|Year : 2015 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 49-55
Mainstreaming of emergency contraception pill in India: Challenges and opportunities
Anvita Dixit, ME Khan, Isha Bhatnagar
Reproductive Health Program, Population Council, New Delhi, India
|Date of Submission||19-Feb-2014|
|Date of Acceptance||08-May-2014|
|Date of Web Publication||13-Jan-2015|
Assistant Program Officer, Population Council, 42 Golf Links, First Floor, New Delhi - 110 003
Source of Support: This study was funded by the International Consortium
for Emergency Contraception (ICEC)
, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Background: Emergency Contraception Pill (ECP) is an essential intervention to prevent unwanted pregnancies. However, its use has remained low due to various barriers including reservations among medical fraternity. Materials and Methods: This paper presents findings on barriers to ECP's easy access for potential users from (i) a cross-sectional survey of providers' attitudes, beliefs, and practices and interviews with key opinion leaders, (ii) three consultations organized by Population Council with policymakers and public health experts, and (iii) evidence from scientific literature. Results: The major barriers to easy access of ECP include misconceptions and reservations of providers (disapproval of ECP provision by CHWs, opposition to its being an OTC product, and myths, misconceptions, and moral judgments about its users) including influential gynecologists. Conclusion: For mainstreaming ECP, the paper recommends educational campaign focusing on gynecologists and CHWs, relaxing restrictive policy on advertisement of ECP, involving press media and strengthening supply chain to ensure its regular supply to ASHA (CHW).
Keywords: Easy access, emergency contraception, family planning, levonorgestrel, provider barriers
|How to cite this article:|
Dixit A, Khan M E, Bhatnagar I. Mainstreaming of emergency contraception pill in India: Challenges and opportunities. Indian J Community Med 2015;40:49-55
|How to cite this URL:|
Dixit A, Khan M E, Bhatnagar I. Mainstreaming of emergency contraception pill in India: Challenges and opportunities. Indian J Community Med [serial online] 2015 [cited 2022 Aug 9];40:49-55. Available from: https://www.ijcm.org.in/text.asp?2015/40/1/49/149271
| Background|| |
Emergency Contraception Pill (ECP) is an effective reproductive health intervention, which could protect millions of women from unwanted pregnancy. In India, ECP was introduced in 2002 by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW) and was made an over the counter (OTC) drug in 2005. Less than one-third women are aware of ECP and less than one percent have ever used it.  The latest data from 8 states covered in the Annual Health Survey shows a continued very low (less than 0.2 percent) use of ECP.  Occasionally, media coverage has portrayed ECP use in a negative manner. , A national newspaper titled, "Morning-after pill: A medical nightmare?" wrote "Often the male partner does not bring the pills and this puts woman at more risk. Youngsters are using emergency pills too often. These pills should be sold only on a doctor's prescription". 
Given the above backdrop, a study was conducted by the Population Council in 2011-12. Some of the key issues addressed in the study included providers' knowledge on mechanism of action and attitudes towards; easy access to ECP and its link to pre-marital sex and promiscuity, repeated use of ECP and as a replacement for regular family planning methods; perceived profile of ECP users, and lack of information and myths about ECP among potential users, particularly in rural areas. In addition to a survey, in depth interviews were conducted with officials of the MoHFW, leading gynecologists, representatives of professional medical associations, and civil society and donor organizations, and the current status of ECP use was analyzed using shop audit data of ECP sale volume collected by AC Neilsen ORG MARG. The findings were presented in a series of three national consultations with 120 key stakeholders mentioned above, including senior managers of pharmaceutical companies.
The present paper summarizes the overall outcome of the consultations supported by some of the key findings from the Council study of providers and other published literatures to suggest a way forward for mainstreaming of ECP.
| Materials and Methods|| |
This paper is based on findings from
- The Population Council's study which includes in-depth interviews of key opinion leaders (KOLs), , whose views could make a substantial difference in policy-making and program implementation;
- The three consultations mentioned above;
- The review of literature that was easily accessible to complement the findings, and
- The presentations made by participants during the consultations.
The first consultation sought to understand policymaker's and health practitioners' attitudes towards ECP, its mechanism of action, concerns in making ECP easily accessible, and similar issues, which could facilitate or create barriers to easy access for women who need it. The findings and concerns raised during the consultation were used in developing tools for the study including guidelines for in depth interviews of the KOLs.
The follow up two consultations organized at Delhi and Mumbai were used to share findings of the study and deliberate its implications for service providers, manufacturers, social marketing firms, and recipients of the services - the woman at large. The Mumbai consultation was particularly important as it included medical associations such as Federation of Obstetric and Gynaecological Societies of India (FOGSI) and Indian Medical Association (IMA), representatives of commercial marketing firms, large NGOs apart from the researchers, and social activists. The key issues discussed in these consultations included:
- Implications of the providers study on increasing access and use of ECP
- Mainstream use of ECP in the national family welfare program
- Strategy that FOGSI could adopt to inform their members and remove their reservations and misconceptions about the product and its users
- Discuss with key opinion leaders on government restrictive policy on advertisement and manufacturers' support to pharmacists who are the main providers of ECP in urban India.
Current status of ECP sale from the retail market
Shop audit report by AC Nielsen ORG MARG reveals that sale of ECP in last 5 years has increased almost 4 times, from 4.9 million in 2008 to 16.4 million in 2013, as illustrated in the [Figure 1] below.
Seventy-one percent of total sales are in urban areas, which constitute only 29.8 percent of the national population. The 18 large Metro cities contribute 29 percent of the total sales, while Delhi NCR alone contributes 8.6 percent of total sales, followed by Mumbai and Kolkata. In Chennai, the sale of ECP was negligible as sale of ECP in Tamil Nadu is banned. However, access to ECP is low in smaller towns and in the rural areas. The AC Neilsen ORG MARG data further shows that although there are 42 brands of ECP being sold in the market, only a few brands control the major market share. For example, in 2010, 2 top brands accounted for more than 84 percent of the sale as a result of aggressive promotion and good commission paid to the retailers. Furthermore, the contribution of public health clinics in free distribution of ECP is marginal.  The government procures ECPs and provides it free-of-cost from its health facilities, and tries to reach at the door steps in rural areas through the Accredited Social Health Activist (ASHA) since 2011. However, according to the Annual Health Survey in 2010-11, only 0.12 percent of the rural women had ever used ECP.  NFHS3 shows that less than 1 percent are aware of ECP.  They face barriers such as lack of accessibility or relatively high cost (ranging from Rs. 2 for the government brand to Rs. 100 for the most popular commercial urban brand) of the product.
Mainstreaming of ECP
For the present study, "mainstreaming" has been defined as making ECP readily accessible at an affordable price in the basket of contraceptives for anyone who needs it. At the policy level, ECP is included in the national family welfare program. However, there is a need for better supply, training of providers, and linking it with regular family planning programs. When ECP was introduced, no sustained efforts were made to educate about ECP at any level of providers - doctors, ANMs, and ASHA. Some senior officials of the MoHFW believed that there is no need to train healthcare providers in ECP, as the leaflet provided with the pill is self-explanatory. To make contraceptives easily accessible in rural India, the MoHFW made ASHA the depot holder of these methods. Initially, this scheme was implemented in 184 backward districts on a pilot basis and expanded to the entire country. Under the scheme, ASHA can charge Re. 1 for a pack of 3 condoms, Re. 1 for 1 month's cycle of OCP, and Rs. 2 for 1 pill of ECP.  If the contraceptive supplies are maintained as per requirement, this scheme has potential for making these methods easily accessible to the beneficiaries even in the remote villages. However, success of the scheme is dependent on regular supply of these methods and correct knowledge of ASHAs and their counseling skills. Some of the studies show that contraceptive supply is a serious issue and needs immediate action. ,, Evaluation of the depot scheme of ASHA reported that 46 percent ASHAs had lack of supply due to challenges in management of the supply chain.  A recent study showed that 97 percent ASHAs in Bihar had not been supplied ECP and only 14 percent were aware of the correct use of the method.  This indicates that for mainstreaming of ECP, not only do women need to know about the methods but the providers also need to be educated about the correct use of ECP and availability needs to be ensured. The consultations emphasized that counseling of ECP should be linked to counseling of other methods, i.e., every time they counsel for OCPs and condoms, they should inform their clients about ECP as back-up emergency method.
Knowledge of ECP and ambiguity regarding mechanism of action
The Population Council study in 2011 showed that majority of the providers including gynecologists believed that ECP works by preventing implantation (96%), which was indicated in the 20 th edition of Contraceptive Technology.  However, subsequent studies documented that there is no scientific evidence that ECP interferes in implantation of fertilized egg. It was well established by 2012 that its primary mechanism of action is by inhibiting ovulation. ,, A meta-analysis of 444 articles confirmed that ECP does not interfere with fertilized egg and does not prevent implantation.  However, during the consultations both in Delhi and Mumbai, most of the doctors were not aware of this and were still of the view that ECP works by preventing implantation.
ECP is a safe and effective method with no contraindications. However, according to the providers' study, doctors have misconceptions about contraindications and side effects. Many incorrectly believe that ECP should not be used by women in pregnancy, breastfeeding, and various other illnesses. , Some doctors also expressed the fear that repeat use of ECP could lead to ectopic pregnancy. However, many studies including a systematic review of 136 studies ruled out any increased risk of ectopic pregnancy due to mifepristone and levonorgestrel emergency contraception.  ECPs, like other contraceptives, reduce the chance of ectopic pregnancy. , Such misconceptions about ectopic pregnancy among professionals need to be addressed.
While most doctors in the consultation felt that ECP could not induce abortion, the Council's study showed that 10 percent of the doctors believed that ECP could be used as an abortion pill. This misbelief and a confusion between OCP, ECP, and abortion pills was also reported by ASHAs and ANMs.  The consultation unanimously agreed on the need to educate the providers as well as the users on this aspect and eradicate the misbelief that ECP could also be used as abortion pills.
During consultations many senior gynecologists, including three of the past and current Presidents of FOGSI felt that the recent research findings were not reaching doctors and gynecologists, and hence, they continue to believe that the main mechanism of ECP is preventing implantation. There was a general consensus that medical associations such as FOGSI and IMA could play a critical role in disseminating new research and findings on ECP through their national, state, and regional conferences and through their newsletters and articles in their journals.
Attitudes of Providers on
In the providers' study, in-depth interviews of KOLs and during the two consultations, questions were asked regarding the attitude of the doctors on different aspects of ECP use. The responses are briefly summarized below:
Provision of ECP
Gynecologists have strong influence on policymaking and uptake among beneficiaries and hence have major role in mainstreaming of ECP. The reservations amongst gynecologists is a barrier to access of ECP for those who need it. ,,, Research findings show that gynecologists opposed ECP provision as a prophylactic (51 percent), as an OTC product (64 percent), by ASHA (52 percent), and without an age restriction (83 percent). A senior gynecologist at the consultation meeting said, "even though our attitudes have changed in the past 10 years on the use and provision of ECP, we still do not want to inform a young girl about ECP. She is just informed that she needs to be careful and seek help if unprotected sex or gynecological problems occur".
Perception about ECP users
According to Council's study, gynecologists believed that women who use ECP have premarital sex, have multiple sexual partners, have STIs, have risky sexual behavior, and could substitute ECP for other family planning methods. Gynecologists' interviews by national media also support these findings. ,, These attitudes also influence provision of ECP services by gynecologists and general medical practitioners. For example, during the ECP study, the ECP supplied by the government was lying in large number in a corner but not given to beneficiaries because of the lady doctor in-charge of the clinic had instructed the Social Worker who dispensed contraceptives to "….not give ECP to any one unless I prescribe it".
Most doctors said that married women and women who have infrequent or unprotected sex can use ECP but fewer agreed to its use by unmarried adolescents. It is important to note that the available evidence does not show any linkages between ECP use and sexual behavior. ,,,, Another study showed that use of ECP does not increase risky sexual behaviors or decrease use of other contraceptive methods.,,
ECPs role in reducing abortion
During the consultations, it emerged that there is no consensus on the role of ECP in reducing abortion. While a few felt that the number of young girls seeking abortion in their clinic has decreased, others did not support this observation. For example a senior gynecologist, during in-depth interview, said "…the number of young girls who used to come for abortion has declined. In my own clinic 2-3 unmarried young girls used to come every month. Now it is rare. So perhaps ECP does reduce unnecessary abortions." However, the quantitative study did not report any such impact of ECP. Evidence also reported no public health effect of ECP. , The consultations strongly recommended that the role of ECP in abortion should not be debated and women must have access to safe and hygienic abortion services as their right.
Pharmacists are the main providers of ECP in urban areas and have a major role in mainstreaming ECP. In the consultation, most of the participants including manufacturers felt that it is difficult to use the pharmacists to provide information on ECP to their clients. Generally, the shops are crowded and women and men who come for purchase of ECP may not like to discuss it with the pharmacist nor the pharmacists have time to explain it to them. The Council study in which 199 pharmacists were also interviewed revealed that many of the pharmacists also have reserved attitudes towards the users and felt that use of ECP will lead to premarital sex and promiscuity (74 percent and 46 percent, respectively), as one of the pharmacist said, "Almost all who come to this shop are unmarried girls and boys".  They were also in favor of an age restriction to use ECP (76 percent). Curiously, for them their personal attitude did not interfere in stocking and selling ECP as it was their business. In Delhi during qualitative interviews of pharmacists, 24 out of 28 pharmacists' qualitative interviews said that they receive 50 to 70 percent of commission from medical representatives to sell their brand. A pharmacist said that "The medical representative told me that there is a big margin in ECP and motivated me to keep ECP", and another reported that "Money is the motivator."Attitudes of different providers from the Council study, presented and discussed in the consultation, are reported in [Table 1] below.
ECP replacing use of other contraceptive method
Discussion on possibility of ECP replacing or reducing regular family planning use, had a mixed reaction in the consultations as well as in the study of the providers. However, in general, majority felt that in absence of evidence it is difficult to believe that women are switching over from regular method to ECP. It was argued that given the cost of ECP, its use as a regular method could be a strong deterrent. In contrast some studies indicate that instead of reducing the use of regular family method, ECP could play bridging role, as many women after using ECP switch over to regular method or to an effective modern method. For example, a Bangladesh study showed that after using ECP, 96 percent of women who were earlier using a method went back to their previous method.  Of the 16 percent of women who were not using any method, 68 percent adopted contraception after using ECP. A similar study in India, showed that use of regular methods (condoms, OCP, CuT, and sterilization) increased from 13 percent to 70 percent after ECP use. 
The discussion on repeated use of ECP revealed that most of the experts as well as respondents in the Council study lacked clarity whether ECP could be used repeatedly within the same menstrual cycle. During the consultation and KOLs in-depth interviews, senior gynecologists said that they were getting increasing number of cases with menstrual disturbance. The consensus was that repeat use would be harmful as it could disrupt a woman's menstrual cycle and may not protect against unwanted pregnancy. However, a representative from the ICEC endorsed WHOs statement that "Repeated use poses no known health risks". A senior gynecologist also added that "there is no contraindication to repeated ECP use, and women should not be denied repeat access to ECPs if needed" (Association of Reproductive Health Professionals) and "…, in particular when pregnancies are unintended and women do not have access to safe abortion services. Women should use ECPs as often as needed" (International Consortium for Medical Abortion).  At the end of deliberation, most recommended that ECP could be used only in an emergency, as recommended by the government, or if it's necessary, not more than 2-3 times in the same menstrual cycle. 
Advertisement for demand generation
At the time of introduction of ECP, aggressive advertisements by some manufacturers attracted negative attention and led to nationwide ban on advertising. A Chennai-based lawyer who represented parent's associations in the high court pleading for banning its sale in Tamil Nadu said, "such an advertisement takes away responsibility from the act of sexual intercourse; and the branding (of this pill) is also not so subtle insinuation that pre-marital sex is alright". 
All representatives of different manufacturing firms felt that in absence of permission for advertisement, promotion of ECP in smaller towns and urban areas is a big challenge, and many firms may discontinue manufacturing it. A senior government official, informed that a decision had been taken to allow advertisements, provided a committee formed by the MoHFW approves the content. Given the long procedure of government approval on advertising, it is discouraging to manufacturers and they may not seek such permission.
High cost of many popular brands of ECP makes ECP less affordable to the poorer section of population. Lack of advertisement makes manufacturing companies dependent upon pharmacists to stock and promote demand for their product. To attract pharmacies to stock their product, manufacturers are forced to pay unusually high commission to the pharmacists thereby persuading them to keep the price high. If advertisement is allowed and people are aware of all available brands, clients could demand a brand of their choice, thus forcing pharmacists to stock more than one brand and making ECP cheaper is economically viable. Similar concerns were expressed at the consultations by social marketing firms who sell ECP at a marginal profit. This limits them in expanding to smaller towns and rural areas, where there is lack of awareness and little demand. This makes ECP a non-attractive product for pharmacists, who do not want to block their money and shelf space on a slow moving product.
Based on the study, consultations and the model for change, which emerged from these discussions, [Table 2] recommends a framework for consideration of all stakeholders for mainstreaming of ECP in the national family welfare program.
| Conclusion|| |
The Population Council study and the consultations brought to light several critical issues to be addressed for mainstreaming ECP. Several barriers including lack of correct knowledge about ECP, and myths and misconceptions related to its effectiveness and contraindications were identified among providers including senior gynecologists. Most of the providers demonstrated reservations about easy access and use of ECP. Among doctors, strong tendency of medicalization of ECP was observed and reflected in opposing continuation of ECP as OTC drug or making it available through CHWs such as ASHA. Disapproving attitude of providers and perceived reservations about the users could be serious barriers to expanding access to ECP. While manufacturers and social marketing firms could contribute in mainstreaming ECP, their profit motives limits their activities to large urban areas, and to relatively better-educated audiences who can afford to pay high cost of ECP. Restrictive policy by government on advertisement further dampens ability of manufacturers and social marketing firms to expand to smaller towns and rural areas. The poor and rural segment of the population are left to the public health system, where demand generation, supply chain and providers reservations are major barriers. The study findings followed by consultations helped identify various ways through which these barriers could be addressed and help in contributing in mainstreaming of ECP.
| Acknowledgements|| |
We are thankful to Late Dr. Deoki Nandan for encouraging us to write this paper and suggesting points based on the consultation in which he himself was an active participant. We also acknowledge the International Consortium for Emergency Contraception for providing funds for this activity.
| References|| |
International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and Macro International. National Family Health Survey-3 (NFHS-3), 2005-06: India: Vol. 1. Mumbai: IIPS; 2007.
Annual Health Survey (2010-11). Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner, India. Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India. New Delhi: ORG; 2010-11.
Khan ME, Varma DS, Bhatnagar I, Dixit A, Brady M. Attitudes, beliefs, and practices of providers′ and key opinion leaders′ on emergency contraception in India. New Delhi: Population Council; 2012.
Khan ME, Dixit A, Bhatnagar I, Brady M. Medical barriers to emergency contraception: A cross-sectional survey of doctors in North India. Glob Health Sci Pract 2014;2:210-8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-13-00139
[Last accessed on 2014 Jun 13].
Basu S, Green M. An evaluation of the government of India′s initiative on contraceptives at the doorstep by Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs). New Delhi: FHI360; 2012.
Population Council. Evaluation of the feasibility, utility and effects of the use of family planning tools at the community level - India. New Delhi: Population Council; 2014.
Bhatnagar I, Khan ME, Hazra A. Increasing postpartum contraception in rural Bihar. In: Khan ME, Donnay F, Tarigopula UK, Aruldas K, editors. Shaping Demand and Practices to Improve Family Health Outcomes: Designing a Behavior Change Communication Strategy in India. Vol 3. Bihar: Population Council. 2013 p. 128-64.
In: Trussell HJ, Nelson AL, Cates W, editors. Contraceptive Technology. 20th revised ed. New York: Ardent Media; 2011.
Noe G, Croxatto HB, Salvatierra AM, Reyes V, Villarroel C, Munoz C, et al
. Contraceptive efficacy of emergency contraception with levonorgestrel given before or after ovulation. Contraception 2011;84:486-92.
International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO); International Consortium for Emergency Contraception (ICEC). Mechanism of action: how do levonorgestrel-only emergency contraceptive pills (LNG ECPs) prevent pregnancy? London: FIGO; 2012. Co-published by ICEC. Available from: http://www.figo.org/files/figo-corp/MOA_FINAL_2011_ENG.pdf
Suárez VJ, Zavala R, Ureta JM, Hijar G, Lucero J, Pachas P. Effect of levonorgestrel in the ovulation, endometrium, and spermatozoa for emergency oral contraception. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica 2010;27:222-30.
Cleland K, Raymond E, Trussell J, Cheng L, Zhu H. Ectopic pregnancy and emergency contraception: A systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2010;115:1263-6.
World Health Organization, Department of Reproductive Health and Research. Emergency contraceptive pills (ECPs). Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use. 4th ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009. p. 63.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 112: Emergency contraception. Obstet Gynecol 2010;115:1100-9.
Singh S, Mittal S, Anandalakshmy PN, Goel V. Emergency contraception: Knowledge and views of doctors in Delhi. Health Popul Perspect Issues 2002;25:45-54.
Tripathi R, Rathore AM, Sachdeva J. Emergency contraception: Knowledge, attitude, and practices among health care providers in north India. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2003;29:142-6.
Williams K. Provider-related barriers to accessing emergency contraception in developing countries: A literature review. Washington: Population Council; 2011.
RaineTR, Harper CC, Rocca CH, Fischer R, Padian N, Klausner JD, et al
. Direct access to emergency contraception through pharmacies and effect on unintended pregnancy and STIs: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2005;293:54-62.
Blanchard K, Haskell S, Ferden S, Johnstone K, Spears A, Evans M, et al
. Differences between emergency contraception users in the United States and the United Kingdom. J Am Med Womens Assoc 2002;57:200-3, 214.
Glasier A, Baird D. The effects of self-administering emergency contraception. N Engl J Med 1998;339:1-4.
Jackson RA, Schwarz BE, Freedman L, Darney P. Advance supply of emergency contraception. Effect on use and usual contraception--a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:8-16.
Harper CC, Cheong M, Rocca CH, DarneyPD, Raine TR. The effect of increased access to emergency contraception among young adolescents. Obstet Gynecol 2005;106:483-91.
Belzer M, Sanchez K, Olson J, Jacobs AM, Tucker D. Advance supply of emergency contraception: A randomized trial in adolescent mothers. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2005;18:347-54.
Adamji JM, Swartwout K. Advance provision of emergency contraception for adolescents. J Sch Nurs 2010;26:443-9.
Khan ME, Ismail-Hossain SM, Rahman M. Introduction of emergency contraception in Bangladesh: Using operations research for policy decision. FRONTIERS Final Report. Washington: Population Council; 2004.
Glasier A, Fairhurst K, Wyke S, Ziebland S, Seaman P, Walker J, et al.
Advanced provision of emergency contraception does not reduce abortion rates. Contraception 2004;69:361-6.
Raymond EG, Trussell J, Polis CB. Population effect of increased access to emergency contraceptive pills: A systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:181-8.
Khan ME, Bhatnagar I, Dixit A. Are pharmacists ready to counsel on emergency contraceptive pills? An assessment of their knowledge, attitudes and practices around emergency contraception in North India. Population Council. 2014. Unpublished Paper.
Rich S. Emergency contraception: A global perspective. Presented on 3 May 2013 at the consultation on Mainstreaming ECP in the national family welfare program in Mumbai, India.
Mittal S. Emergency contraception in India. Presented on 3 May 2011 at the consultation on Mainstreaming ECP in the National Family Welfare Program in Mumbai, India.
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MOHFW). Guidelines for Administration of Emergency Contraceptive Pills by Health Care Providers. Family Planning Division, MOHFW, Government of India; 2008.
[Table 1], [Table 2]
|This article has been cited by|
||Of ban, use, and misuse: Young women and emergency contraceptive pill in contemporary India
| ||Himani Bajaj |
| ||Asian Journal of Women's Studies. 2022; : 1 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Over-the-counter provision of emergency contraceptive pills: a systematic review
| ||Kaitlyn Atkins, Caitlin E Kennedy, Ping Teresa Yeh, Manjulaa Narasimhan |
| ||BMJ Open. 2022; 12(3): e054122 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Exploring and Monitoring Privacy, Confidentiality, and Provider Bias in Sexual and Reproductive Health Service Provision to Young People: A Narrative Review
| ||Andrew G. Corley, Andrea Sprockett, Dominic Montagu, Nirali M. Chakraborty |
| ||International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(11): 6576 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||A study to assess the knowledge and awareness among young doctors about emergency contraception
| ||Subrat Panda, Rituparna Das, Ananya Das, Nalini Sharma, Anusuya Sharma |
| ||Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care. 2021; 10(6): 2304 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Critical ethnographic respect: womens’ narratives, material conditions, and emergency contraception in India
| ||Nayantara Sheoran Appleton |
| ||Anthropology & Medicine. 2020; : 1 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Taking stock of 10?years of published research on the ASHA programme: examining India’s national community health worker programme from a health systems perspective
| ||Kerry Scott,Asha S. George,Rajani R. Ved |
| ||Health Research Policy and Systems. 2019; 17(1) |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|