maternal Mortality Ratio across the three hospitals was 38/100,000 LB. Maternal Near Miss indicators were as shown in [Table 1]. The mean age of the cases was 28.98 ± 6.04 years Obstetric characteristics and underlying causes of near miss cases were as shown in [Table 2] and [Table 3] respectively.
Table 1: Maternal near miss indicators at three tertiary care centres

Click here to view
Table 2: Obstetric characteristics of maternal near miss cases in three tertiary care centres

Click here to view
Table 3: Underlying causes of near miss cases in three tertiary care centre (n=147)

Click here to view


Nine recent cases were identified and interviewed for more details considering the different geographical spread of the cases.

The three delays remain the main decisive factors in maternal mortality

Delay in seeking health care

Only in two cases decision to seek care was taken by the cases themselves. For the rest of the cases, the decision to visit the health facility was taken by the husband along with the relatives.

A 33-year-old case described:

“I looked very pale, my legs and body was swollen. I was having difficulty sleeping and I preferred to sit. But I just thought these things are normal, but my husband decided that I better go to the hospital.”

One 37-year-old case explained the lack of people to help out at home was the reason for delay in seeking health care.

“My first child is very young and there is no one to take care of her. Our ASHA visited sometimes and brings me medicines so I thought that is enough, so I didn't go to hospital.”

One 26-year-old case gave lack of resources in terms of finance and thus their preference of home delivery.

We wanted to deliver at home. We don't have enough money to go to the hospital.”

Lack of information and knowledge about the complications of pregnancy was also elicited from a 45-year-old case.

“Previously, all the deliveries were done at home in the village. We didn't think there will be any problems this time.”

Delay in reaching health care

Most of the cases reached the hospital by public transport. Only one case reached the health care facility by private car and another by ambulance provided by the hospital from where they were referred.

“We requested our neighbour to arrange for auto the next morning” (husband of 38-year-old case).

“The doctor from previous hospital arranged ambulance to bring us here” (husband of 33-year-old case).

“It was already 2 days she was in labour, but it is impossible to get any transportation at night in our village. So we had to catch taxi next morning only” (husband of 48-year-old near miss case).

Delay in receiving health care

In half of the cases, there was a delay in referring the patients from peripheral health care center. Most of the responses from health care providers dwelt on the lack of trained personnel in the peripheral centers leading to delay in the management of the cases.

“If the hospital which referred her had been equipped for caesarean section operation, early intervention would have avoided further deterioration of the patient.” (Health care worker attending the case).

“Peripheral hospitals should be better equipped with health care facilities and trained staffs” (Health care worker attending the case).


   Discussion Top


The incidence of MNM described in the literature varies widely due to variations in criteria used to identify MNM cases. With the standardization of MNM criteria proposed by the WHO in 2009, the chances of missing a case was minimized as it considered all clinical, laboratory and management-based criteria. This study uses a criteria for Indian set-up, which was developed by Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, India in 2014.[7]

In this study, 41.5% of the cases received antenatal check-up, out of which 44.3% of them had adequate number of ANC. Majority of the cases, i.e., 68.7% were unbooked cases reflecting that the community is still unaware of the complications of pregnancy. Other studies done by Naz et al.[8] and Oladapo et al.[9] also has similar findings.

A wide range is reported for MNM ratio from studies of other developing countries (12.3–82.3/1000 deliveries).[10],[11] The disparity in prevalence of near-miss cases is possibly due to difference in definition and identification of cases.

The MNM incidence ratio (MNMR) is 4.6/1000 LBs in this study, comparable to study done by Lotufo et al.[12] and Baral et al.[13] in Nepal with near miss ratio of 4.4 and 4.5 cases per 1000 LBs respectively. On the other hand, the incidence ratio was comparatively higher in some studies.[14],[15],[16] In this study, SMOR is 5 per 1000 LB which is similar to studies done by Jabir et al.[17] and Ranatunga et al.[18] Other study by David et al.[19] and Amin et al.[20] had a much higher SMOR. As both these indicators, i.e., MNMR and SMOR give an estimate of the amount of care and resources that would be needed in an area or facility this probably reflects the reasonably good facilities and resources.

In this study, MNM mortality ratio is 12.2:1. This indicates that for every 12–13 women who survived life-threatening complications, there is one death. Other studies found that the MD to near-miss ratio was 1:7, 1:5, and 1:3, respectively.[9],[21],[22] This ratio is indicative of the standard of obstetrical care the unit offers. This is in contrast to what is observed in developed countries of the world. Studies carried out in Europe[10],[23],[24] revealed a ratio of 1:117-–223. If this ratio increases over a period of time, it reflects the improvement achieved in the obstetric care. So instead of a single estimation, yearly estimation may help us in improving the care provided.

The overall MI in this study is 7.5%. Studies conducted at Brazil and Iraq shows similar findings with MI of 11.03% and 10.4%, respectively.[12],[17]

Our study shows a low MI, which indicates the adequate quality of obstetric care for the severe cases. This maybe due to the fact that the hospitals in the study are tertiary hospitals and there are sufficient resources for obstetric care, such as blood bank and operation room.

In this study, direct obstetric cause for near miss case accounts for 83% of the cases. Similar finding was found in a study done by Prual et al. (92.9%).[25]

Majority of the underlying cause of near miss case in this study was due to obstetrical hemorrhage (48.3%), followed by hypertension (32%) and pre-existing cardiac dysfunction which was aggravated by pregnancy in 9.5% of the cases. These findings are similar to studies done by Yasmin et al.[16] Kamal et al.[26] and Doreswamy et al.[27] where hemorrhage was the most common cause for near miss mortality and hypertensive disorders was the second-most common cause. This complication is preventable and can be managed successfully provided proper treatment protocol is followed. MD due to PPH implies a poor obstetric care at the periphery level. One must also ensure timely referral of the complicated cases to tertiary care hospital to reduce the number of near miss and maternal mortality. In contrast to our study, a study conducted in Syria showed hypertensive disorder (52%) to be the most common cause followed by hemorrhage and a study in Ethiopia concluded obstructed labor (45%) to be the predominant cause followed by hemorrhage.[28],[29]

A qualitative approach was done to explore the risk factors in maternal mortality. In this study most of the near miss cases experienced either phase one (delay in seeking health care) and phase two delays (delay in reaching health facility) which resulted from underestimating the severity of various pregnancy-related conditions, lack of available transport particularly for problems occurring in the night as well as first seeking care from a facility that is ill-equipped to provide emergency obstetric care. Poor knowledge of risk associated with various pregnancy-warning signs as well as the failure of peripheral health facilities to provide emergency obstetric services played a major part in the delay of management.


   Conclusion Top


The three delays remain the decisive factors in maternal mortality. Most of the near miss cases experienced delay in decision to seek health care, which resulted from underestimating the severity of various pregnancy-related conditions. Poor knowledge of the risk of warning signs of pregnancy play a major part in the delay of management. The establishment of well-equipped referral units at the periphery with trained manpower is essential. Delayed diagnosis, inappropriate transfer and inadequate utilization of resources might have been the cause for maternal morbidities and mortalities in our study.


   Recommendations Top


Along with increased awareness of one's own health, health education may go a long way in improving the quality of obstetric care. The near miss to mortality ratio is an indicator of quality of obstetric care. If this ratio increases over a period of time, it will reflect on the improvement achieved in obstetric care. So we recommend yearly estimation of this ratio instead of a single estimation, which may help us in improving the care provided.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
United Nations. The Millennium Development Goals Report 2015. New York: UN Department of Public Information; 2015.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Government of India. Millennium Development Goals India Country Report 2015. New Delhi: Social Statistics Division Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation; 2015.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Park K. Park's Textbook of Preventive and Social Medicine. 23rd ed. Jabalpur: Banarsidas Bhanot Publishers; 2015.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
United Nations. Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York: UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs; 2015.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Souza JP, Cecatti JG, Parpinelli MA, Serruya SJ, Amaral E. Appropriate criteria for identification of near-miss maternal morbidity in tertiary care facilities: A cross sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2007;7:20.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Sahel A, Brouwere VD, Lardi M, Lerberghe WV, Ronsmans C, Filippi V. Obstetric catastrophes barely just avoided: Near misses in Moroccan hospitals. Sante 2001;11:229-35.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Government of India. Maternal Near Miss Review Operational Guidelines. New Delhi: Maternal Health Division, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare India; 2014.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Naz T, Akhter N, Naib JM, Gul N. Maternal near-miss morbidity and mortality – A continuum. J Med Sci 2014;22:171-6.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Oladapo OT, Sule-Odu AO, Olatunji AO, Daniel OJ. “Near-miss” obstetric events and maternal deaths in Sagamu, Nigeria: A retrospective study. Reprod Health 2005;2:9.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Say L, Pattinson RC, Gülmezoglu AM. WHO systematic review of maternal morbidity and mortality: The prevalence of severe acute maternal morbidity (near miss). Reprod Health 2004;1:3.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Filippi V, Ronsmans C, Gohou V, Goufodji S, Lardi M, Sahel A, et al. Maternity wards or emergency obstetric rooms? Incidence of near-miss events in African hospitals. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005;84:11-6.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Lotufo FA, Parpinelli MA, Haddad SM, Surita FG, Cecatti JG. Applying the new concept of maternal near-miss in an intensive care unit. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2012;67:225-30.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Baral J, Paudyal P, Rizal H, Jha A, Jha R, Kaudel S, et al. Maternal mortality and near miss review from a university teaching hospital Kathmandu. J Soc Surg Nepal 2013;16:93-100.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Reena RP, Radha KR. Factors associated with maternal near miss: A study from Kerala. Indian J Public Health 2018;62:58-60.  Back to cited text no. 14
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
15.
Sarma HK, Sarma HK, Kalita AK. A prospective study of maternal near-miss and maternal mortality cases in FAAMCH, Barpeta; with special reference to its aetiology and management: First 4 months report. J Obstet Gynaecol Barpeta 2014;1:100-6.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Yasmin G, Najam R, Ghazi S, Lalwani A. Maternal near miss events: A prospective observational study in a tertiary care centre. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2016;5:3088-93.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Jabir M, Abdul-Salam I, Suheil DM, Al-Hilli W, Abul-Hassan S, Al-Zuheiri A, et al. Maternal near miss and quality of maternal health care in Baghdad, Iraq. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2013;13:11.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Ranatunga GA, Akbar JF, Samarathunga S, Perera YA, Kariyawasam L, Kumarasiri JM. Severe acute maternal morbidity in a tertiary care institution. Sri Lanka J Obstet Gynaecol 2012;34:135-43.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
David E, Machungo F, Zanconato G, Cavaliere E, Fiosse S, Sululu C, et al. Maternal near miss and maternal deaths in Mozambique: A cross-sectional, region-wide study of 635 consecutive cases assisted in health facilities of Maputo province. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014;14:401.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Amin SV, Bala S, Kumar P, Rai L, Pai MV, Shetty J. Never miss – A near miss audit. Obstet Gynecol Int J 2017;6:193-5.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Roopa PS, Verma S, Rai L, Kumar P, Pai MV, Shetty J. “Near Miss” obstetric events and maternal deaths in a tertiary care hospital: An audit. J Pregnancy 2013;2013:1-5.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Mansuri F, Mall A. Analysis of maternal near miss at tertiary level hospitals, Ahmedabad: A valuable indicator for maternal health care. Indian J Community Med 2019;44:217-21.  Back to cited text no. 22
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
23.
Waterstone M, Bewley S, Wolfe C. Incidence and predictors of severe obstetric morbidity: Case-control study. BMJ 2001;322:1089-93.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Minkauskiene M, Nadisauskiene R, Padaiga Z, Makari S. Systematic review on the incidence and prevalence of severe maternal morbidity. Medicina (Kaunas) 2004;40:299-309.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Prual A, Bouvier-Colle MH, de Bernis L, Bréart G. Severe maternal morbidity from direct obstetric causes in West Africa: Incidence and case fatality rates. Bull World Health Organ 2000;78:593-602.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Kamal S, Roy P, Singh S, Minz J. A study of maternal near miss cases at tertiary medical college of Jharkhand, India. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2017;6:2375-80.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Doreswamy N, Sudha TR, Tejaswary. Prevalence and outcome of maternal near miss in a tertiary care centre a cross sectional study at Hassan, Karnataka, India. Int J Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2020;4:209-12.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Almerie Y, Almerie MQ, Matar HE, Shahrour Y, Al Chamat AA, Abdulsalam A. Obstetric near-miss and maternal mortality in maternity university hospital, Damascus, Syria: A retrospective study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2010;10:65.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Gedefaw M, Gebrehana H, Gizachew A and Taddess F. Assessment of maternal near miss at Debre Markos referral hospital, Northwest Ethiopia: Five years experience. Open J Epidemiol 2014;4:199-207.  Back to cited text no. 29
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
           

    

 
   Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
  Related articles
    Article in PDF (391 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
   Recommendations
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed256    
    Printed6    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded54    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

  Sitemap | What's New | Feedback | Copyright and Disclaimer
  2007 - Indian Journal of Community Medicine | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
  Online since 15th September, 2007