|
 |
|
LETTER TO EDITOR |
|
|
|
|
| Year : 2018 | Volume
: 43
| Issue : 2 | Page : 128-129 |
| |
Assessing cataract patient understanding of proper eyedrop instillation in Chennai, India
Zachary Mostel1, Natan R Kahan2
1 School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel
2 School of Public Health, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel
| Date of Submission | 26-Jul-2017 |
| Date of Acceptance | 13-Jan-2018 |
| Date of Web Publication | 18-May-2018 |
Correspondence Address:
Mr. Zachary Mostel
Room 216, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yaffo
Israel
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/ijcm.IJCM_188_17
How to cite this article:
Mostel Z, Kahan NR. Assessing cataract patient understanding of proper eyedrop instillation in Chennai, India. Indian J Community Med 2018;43:128-9 |
How to cite this URL:
Mostel Z, Kahan NR. Assessing cataract patient understanding of proper eyedrop instillation in Chennai, India. Indian J Community Med [serial online] 2018 [cited 2021 Jan 28];43:128-9. Available from: https://www.ijcm.org.in/text.asp?2018/43/2/128/232760 |
Sir,
Proper knowledge, attitude, and practice of eyedrop application are all necessary for managing eye diseases.[1] Most research has centered on these areas, with several studies finding that better instruction yields greater efficacy. The effectiveness of eyedrops is determined by proper technique and scheduled dosing. Female gender, younger age, lack of education, living alone, and severe eye disease were all found to correlate with improper technique and inferior adherence to the regimen.[2],[3],[4],[5] The Chennai Glaucoma Study (2009) found that, in addition to a high incidence of cataracts, locals lacked awareness of ocular health.[6] Proper use of medication is a high priority in areas like Chennai, India, that are vulnerable to eye disease and infection.
The objective was to assess cataract patient understanding of prescribed eye medication immediately following prescription of the regimen. Specifically, we investigated whether certain sociodemographic factors correlate to a high or low level of understanding of proper eyedrop use. The Tel-Aviv University Institutional Review Board approved this study.
Between July 18, 2016, and August 8, 2016, a sample of 50 preoperative cataract patients was recruited from outreach camps for vision screening. The assessment was performed before surgery. An optometrist provided detailed verbal instruction to the patient regarding proper postoperative eyedrop usage. If the drops were to be administered by an attendant or family member who was present with the patient, they too were included in the instructions and evaluation. Subsequently, an eight-item standardized questionnaire [Table 1] was used to assess understanding. Administration was assessed using a validated protocol for analyzing eyedrop instillation.[2] The interview was scored out of a possible eight. Sociodemographic factors (age, gender, education, residence, poverty score, administration by self/other, previous use) were analyzed for association with understanding the prescribed regimen and proper instillation. | Table 1: Knowledge test questionnaire (values represent percentage of participants, n=50)
Click here to view |
The mean knowledge test score was 5.5 ± 2.2, and the mode was 7 (36% of participants). Variance in mean knowledge test scores was not observed among most sociodemographic variables. For the variable of administration, there was a difference in the mean test scores between those who self-administered drops and those who had another person administer them. Participants that had someone else administer the eyedrops performed significantly better than those self-administering (self-use: 4.6, instillation by other: 5.9, P = 0.05). Levene's test for equality of variances confirmed that there was a difference in variances within the sample (P = 0.03). Participants who self-administered were more likely than those with another administrator to have below average knowledge test scores (odds ratio: 4.18, 95% confidence interval: 1.18, 14.82, P = 0.03). When assessing for proper use, 31% (5/16) of self-administrators incorrectly used the drops, while 9% (3/34) of those with another administrator used the drops incorrectly. In addition, question 7, which asked the reason eyedrops are necessary, was the question that participants answered incorrectly most frequently (31/50 or 62%). This was evident in all sociodemographic variables, including the variable of administration (10/16 or 63%).
To our knowledge, this was the first study to assess cataract patients in southern India for the underlying determinants of understanding prescribed instructions before initiating instillation outside of a clinical setting. The key finding was that self-administration was associated with a lack of understanding of the regimen. Identification of this risk factor is useful for targeted patient education that can be introduced in office to diminish risk. Self-administrators are often older and live alone (mean age 64 ± 16 years) and are likely unaware of poor understanding and technique. Participants in the study were also found to lack the understanding as to why the eyedrops were prescribed. We surmise that many are under the erroneous impression that drops are meant to alleviate postoperative discomfort and that they may discontinue use when symptoms resolve. Careful instruction is a major predictor of effective use and will ensure patient adherence to and effective use of eyedrops.[7]
Acknowledgment
The authors would like to thank Connor Orrico of Unite for Sight for his role in study design and development of the project. We truly hold in high regard the Directors of Surgery Drs. Tamilarasan Senthil and Nainappan Malathi for their support and supervision of the project.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
 References | |  |
| 1. | Lee BW, Sathyan P, John RK, Singh K, Robin AL. Predictors of and barriers associated with poor follow-up in patients with glaucoma in South India. Arch Ophthalmol 2008;126:1448-54.  [ PUBMED] |
| 2. | Sayner R, Carpenter DM, Robin AL, Blalock SJ, Muir KW, Vitko M, et al. How glaucoma patient characteristics, self-efficacy and patient-provider communication are associated with eye drop technique. Int J Pharm Pract 2016;24:78-85. |
| 3. | Mohindroo C, Ichhpujani P, Kumar S. How 'drug aware' are our glaucoma patients? J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2015;9:33-7. [ PUBMED] |
| 4. | Dreer LE, Girkin C, Mansberger SL. Determinants of medication adherence to topical glaucoma therapy. J Glaucoma 2012;21:234-40. [ PUBMED] |
| 5. | Friedman DS, Okeke CO, Jampel HD, Ying GS, Plyler RJ, Jiang Y, et al. Risk factors for poor adherence to eyedrops in electronically monitored patients with glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2009;116:1097-105. [ PUBMED] |
| 6. | Sathyamangalam RV, Paul PG, George R, Baskaran M, Hemamalini A, Madan RV, et al. Determinants of glaucoma awareness and knowledge in urban Chennai. Indian J Ophthalmol 2009;57:355-60. [ PUBMED] [Full text] |
| 7. | Carpenter DM, Tudor GE, Sayner R, Muir KW, Robin AL, Blalock SJ, et al. Exploring the influence of patient-provider communication on intraocular pressure in glaucoma patients. Patient Educ Couns 2015. pii: S0738-3991(15)30010-0. |
[Table 1]
|
