|
 |
|
SHORT COMMUNICATION |
|
|
|
|
| Year : 2010 | Volume
: 35
| Issue : 4 | Page : 526-528 |
| |
Health care workers and universal precautions: Perceptions and determinants of non-compliance
Anupam Kotwal, DK Taneja
Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India
| Date of Submission | 08-Dec-2009 |
| Date of Acceptance | 24-Feb-2010 |
| Date of Web Publication | 30-Dec-2010 |
Correspondence Address:
Anupam Kotwal
Intern, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi
India
 Source of Support: ICMR, New Delhi, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/0970-0218.74373
How to cite this article:
Kotwal A, Taneja D K. Health care workers and universal precautions: Perceptions and determinants of non-compliance. Indian J Community Med 2010;35:526-8 |
How to cite this URL:
Kotwal A, Taneja D K. Health care workers and universal precautions: Perceptions and determinants of non-compliance. Indian J Community Med [serial online] 2010 [cited 2020 Dec 2];35:526-8. Available from: https://www.ijcm.org.in/text.asp?2010/35/4/526/74373 |
 Introduction | |  |
Healthcare workers (HCWs) are potentially exposed to blood and body fluids (BBF) in the course of their work and therefore are at risk of infection with blood-borne pathogens. Worldwide, three million HCWs experience percutaneous exposure to blood-borne viruses each year (two million hepatitis B, 900,000 hepatitis C and 300,000 human immunodeficiency virus). [1] Exposure to BBF can occur through a percutaneous injury (needle-stick injury, NSI) or mucocutaneous incident (BBF splash). Awareness regarding this occupational risk led to the issue of guidelines by CDC as universal precautions (UPs) in 1987, later updated in 1996. [2]
Despite detailed guidelines, the knowledge and understanding of UPs among HCWs even in developed countries has been found to be inadequate. [3] In developing countries, including India, the situation is worse and occupational safety of HCWs remains a neglected issue. [4],[5]
Evidence exists that compliance with UPs reduces the risk of infections and protects healthcare practitioners. [6],[7] However, there are many reasons for poor compliance. [4] In India, very few studies, with varying focus, have been conducted in this field. Thus, the present study was conducted to assess the knowledge, attitude, practices and barriers to compliance of UPs among HCWs in LokNayak Hospital in order to target the intervention programs appropriately.
| Materials and Methods | | |
A cross-sectional survey was carried out. Nurses and interns from all wards of LokNayak Hospital were studied as they are involved in collecting blood samples and administering injections. Those working in the labour room and operation theater were excluded as they form a different exposure category.
Expecting the prevalence of correct knowledge regarding UPs to be 50%, alpha 5% and chance error ±10%, the sample size worked out to be 96; therefore, 100 HCWs, comprising of 50 nurses and 50 interns, were studied. Respondents from complete lists of both categories were selected using simple random sampling. A questionnaire was prepared based on the WHO and CDC guidelines on UPs and was pre-tested before finalization.
Institutional ethical committee clearance was obtained. Data were collected by personal interview after verbal consent. A database was created in MS Excel. Chi square test was used for comparing proportions and statistical significance was taken as P <0.05.
| Results | | |
The responses were clubbed in major domains as per the objectives of the study. A high proportion of them were very worried (67%, 95% confidence interval 56.9-76.1) about incidents of NSI and BBF splashes. The complete schedule of hepatitis B vaccine was not followed by 23% of the HCWs.
[Table 1] depicts the level of knowledge, risk perception and attitude of study subjects toward UPs. It shows that misconceptions persist despite a high level of awareness regarding UPs and that nurses had an overall low level of correct knowledge as compared with interns. [Table 2] shows statistically significant differences between interns and nurses regarding various aspects of compliance with UPs.
The perceived barriers to compliance with UPs, like too busy to use personal protective equipment (PPE) and not using PPE as colleagues do not use it, may offend patients, and discomfort in PPE use was seen to be statistically significantly higher in nurses as compared with interns (P < 0.004). The above barriers ranged between 42 and 68% for nurses and 12 and 24% for interns. However, the perceived barrier for use of PPE during emergencies was high, at 66% in both groups (P = 1.000).
A large proportion (76%, 66.4-84) felt that they were adequately trained in the use of PPE, and 85% (76.5-91.4) perceived knowing the procedure to be followed in case of an NSI. However, only 46% (36.0-56.3) had ever received training and 10% (4.9-17.6) received this training during the previous year.
Availability of PPE, sharps containers and waste segregation was commented upon in affirmative by 42% (32.2-52.3), 60% (49.7-69.7) and 69% (59.0-77.9), respectively. More nurses than doctors said that PPE (P = 0.015) and sharps containers were available (P = 0.003) and that segregation of waste at the point of generation was taking place (P = 0.000).
| Discussion | | |
This study indicates that most of the HCWs in an urban tertiary health care facility (HCF) in India possessed incomplete knowledge, as shown by other studies in developed [3] as well as developing countries, including India. [4],[5] This lack of appropriate knowledge may be a factor leading to a high level of anxiety among them regarding exposure to BBF and NSIs.
Our study findings regarding use of apron, mask and eye protection have been corroborated by a study in a tertiary HCF in Iran, although use of eye protection in their study was slightly better (6.7%). [8]
Doctors were better than nurses in almost all aspects of compliance except hand washing, as shown by other studies too. [9] Our study findings of a low level of compliance with UPs among HCWs have also been noted in other studies. [3],[4],[8] It seems probable that an incomplete understanding of the principles underlying UPs among urban tertiary HCWs affected their practices and led to reduced compliance than expected in this group.
Perceived barriers to compliance with UPs clearly influence HCW's ability and willingness to comply with them in practice. Inability to use PPE during emergencies, overwork and busy schedules have also been shown in similar settings. [5],[10] The other reasons for non-compliance overlap with those reported in studies from developed and developing countries. [3],[4],[5],[8] The level of compliance seen in this study could also be due to the low level of training received by the HCWs and the low availability of equipment, as shown by other studies. [10]
To conclude, interventions to improve UPs' compliance among HCWs in tertiary HCFs in India are urgently needed. A multifaceted approach promoting positive perception of UPs compliance should include training (initial and periodic), adequate supply of PPE, provision of hepatitis B vaccination and development of appropriate infection control and injury surveillance programmes.
Limitations of the study
Actual compliance with UPs (as opposed to self-reported compliance) is probably lower than that reported due to social desirability bias.
| Acknowledgment | | |
The authors are grateful to ICMR, New Delhi, for sanctioning the Short Term Studentship Project; Dean, MAMC; MS, LNJP Hospital; and Prof G K Ingle, HoD, Department of Community Medicine, MAMC, New Delhi.
| References | | |
| 1. | World Health Report 2002: Reducing risks, promoting healthy life. Available from: http://www.who.int/whr/en. [Last accessed on 2008Jan]. 
|
| 2. | Universal precautions for prevention of Transmission of HIV and other blood borne infections. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dhqp/bp_universal_precautions.html.[Last accessed on 2008 Jan].
|
| 3. | Roberts C. Universal Precautions: Improving the knowledge of trained nurses. Br J Nurs 2000;9:43-7.
[PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
| 4. | Kermode M, Jolley D, Langkham B, Thomas MS, Holmes W, Gifford SM. Compliance with Universal Precautions among health care workers in rural north India. Am J Infect Control 2005;33:27-33.
[PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
| 5. | Wu S, Li L, Wu Z, Cao H, Lin C, Yan Z, et al. Universal precautions in the era of HIV/AIDS: Perception of health service providers in Yunnan, China. AIDS Behav 2008;12:806-14.
[PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
| 6. | Curran E. Reducing the risk of health care acquired infection. Nurs Stand 2001;16:45-52.
|
| 7. | Sharbaugh RJ. The risk of occupational exposure and infection with infectious disease. Nurs Clin North Am 1999;34:493-506.
[PUBMED] |
| 8. | Vaziri S, Najafi F, Miri F, Jalalvandi F, Almasi A. Practice of standard precautions among health care workers in a large teaching hospital. Indian J Med Sci 2008;62:292-4.
[PUBMED]  |
| 9. | Suchitra JB, Lakshmi DN. Impact of education on Knowledge, Attitude and Practices among various categories of health care workers on nosocomial infections. Indian J Med Microbiol 2007;25:181-7.
[PUBMED] |
| 10. | Chacko J, Isaac R. Percutaneous injuries among medical interns and their knowledge and practice of post-exposure prophylaxis for HIV. Indian J Public Health 2007;51:127-9.
[PUBMED] |
[Table 1], [Table 2]
| This article has been cited by | | 1 |
Health Care Workers and Standard Precautions: Perceptions and Determinants of Compliance in the Emergency and Trauma Triage of a Tertiary Care Hospital in South India |
|
| Sangini Punia,Suma Nair,Ranjitha S. Shetty | | International Scholarly Research Notices. 2014; 2014: 1 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 2 |
result 1 Document Compliance to occupational safety measures among the paramedical workers in a tertiary hospital in Karnataka, south India |
|
| Authors of Document Phukan, P. | | International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2014; | | [Pubmed] | | | 3 |
Universal precautions in Central Asia: the need for multiple strategies in this window of opportunity |
|
| Z. Nugmanova,N. Patel,A. Nurbakhyt,G.M. Akhmetova,N. Kovtunenko,Z. Trumova,L.-A. McNutt | | Journal of Hospital Infection. 2014; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 4 |
Awareness of medical students in a medical college in Mangalore, Karnataka, India concerning infection prevention practices |
|
| Kulkarni, V. and Papanna, M.K. and Mohanty, U. and Ranjan, R. and Neelima, V. and Kumar, N. and Prasanna Mithra, P. and Upadhyay, R.P. and Unnikrishnan, B. | | Journal of Infection and Public Health. 2013; 6(4): 261-268 | | [Pubmed] | | | 5 |
Knowledge and practice of standard precautions and awareness regarding post-exposure prophylaxis for HIV among Interns of a medical college in West Bengal, India |
|
| Mukherjee, S. and Bhattacharyya, A. and SharmaSarkar, B. and Goswami, D.N. and Ghosh, S. and Samanta, A. | | Oman Medical Journal. 2013; 28(2): 141-145 | | [Pubmed] | | | 6 |
A study on awareness of æuniversal (standard) precautionsæ among interns of j.j.m. medical college, Davangere |
|
| Vidya, G.S. | | Indian Journal of Public Health Research and Development. 2013; 4(1): 233-235 | | [Pubmed] | | | 7 |
Infection control practices in health care: Teaching and learning requirements of medical undergraduates |
|
| Afreen Ayub,Ashish Goyal,Anupam Kotwal,Aniket Kulkarni,Atul Kotwal,Ajoy Mahen | | Medical Journal Armed Forces India. 2013; 69(2): 107 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 8 |
Biorisk Assessment of Medical Diagnostic Laboratories in Nigeria |
|
| Bankole Henry Oladeinde,Richard Omoregie,Ikponmwonsa Odia,Eguagie Osareniro Osakue,Odaro Stanley Imade | | Safety and Health at Work. 2013; 4(2): 100 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 9 |
Health Care Discrimination in HIV Care |
|
| Jayakumar Palanisamy,Senthilkumar Subramanian | | World Journal of AIDS. 2011; 01(03): 100 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
