HomeAboutusEditorial BoardCurrent issuearchivesSearch articlesInstructions for authorsSubscription detailsAdvertise

  Login  | Users online: 586

   Ahead of print articles    Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size  

 Table of Contents    
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 43  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 136

Response from the authors (Surti et al)[1]

Date of Web Publication18-May-2018

Correspondence Address:
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0970-0218.232753

Rights and Permissions


How to cite this article:
. Response from the authors (Surti et al)[1]. Indian J Community Med 2018;43:136

How to cite this URL:
. Response from the authors (Surti et al)[1]. Indian J Community Med [serial online] 2018 [cited 2021 Jan 24];43:136. Available from: https://www.ijcm.org.in/text.asp?2018/43/2/136/232753


First of all, we as authors are glad that you went thoroughly to our article and gave an honest feedback.

We accept the fact that our aim was to identify the risk factors responsible for the spread of disease and prevent its further spread, but we limited our quantitative findings to percentages and proportions, because of the inadequacy of sample size, and instead opted for Root cause analysis to identify aforementioned risk factors.

According to the format provided by the journal, where it was mentioned not to write the labels of tables and diagrams repetitively in the manuscript, the doubt you have raised can be cleared. Due to shortage of the words, we could not describe the diagram which itself was, to the most, self-explanatory.

There is always a scope for any study to do better and provide more conclusive results, but it mainly depends on the setting and resources involved in the study. So the limitations of this study have been mentioned in the limitations section which should be considered while interpreting the results.

Sudden upsurge was explained on the basis of the index case, causes of which were deducted by the In-depth interview. It is suspected that this case led to spread the disease amongst other cases due to same clientele, staying in closed group, and staying in the same area and following similar practices.

All the female sex workers undergo routine examination every 3 months (blood tests including HIV, VDRL and if VDRL +ve then followed by TPHA, per vaginum and per speculum examination) as they are beneficiaries of Community Based Organisation, Sahyog, implementing Targeted Intervention under NACO. It is while interpreting their routine tests results, this outbreak had come to light and the study was planned to document the cases and the outbreak.


Print this article  Email this article


    Similar in PUBMED
    Article in PDF (161 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded63    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

  Sitemap | What's New | Feedback | Copyright and Disclaimer
  2007 - Indian Journal of Community Medicine | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
  Online since 15th September, 2007