HomeAboutusEditorial BoardCurrent issuearchivesSearch articlesInstructions for authorsSubscription detailsAdvertise

  Login  | Users online: 1441

   Ahead of print articles    Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size  

 Table of Contents    
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 37  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 214-218

Iron Sucrose Versus Oral Iron Therapy in Pregnancy Anemia

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, KMC Hospital, Manipal University Manipal, Karnataka, India

Date of Submission22-Oct-2011
Date of Acceptance17-Jun-2012
Date of Web Publication15-Nov-2012

Correspondence Address:
Lavanya Rai
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, KMC Hospital, Manipal University, Manipal, Karnataka
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0970-0218.103467

Rights and Permissions



Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is the most common medical problem in pregnancy. Parenteral iron is a useful treatment, although iron dextran use decreased due to anaphylaxis. Iron sucrose is a newer agent that has overcome the shortcomings of iron dextran. Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerance of intravenous iron sucrose (IVIS) therapy with oral iron (OI) therapy in pregnant women with IDA and to study the factors influencing treatment. Materials and Methods: This prospective, randomized clinical trial included pregnant women between 14 and 36 weeks with established IDA who were treated with IVIS or OI (ferrous fumarate). All patients were monitored for laboratory response and adverse effects. Independent sample-t test, Chi square test and ANOVA were used for statistical analysis. P < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Although hemoglobin increased in both the groups, increase in the reticulocyte count and percentage increase in hemoglobin was significantly higher in the IVIS group than in the OI group (23.62% vs. 14.11%). Serum ferritin was significantly higher in the IVIS group than in the OI group (P = 0.000). The IVIS group had no major side-effects. Compliance was good with OI, although 23% had gastrointestinal side-effects. Patient weight, gestation at diagnosis, initial hemoglobin and ferritin levels did not influence the response to treatment. Conclusion: IVIS is safe and effective in the treatment of IDA during pregnancy. Iron stores increased better with IVIS compared with OI.

Keywords: Intravenous iron sucrose, iron deficiency anemia, oral iron, pregnancy anemia, serum ferritin

How to cite this article:
Neeru S, Nair N S, Rai L. Iron Sucrose Versus Oral Iron Therapy in Pregnancy Anemia. Indian J Community Med 2012;37:214-8

How to cite this URL:
Neeru S, Nair N S, Rai L. Iron Sucrose Versus Oral Iron Therapy in Pregnancy Anemia. Indian J Community Med [serial online] 2012 [cited 2022 May 28];37:214-8. Available from: https://www.ijcm.org.in/text.asp?2012/37/4/214/103467

   Introduction Top

Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is one of the most widespread of all nutritional deficiencies in pregnancy. Estimates from the World Health Organization (WHO) report that from 35% to 75% of pregnant women in developing countries are anemic. [1]

The standard treatment in majority of the institutions is oral iron (OI), with blood transfusion reserved for severe or emergency cases. However, it is unreliable in the treatment of severe anemia. Blood transfusion has its own hazards, including transfusion of wrong blood and deadly infections like HIV, CMV, hepatitis and anaphylaxis. Thus, there is a need for a safe and effective alternative to OI or blood transfusion in the treatment of anemia. Iron dextran, the first parenteral iron used, lost its popularity due to anaphylaxis. Iron sucrose was then discovered as a parenteral iron that could be safe and effective.

This study was undertaken to find out the usefulness of iron sucrose for the treatment of IDA in pregnancy.

   Materials and Methods Top

The objectives of the study were to compare the efficacy and tolerance of intravenous iron sucrose (IVIS) therapy with OI therapy in pregnant women with IDA and to study the factors influencing treatment.

This prospective randomized clinical trial registered under the Clinical Trial Registry, India, was carried out from July 2008 to September 2010. Ethical committee clearance was obtained from the hospital ethical committee. Pregnant women, from 14 to 36 weeks of gestation, with hemoglobin level 6.5-10.9 g/dL and ferritin levels less than 27 ng/dL were enrolled after taking informed consent. This cut-off of serum ferritin was chosen because the lower limit in our laboratory is 27 ng/dL. Women with severe anemia requiring blood transfusion, bronchial asthma and suspected acute infection were excluded from the study. Target hemoglobin for the study was 11 g/dL.

A sample size analysis was done at the initiation of the study. Standard deviation of hemoglobin was estimated to be approximately 1.5 g/dL. Based on a two-tailed α of 0.05, it was determined that 37 patients per group were required to detect a 1 g/dL hemoglobin difference in the outcome variable with a power variable of 80%. On the assumption of an overall rate of loss to follow-up of about 30-35%, 50 subjects per group were enrolled. Block randomization was done to assign patients to either the IVIS or the OI group.

After detailed history and examination, laboratory investigations performed were hemoglobin, packed cell volume (PCV), red cell count, red cell indices, reticulocyte count and peripheral smear. IDA was confirmed by serum iron profile consisting of serum ferritin, serum iron and total iron binding capacity. After 10 days, reticulocyte response was checked while other investigations were repeated after 1 month.

The dose for IVIS was calculated from the following formula: [2]

Dose (mg) = [250 × (target Hb (11 g/dL) - present Hb) +500 mg (for iron stores)]

The calculated dose was rounded up to the nearest multiple of 100 mg. Target hemoglobin in g/dL was set at 11 g/dL based on the WHO definition for anemia in pregnancy. A maximum of 200 mg of iron in 100 mL of IVIS was diluted in 200 mL of isotonic saline solution and administered as slow IV infusion. The remaining doses were given on alternate days. Infusions were given as outpatient basis in labor room with facilities for acute emergency care. Routine OI supplementation was withheld during IVIS treatment, but was restarted after 1 week.

Ferrous fumarate 300 mg with 100 mg of elemental iron was used for oral therapy. Patients were enquired about adverse effects at each visit.

Statistical package for social science (SPPS- 16) was used for statistical compilation and analysis. For statistical analysis of difference between groups, independent sample-t test, Chi square test or analysis of covariance were applied when appropriate. Statistical significance was accepted at P < 0.05.

   Results Top

Among the 100 enrolled patients, there were six dropouts in the OI group and five dropouts in the IVIS group. Flowchart 1 gives the patient distribution in each group and result of treatment with their side-effects and change in therapy in each group. [[Figure 1]: Flowchart]
Figure 1: Flowchart showing patient distribution

Click here to view

The baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were similar in the two groups, with no significant difference [Table 1]. Only one patient in the OI group had severe anemia (Hb 6.8 g/dl), while the others had moderate anemia in both the groups.
Table 1: Comparison of demographic characteristics in the two groups

Click here to view

The IVIS group had lower hemoglobin values, red cell indices and lower serum iron profile despite randomization. To overcome this confounding factor of difference in pre-treatment values, percentage increase in these variables was calculated from repeat lab parameters thus taking care of values before giving two different types of treatment [Table 2].
Table 2: Percentage increase in various parameters after treatment in the two groups

Click here to view

Reticulocyte response was better in the IVIS group as compared with the OI group. Hemoglobin improved in both groups. However, the percentage increase in hemoglobin, PCV and red cell indices after treatment was significantly higher in the IVIS group. The increase in serum ferritin and rate of increase was much higher in the IVIS group as compared with the OI group [Table 3].
Table 3: Laboratory parameters before and after treatment in the two groups

Click here to view

Target hemoglobin of 11 g/dL was attained by 66% of the patients in the IVIS group after 1 month of treatment as compared with 61% of patients in the OI group, which was not statistically significant. Highest hemoglobin attained in the IVIS group was 13 g/dL, while in the OI group was 12.2 g/dL after treatment.

One patient in the OI group with failed response was treated effectively with IVIS. Failure in another patient detected to have hypothyroidism improved only after thyroxin replacement.

There was no influence of body weight, initial hemoglobin and serum ferritin levels on percentage increase in hemoglobin in both groups. Side-effects encountered in the OI group were dyspepsia, constipation and nausea. Four of these with intolerance responded well to IVIS. One patient shifted to OI from IVIS because of giddiness after the first injection. Four patients in the IVIS group required blood transfusion for mild adverse reactions like vomiting, rashes and failure of therapy. IVIS was well tolerated by majority of the patients, with no severe anaphylactic reaction.

Hemoglobin done just prior to delivery showed no statistically significant difference (OI group 11.65 ± 0.91 g/ dL vs. IVIS group 11.76 ± 0.80 g/dL). There was no significant difference in placenta weight, birth weight, preterm labor, pre-eclampsia or gestational hypertension between the two groups (P value = 0.121-1.000).

Cost of treatment was significantly higher in the IVIS group as compared with the OI group. Cost of iron sucrose injection is Rs. 490 per 200 mg ampoule and ferrous fumarate is Rs. 1.69 per tablet. The treatment duration was significantly higher in the OI group (mean 12 weeks) as compared with the IVIS group (mean 2 weeks), with a P value of 0.000.

   Discussion Top

In this study, the efficacy, safety and tolerability of IVIS in treating pregnancy IDA was compared with OI therapy. IVIS is safe in pregnancy. It corrects anemia at short duration and replenishes iron stores better than OI. This has been the observation in other studies too. [3],[4],[5] Comparison with other studies is difficult because of different cut-offs used for lab parameters. OI preparations used are also different. As the rate of increase in hemoglobin is faster, IVIS is suitable for treatment of IDA with lower hemoglobin in the third trimester. There was a highly significant difference in the ferritin level after treatment between the two groups, with iron reserves restored only in the IVIS group, which has also been observed by Bayoumeu et al.[3] Increase in ferritin is not because of direct intravenous injection of iron complex; rather, it is because the IVIS complex releases iron rapidly to endogenous iron binding proteins with no deposition in the parenchymal tissue. It has a half-life of about 6 h. [6] This is an advantage of IVIS over iron dextran or iron gluconate.

Al Momen et al., observed that the IVIS group achieved significantly higher hemoglobin level (P value ≤ 0.001) in a shorter period (P value ≤ 0.001). [4] In a study done by Al et al., hemoglobin was different for patients in the OI and IVIS groups across time in each individual group as well as at any given point of time. The hemoglobin level was significantly higher in the IVIS group. [5] In the present study, hemoglobin within an individual group was significantly higher across time, with no difference in between both groups at any point of time.

After treatment, the IVIS group maintained hemoglobin with routine supplementation of OI in the present study, unlike in Bayoumeu et al.'s study, where no additional oral supplementation was given. Because of the high prevalence of anemia (57.9%) in pregnant women as per the National Family Health Survey-3, [7] oral supplementation even with normal iron stores is essential in India. Unlike in the parenteral iron-treated group, once the anemia is corrected with OI, absorption slows down. This is responsible for the iron stores not being replenished with OI, unlike intravenous iron.

Many Indian studies have used the intramuscular route for parenteral iron and reported side-effects such as pain, staining at injection site and arthralgia. [8],[9] IVIS cannot be given intramuscularly and does not have these side-effects.

Anemia was corrected satisfactorily in this study without the use of weight-dependent formula for calculation of iron dose. Therefore, the dose of iron sucrose used was less compared with that reported by Bayoumeu, who also used a weight-dependent formula. [3] Nevertheless, the target hemoglobin was reached. This questions whether it is really necessary to give a higher dose as calculated by weight. Parenteral iron uses calculated dose depending on the degree of deficiency, unlike OI, which has a static dose.

Various factors that influence the response to treatment of anemia were also studied. In the present study, it was seen that percentage increase in hemoglobin after 1 month of treatment was significantly related to initial hemoglobin value in both the groups. Carretti et al., observed that rise in hemoglobin was inversely correlated with initial hemoglobin value, and significantly larger proportions of high hemoglobin responses were observed after the 28 th week of gestation as compared with the second trimester. [10] This may be due to physiological hemodilution and blunted erythropoietin response of second trimester. [10] There was no direct correlation of increase in hemoglobin with period of gestation in each individual group. But, percentage increase in hemoglobin was significantly higher in the IVIS group than in the OI group in the third trimester. Thus, lower the initial value of hemoglobin in a late trimester, it is advisable to treat with IVIS.

Gastrointestinal side-effects were about 23% in the OI group, while the reported incidence varied from negligible to 31% in other studies. [3],[4],[5] Mild adverse events noted in the IVIS group were vomiting, rashes and giddiness following first dose of iron sucrose. Other studies reported unpleasant taste and fever, which were not observed in the present study. [3],[4] Because there were no serious adverse drug reactions and no episodes of anaphylaxis, we feel that it is safe for anemia in pregnancy.

Iron sucrose is costlier than OI and requires a hospital setting for administration.

The limitations of this study were that although IVIS increased serum ferritin significantly, patients were not followed-up in the post-natal period to determine whether hemoglobin levels were maintained during lactation because of higher stores. We did not repeat serum ferritin at the end of pregnancy nor during the post-natal check-up to see how long the stores last.

We conclude that OI increases hemoglobin comparably with IVIS, but does not replenish iron stores as much as IVIS. This is significant in our country where women may become anemic again during lactation, especially when their iron stores have not been corrected. However, OI is cheaper and is easy to take.

As no major adverse effects were noted with iron sucrose, it is a safe option with good efficacy for the treatment of IDA with a narrow side-effect profile.

   References Top

1.World Health Organization. The prevalence of anaemia in women: a0 tabulation of available information. 2nd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1992.  Back to cited text no. 1
2.Studd J, Tan SL, Chervenak FA, editors. Nutritional anemia during pregnancy in non- industrialised countries; In Progress in Obstetric and Gynecology, Vol. 15. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2003, p. 103-22.  Back to cited text no. 2
3.Bayoumeu F, Subiran-Buisset C, Baka NE, Legagneur H, Monnier-Barbarino P, Laxenaire MC. Iron therapy in iron deficiency anemia in pregnancy: Intravenous route versus oral route. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:518-22.  Back to cited text no. 3
4.al-Momen AK, al-Meshari A, al-Nuaim L, Saddique A, Abotalib Z, Khashogji T, et al. Intravenous iron sucrose complex in the treatment of iron deficiency anemia during pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1996;69:121-4.  Back to cited text no. 4
5.Al RA, Unlubilgin E, Kandemir O, Yalvac S, Cakir L, Haberal A. Intravenous versus oral iron for treatment of anemia in pregnancy: a0 randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol 2005;106:1335-40.  Back to cited text no. 5
6.Silverstein SB, Rodgers GM. Parenteral iron therapy options. Am J Hematol 2004;76:74-8.  Back to cited text no. 6
7.National Family Health Survey 3. India 2005-06; International Institute of Population Sciences, Mumbai, India and ORC Macro, Calverton, Maryland, USA; October 2007.  Back to cited text no. 7
8.Sharma JB, Jain S, Mallika V, Singh T, Kumar A, Arora R, et al. A prospective, partially randomized study of pregnancy outcomes and hematologic responses to oral and intramuscular iron treatment in moderately anemic pregnant women. Am J Clin Nutr 2004;79:116-22.  Back to cited text no. 8
9.Kumar A, Jain S, Singh NP, Singh T. Oral versus high dose parenteral iron supplementation in pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2005;89:7-13.  Back to cited text no. 9
10.Carretti N, Paticchio MR. Intravenous iron therapy in pregnancy anemia: Hematological response in relation to gestational age. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1999;47:217-22.  Back to cited text no. 10


  [Figure 1]

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]

This article has been cited by
1 Risk of Infection Associated With Administration of Intravenous Iron
Akshay A. Shah, Killian Donovan, Claire Seeley, Edward A. Dickson, Antony J. R. Palmer, Carolyn Doree, Susan Brunskill, Jack Reid, Austin G. Acheson, Anita Sugavanam, Edward Litton, Simon J. Stanworth
JAMA Network Open. 2021; 4(11): e2133935
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Addition of oral iron bisglycinate to intravenous iron sucrose for the treatment of postpartum anemia—randomized controlled trial
Enav Yefet, Sobhiya Mruat Rabah, Nitzan Dana Sela, Sally Hosary Mhamed, Avishag Yossef, Zohar Nachum
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2021;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Iron preparations for women of reproductive age with iron deficiency anaemia in pregnancy (FRIDA): a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Ewelina Rogozinska, Jahnavi Daru, Marios Nicolaides, Carmen Amezcua-Prieto, Susan Robinson, Rui Wang, Peter J Godolphin, Carlos Martín Saborido, Javier Zamora, Khalid S Khan, Shakila Thangaratinam
The Lancet Haematology. 2021; 8(7): e503
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Intravenous versus Oral iron for Iron-Deficiency Anemia in Pregnancy (IVIDA): A Randomized Controlled Trial
Adam K. Lewkowitz, Molly J. Stout, Emily Cooke, Seon C. Deoni, Viren D'Sa, Dwight J. Rouse, Ebony B. Carter, Methodius G. Tuuli
American Journal of Perinatology. 2021;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Iron Deficiency Anemia in Pregnancy
Andra H. James
Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2021; 138(4): 663
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
6 A quality improvement project for the cost-effective management of maternal anaemia
Katherine S. Colman, Sue Pavord, Noémi Roy
British Journal of Haematology. 2021;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
7 Protocol for the cost-effectiveness of parenteral iron and oral iron therapy for first-line management of anaemia among pregnant women in a natural programme setting in Gujarat
Somen Saha, Bharat Desai, Manish Fancy, Tapasvi Puwar, Deepak Saxena, Komal Shah, Apurvakumar Pandya
BMJ Open. 2021; 11(6): e044712
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
8 Intravenous or oral iron for treating iron deficiency anaemia during pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis
Alaa Qassim,Rosalie M Grivell,Amanda Henry,Giselle Kidson-Gerber,Antonia Shand,Luke E Grzeskowiak
Medical Journal of Australia. 2019; 211(8): 367
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
9 Intravenous compared with oral iron for the treatment of iron-deficiency anemia in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Adam K. Lewkowitz,Anjlie Gupta,Laura Simon,Bethany A. Sabol,Carrie Stoll,Emily Cooke,Roxanne A. Rampersad,Methodius G. Tuuli
Journal of Perinatology. 2019; 39(4): 519
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
10 Evaluation of postpartum anaemia screening to improve anaemia diagnosis and patient care: A prospective non-randomized before-and-after anaemia screening protocol implementation study
Enav Yefet,Abeer Suleiman,Gali Garmi,Aliza Hatokay,Zohar Nachum
Scientific Reports. 2019; 9(1)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
11 Parenteral Versus Oral Iron for Treatment of Iron Deficiency Anaemia During Pregnancy and post-partum: A Systematic Review
A. G. Radhika,Aparna Kandala Sharma,Vanamail Perumal,Anju Sinha,Vasumathi Sriganesh,Vidushi Kulshreshtha,Alka Kriplani
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India. 2019; 69(1): 13
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
12 Safety and effectiveness of intravenous iron sucrose versus standard oral iron therapy in pregnant women with moderate-to-severe anaemia in India: a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised, controlled trial
Sutapa B Neogi,Niveditha Devasenapathy,Ranjana Singh,Himanshu Bhushan,Duru Shah,Hema Divakar,Sanjay Zodpey,Sunita Malik,Smiti Nanda,Pratima Mittal,Achla Batra,Meenakshi B Chauhan,Sunita Yadav,Harsha Dongre,Sumita Saluja,Vani Malhotra,Anjali Gupta,Roopa Sangwan,A G Radhika,Alpana Singh,Sruti Bhaskaran,Mrinalini Kotru,Meera Sikka,Sonika Agarwal,Paul Francis,Kasonde Mwinga,Dinesh Baswal
The Lancet Global Health. 2019; 7(12): e1706
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
13 Safety and efficacy of intravenous iron polymaltose, iron sucrose and ferric carboxymaltose in pregnancy: A systematic review
Alaa Qassim,Ben W. Mol,Rosalie M. Grivell,Luke E. Grzeskowiak
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2018; 58(1): 22
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
14 Patient blood management in obstetrics: management of anaemia and haematinic deficiencies in pregnancy and in the post-partum period: NATA consensus statement
M. Muñoz,J. P. Peña-Rosas,S. Robinson,N. Milman,W. Holzgreve,C. Breymann,F. Goffinet,J. Nizard,F. Christory,C.-M. Samama,J.-F. Hardy
Transfusion Medicine. 2018; 28(1): 22
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
15 How I treat anemia in pregnancy: iron, cobalamin, and folate
Maureen M. Achebe,Anat Gafter-Gvili
Blood. 2017; 129(8): 940
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
16 Intravenous iron therapy for fast and efficient preoperative preparation for uterine myomectomy
Ibrahiem Sowedan,Khalid Salama,Ossama El Shaer
Evidence Based Women's Health Journal. 2015; 5(4): 195
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
17 Iron Deficiency Anemia in Pregnancy
Christian Breymann
Seminars in Hematology. 2015; 52(4): 339
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
18 The Safety of Intravenous Iron Preparations
Avni Tomer,Bieber Amir,Grossman Alon,Green Hefziba,Leibovici Leonard,Gafter-Gvili Anat
Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2015; 90(1): 12
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
19 Intravenous iron sucrose: an alternative for oral iron in pregnancy with iron deficiency anemia
Qingquan Shi,Jinhong Li,Qiang Yao,Chen Mi,Jing Yang,Aiyun Xing
Annals of Hematology. 2015; 94(3): 523
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
20 An Observational Study on the Use of IV Iron Sucrose Among Anaemic Pregnant Women in Government Healthcare Facilities from Two States of India
Niveditha Devasenapathy,Ranjana Singh,Premjeeth Moodbidri,Himanshu Bhushan,Sunanda Gupta,Sanjay P. Zodpey,Sutapa B. Neogi
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India. 2014;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
21 result 2 Document Increase in hemoglobin among the mothers at different levels of hemoglobin
Sareen, N., Bhadoria, A., Kapil, U.
Indian Journal of Community Medicine. 2013;
22 result 3 Document Safety and efficacy of intravenous iron therapy in reducing requirement for allogeneic blood transfusion: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials
Litton, E., Xiao, J., Ho, K.M.
BMJ (Online). 2013;
23 Iron deficiency anemia in pregnancy
Christian Breymann
Expert Review of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2013; 8(6): 587
[Pubmed] | [DOI]


Print this article  Email this article


    Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
  Related articles
    Article in PDF (525 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

    Materials and Me...
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded693    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 23    

Recommend this journal

  Sitemap | What's New | Copyright and Disclaimer | Privacy Notice
  © 2007 - Indian Journal of Community Medicine | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
  Online since 15th September, 2007