HomeAboutusEditorial BoardCurrent issuearchivesSearch articlesInstructions for authorsSubscription detailsAdvertise

  Login  | Users online: 728

   Ahead of print articles    Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size  

CME Table of Contents   
Year : 2009  |  Volume : 34  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 89-93

Physical hazards in employment and pregnancy outcome

Department of Community Medicine, Maulana Azad Medical College, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110 002, India

Date of Submission19-Mar-2008
Date of Acceptance17-Oct-2008

Correspondence Address:
Bratati Banerjee
Department of Community Medicine, Maulana Azad Medical College, 2, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110 002
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0970-0218.51224

Rights and Permissions


How to cite this article:
Banerjee B. Physical hazards in employment and pregnancy outcome. Indian J Community Med 2009;34:89-93

How to cite this URL:
Banerjee B. Physical hazards in employment and pregnancy outcome. Indian J Community Med [serial online] 2009 [cited 2021 Sep 29];34:89-93. Available from: https://www.ijcm.org.in/text.asp?2009/34/2/89/51224

   Introduction Top

The past century has seen an enormous improvement in the political, social, and economic status of women, of which employment is an integral part.

Women workers require special protection while pregnant because of the following reasons: [1]

  1. The developing embryo may be more susceptible to noxious agents than the exposed mother.
  2. Females may be less suited for some work tasks than males.
  3. Pregnancy may decrease the capacity to cope with many work factors.
  4. Women tend to feed themselves less substantially than men.

   The Physiology of Work During Pregnancy Top

Physical exertion has often been suggested as a risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes, [2],[3],[4],[5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11],[12],[13],[14],[15],[16],[17],[18],[19],[20],[21] which may occur due to various factors. [4],[22],[23],[24]

  1. Work involves muscle action, causing an increase of sympathetic vasomotor activity in working muscles proportional to the severity of work. Hence, when cardiac output increases rapidly during muscular activity, most blood goes to the working muscles and proportionately less arrives in the other viscera, which during pregnancy, includes the placental bed.
  2. With hard work there is an increased release of catecholamines with resultant arteriolar constriction. With chronic hard work, lactate accumulates making any unloading of lactate from the fetus more difficult.
  3. Sweating reduces plasma volume, which is an important determinant of uteroplacental blood flow. Circulatory blood flow in the uterus and placenta decreases in the standing position.
  4. Pronounced physical exercise may lead to hormonal disturbances, hypothermia, and nutritional deficits.
  5. Shift work and irregular work schedules could lead to a change in the circadian rhythm, which affects regulation of the ovulatory cycle with resultant menstrual irregularities. Whether such shifts also influence pregnancy outcome is unknown.
  6. Heavy lifting increases intra-abdominal pressure and this may provoke uterine contractions.
  7. Heat stress causes dehydration resulting in the release of the anti-diuretic hormone and oxytocin, which stimulates the uterus to contract.

Due to the combined effects of vasoconstriction, myometrial contraction, reduced plasma volume, and diversion of blood flow away from the placental bed, there is diminution of uteroplacental blood flow and resultant fetal hypoxia. This, along with possible hormonal imbalance, may have deleterious effects on the fetus.

   Reproductive Risk Factors Top

Heavy lifting

Exposure to heavy lifting may be classified as follows: [3]

Grade Work exposure

0 - No heavy lifting at work

I - Heavy lifting (any weight), less than 10 times per week

II - Heavy lifting less than 12 kg, more than 10 times per week

III - Lifting 12 kg or more, 10 to 50 times per week

IV - Lifting 12 kg or more, more than 50 times per week

Shift work and inconvenient working hours

These may be defined as the following: [4]

Inconvenient working hours - any work outside the period of 0645 - 1745 hours.

Irregular working hours - work outside this interval, not beginning or ending at the same time each day.

Long working hours

Workers have been classified as full-time and part-time. [25]

Full time - those who work 35 hours or more per week

Part time - those who work less than 35 hours per week

Time of stopping work

Heavy lifting may have a negative effect on a child's birth weight if work is continued until the 32 nd week of pregnancy or longer. [3]

Work exposure

This may involve prolonged bending, stooping, twisting, or standing. Work may also be classified as sedentary or non sedentary based on the amount of physical work expended. [26],[27]

Other physical effort

Physical effort in any form that causes fatigue. [27]

Psychosocial stress

This has been defined as job control, job demands, and work-related physical exertion. [26]

Environmental exposure

Exposure to the extremes of temperature, noise, and vibration. [28]

   Work Fatigue Score Top

Several physical and ergonomic factors, studied as separate entities, have been considered as reproductive risk factors. Mamelle, et al. defined a fatigue scoring system by accumulating all such factors with a score of 1 allotted for the presence of each index factor as follows: [29],[30]

  1. Posture
  2. Work on machine
  3. Physical exertion
  4. Mental stress
  5. Environment

Another similar system included the following working conditions: [31]

  1. Standing for the majority of work
  2. Carrying heavy loads
  3. Working on an assembly line
  4. Performing a physically demanding job

   Women in Employment and Their Pregnancy Top

A possible influence for the motivation for employment by women is related to personal fulfillment of economic necessity - "privilege effect" or "desperation effect". Studies conducted on women of varying employment status show multiple demographic and behavioral differences. Employed women are generally younger, more highly educated, have a higher family income, are less likely to be married, have half the number of pregnancies reported by housewives, begin prenatal care earlier, miss fewer antenatal appointments, and gain more weight during pregnancy. They smoke less, both early and late in pregnancy, but light and moderate alcohol consumption is often more. [25],[32]

The hypothesis that women's increased work participation may have significant health consequences is based upon two observations. First, women do not generally shed their housekeeping and child rearing responsibilities when they enter the workforce, resulting in exhaustion. Second, pregnant working women may come in contact with an environment that may damage the fetus. [32]

   Physical Work During Pregnancy and its Hazard to the Fetus Top

Women in various occupations have been found to be at an increased risk of experiencing a fetal death. Of all the sectors observed, risk was highest for those employed in the textile industry. [5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11],[12],[13],[14],[15],[16],[17],[18],[19],[20],[21]

The significant work factors directly correlated with adverse pregnancy outcomes included: fewer household helpers, standing at work for more than 7 hours per day, working in hot environments, commuting, walking, and carrying and lifting heavy weight. [2],[33],[34],[35]

A meta-analysis has shown physically demanding work to be significantly associated with pre-term birth. Other occupational exposures significantly associated included prolonged standing, shift and night work, and a high cumulative work fatigue score. No significant association was found between long work hours and pre-term birth. [36]

Standing at work and lifting heavy weight, though often not significant, have been seen to be associated with pregnancy loss and pre-term birth, especially in women whose nutrition status is compromised. [5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[18],[37],[38],[39],[40]

Risk of pregnancy loss has been observed to be higher among women with a fixed evening work schedule in comparison with women with a fixed day schedule, and twice as high among those on a fixed night schedule. The highest abortion rate has also been seen in workers who reported irregular working hours and rotating shifts. [41],[42],[43] Effects of rotating shift work on both gestational age and birth weight have also been found to be significant. [44]

Women working more than 45 hours per week are 5 times more likely to report high stress as those working less than 35 hours per week. [42],[45],[46],[47]

Environmental influence on pregnancy outcome has also been observed. Long-term whole body vibration exposures and working in extremely cold environments can contribute to disturbances of pregnancy causing abortion and stillbirth. [16],[48] Occupational noise above 85-90 dB was associated with a decline in birth weight. [49],[50]

Some studies, however, have not reported higher risks, and employed women sometimes have been observed to have fewer previous miscarriages or perinatal deaths when compared with housewives. Also, the higher rate of previous miscarriages among working women than non working women, observed in one study, had disappeared when adjusted for parity. [32],[51],[52]

The risk of employment on delivering a low birth weight infant has also been negated by many authors. No difference was observed in these aspects between economically active women compared with inactive women, or in women with stress, anxiety, depression, and physical strain due to employment, than in those without. [53],[54],[55],[56]

   Validity of the Studies Top

Studies of occupational exposures and reproductive health have reported varied results. This may be due to the following reasons: [57]

  1. Many studies are small in terms of the number of women exposed and the number of abnormal outcomes.
  2. The number of potential association investigated is large and as a result some may appear 'statistically significant'.
  3. A large number of non-occupational factors, many still unknown, affect the pregnancy outcome.
  4. Reasons for traumatic events, such as fetal death or serious defect, may be influenced by the traumatic experience.

Several types of potential bias also threaten the validity of such studies. [25],[58]

1. Healthy pregnant worker effect

  • Favorable social, economic, and behavioral aspects of employment, like income from employment, better health insurance coverage, better prenatal care, and a more healthy lifestyle, are expected to be associated with favorable pregnancy outcomes among working women.
  • Women with severe illness or mental incapacity may be selected out of the workforce leaving healthier working women with the possibility of better reproductive outcomes.
  • Women with a history of adverse reproductive outcomes avoid employment for fear of repeated pregnancy problems.

2. Unhealthy pregnant worker effect

  • Women who have healthy infants may stop work while their children are young, whereas women who fail to produce a surviving infant may be more likely to continue working.

These studies are often affected by recall bias and 75% of recorded abortions are recalled. Recall failure is influenced by factors such as the time elapsed since the event, total number of births or spontaneous abortions, the woman's age at the time of pregnancy, times in a woman's life when abortions occur, and the gestational age of the fetus at the time of abortion. Medical treatment received and hospital admission might emphasize the event and facilitate recall. Social class and education are other factors that may affect the completeness of the recall. Also, there are chances of misrepresentation of exposure data obtained by the self-administered questionnaire. [3],[59],[60]

   Recommendations Top

During work, some inevitable adverse conditions may arise. Various authors have suggested measures to make these conditions more bearable and less harmful for the pregnant worker and their children. [61],[62],[63],[64],[65] Accordingly, the following recommendations may be made:

  1. Food - Reproductive risks are more pronounced in malnourished women, therefore, supplementary nutrition may be given to all pregnant working women to provide a part of their daily calorie and protein requirement.
  2. Rest - Rest rooms should be provided near the workplace where pregnant women can rest when fatigued. Pregnant women should also be allowed 10 minutes rest after every 1 hour of work. Rush hours can be avoided by coming after the beginning of the shift and leaving after the shift is over.
  3. Leave - Leave rules should be brought to the knowledge of all workers and they should be advised to avail such leaves.
  4. Antenatal care - Antenatal clinics may be arranged within factory premises or several smaller establishments together may hold an antenatal clinic regularly. Women should be allowed paid time off to attend these clinics and travel assistance should be provided for referred cases. Investigations and medications should be provided by the employer. One health worker may be engaged to regularly visit the pregnant women.
  5. Intra natal and post natal care - In India, these are generally rendered by ESI hospitals. Vehicles should be provided to attend the hospital during an emergency. For others, traveling allowance should be sanctioned.
  6. Family planning - Such clinics may be held within the premises for distributing temporary contraceptive devices.
  7. Risk factors - Measures should be adopted to avoid exposure of pregnant women to work conditions considered to be reproductive risk factors. All female workers should be trained for working in all departments where women are usually posted. Pregnant women should be assigned work with the least physical strain, and allotted work in fixed day shifts only, throughout their pregnancy. Sitting arrangements, fans, cool drinking water, and ear muffs should be provided.
  8. Orientation programs - Such programs should be held regularly for all women workers for the purpose of generating awareness and motivating them to utilize available facilities. The employer and managerial and supervisory staff should have adequate knowledge of the issue and they should see that the facilities are being availed properly, without misuse by ineligible workers.
  9. Awareness of community - Mass media can be used to improve the knowledge of all employers and employees regarding reproductive health.
  10. Research -Reproductive research should be promoted. Governmental and non governmental research organizations should be given more assistance for work in this sphere.

   References Top

1.Park's textbook of preventive and social medicine. 17 th ed. Jabalpur, India: M/S Banarsidas Bhanot Publishers; 2007.   Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Chamberlain G. Effect of work during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1985;65:747-50.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Ahlborg G, Bodin L, Hogstedt C. Heavy lifting during pregnancy: A hazard to the fetus? Int J Epidemiol 1990;19:90-7.  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Axelsson G, Rylander R, Molin I. Outcome of pregnancy in relation to irregular and inconvenient work schedules. Br J Ind Med 1989;46:393-8.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Banerjee B, Dey TK, Chatterjee P. Work related physical exertion and spontaneous abortion. Indian J Public Health 2005;49:248-9.  Back to cited text no. 5    
6.Banerjee B. Work exposure during pregnancy and its hazard to the fetus. Indian J Occup Environ Med 2003;7:33-6.  Back to cited text no. 6    
7.Banerjee B, Chatterjee P. Effect of maternal employment on the early neonate. Indian J Occup Environ Med 2002;6:169-70.  Back to cited text no. 7    
8.Banerjee B, Dey TK, Chatterjee. Estimation of risk of pregnancy wastage due to lifting of heavy weight during pregnancy. Indian J Occup Environ Med 2002;6:13-5.  Back to cited text no. 8    
9.Banerjee B, Chatterjee P, Dey TK. Perinatal mortality in employed women. Indian J Community Med 2003;28:112-6.  Back to cited text no. 9    
10.Minja Kim Choe, Seung-Kwon Kim. Pregnancy wastage among married women in South Korea. Asian Population Studies 2007;3:37-55.  Back to cited text no. 10    
11.Figα-Talamanca I. Spontaneous abortions among female industrial workers. Int Arch Occup Int Health 1984;54:163-71.  Back to cited text no. 11    
12.Goulet L, Theriault G. Association between spontaneous abortion and ergonomic factors: A literature review of the epidemiologic evidence. Scand J Work Environ Health 1987;13:399-403.   Back to cited text no. 12    
13.Florack EI, Zielhuis GA, Pellegrino JE, Rolland R. Occupational physical activity and the occurrence of spontaneous abortion. Int J Epidemiol 1993;22:878-84.  Back to cited text no. 13    
14.McDonald AD, Armstrong B, Cherry NM, Delorme C, Diodati-Nolin A, McDonald JC, et al . Spontaneous abortion and occupation. J Occup Med 1986;28:1232-8.   Back to cited text no. 14    
15.McDonald AD, McDonald JC, Armstrong B, Cherry NM, Nolin AD, Robert D. Prematurity and work in pregnancy. Br J Ind Med 1988;45:56-62.   Back to cited text no. 15    
16.McDonald AD, McDonald JC, Armstrong B, Cherry NM, Delorme C, Nolin AD, et al . Occupation and pregnancy outcome. Br J Ind Med 1987;44:521-6.   Back to cited text no. 16    
17.Vaughan TL, Daling JR, Starzyk PM. Fetal death and maternal occupation. J Occup Med 1984;26:676-8.  Back to cited text no. 17    
18.Makowiec-Dcabrowska T, Seidlecka J. Physical exertion at work and the course and outcome of pregnancy. Med Pract 1996;47:629-49.  Back to cited text no. 18    
19.Tamakoshi A, Ohno Y, Tomoda Y, Mizutani H, Kurauchi O, Maruyama T, et al . Maternal working status and low birth weight: Findings from a cohort study. Nippon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi 1994;46:503-8.   Back to cited text no. 19    
20.Kumar R, Kumar V. Effect of physical work during pregnancy on birth weight. Indian J Pediatr 1987;54:805-9.  Back to cited text no. 20    
21.Ramji S. Socioeconomic and environmental determinants of perinatal and neonatal mortality in India. Indian Pediatr 1989;26:1100-5.  Back to cited text no. 21    
22.Lajinian S, Hudson S, Applewhite L, Feldman J, Minkoff HL. An association between the heat-humidity index and preterm labor and delivery: a preliminary analysis. Am J Pub Health 1997;87:1205-7.  Back to cited text no. 22    
23.Zenz C. Occupational medicine. Principles and practical applications. In: Dickerson BO, Horvath EP, editors. 2 nd ed. Pub Mosby; 1988.   Back to cited text no. 23    
24.Chamberlain GV. Work in pregnancy. Am J Ind Med 1993;23:559-75.  Back to cited text no. 24    
25.Savitz DA, Whelan EA, Rowland AS, Kleckner RC. Maternal employment and reproductive risk factors. Am J Epidemiol 1990;132:933-45.  Back to cited text no. 25    
26.Magann EF, Nolan TE. Pregnancy outcome in an active-duty population. Obstet Gynecol 1991;78:391-3.  Back to cited text no. 26    
27.Murphy JF, Dauncey M, Newcombe R, Garcia J, Elbourne D. Employment in pregnancy: Prevalence, maternal characteristics, perinatal outcome. Lancet 1984;1:1163-6.  Back to cited text no. 27    
28.McDonald A. Work and pregnancy in epidemiology of work related diseases. In: McDonald C, editor. London: BMJ Publishing Group; 1995. p. 293-323.  Back to cited text no. 28    
29.Mamelle N, Laumon B, Lazar P. Prematurity and occupational activity during pregnancy. Am J Epidemiol 1984;119:309-22.  Back to cited text no. 29    
30.Mamelle N, Munoz F. Occupational working conditions and preterm birth: A reliable scoring system. Am J Epidemiol 1987;126:150-2.  Back to cited text no. 30    
31.Gabbe SG, Turner LP. Reproductive hazards of the American lifestyle: Work during pregnancy. Am J Obstetr Gynecol 1997;176:826-32.  Back to cited text no. 31    
32.Najman JM, Morrison J, Williams GM, Anderson MJ, Keeping JD. The employment of mothers and the outcomes of their pregnancies: An Australian study. Public Health 1989;103:189-98.  Back to cited text no. 32    
33.Fenster L, Hubbard AE, Windham GC, Walker KO, Swan SH. A prospective study of work related physical exertion and spontaneous abortion. Epidemiology 1997;8:66-74.  Back to cited text no. 33    
34.Senturia KD. A woman's work is never done: Women's work and pregnancy outcome in Albania. Med Anthropol 1997;11:375-95.  Back to cited text no. 34    
35.Gold EB, Tomich E. Occupational hazards to fertility and pregnancy outcome. Occup Med 1994;9:435-69.  Back to cited text no. 35    
36.Mozurkewich EL, Luke B, Avni M, Wolf FM. Working conditions and adverse pregnancy outcome: A meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:623-35.   Back to cited text no. 36    
37.Spinillo A, Capuzzo E, Baltaro F, Piazza G, Nicola S, Iasci A. The effect of work activity in pregnancy on the risk of fetal growth retardation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1996;75:531-6.  Back to cited text no. 37    
38.Henriksen TB, Hedegaard M, Secher NJ, Wilcox AJ. Standing at work and preterm delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995;102:198-206.  Back to cited text no. 38    
39.Sternfield B. Physical activity and pregnancy outcome: Review and recommendations. Sports Med 1997;23:33-47.  Back to cited text no. 39    
40.Koemeester AP, Broersen JP, Treffers PE. Physical workload and gestational age at delivery. Occup Environ med 1995;52:313-5.  Back to cited text no. 40    
41.Infante-Rivard C, David M, Gauthier R, Rivard GE. Pregnancy loss and work schedule during pregnancy. Epidemiology 1993;4:73-5.  Back to cited text no. 41    
42.Axelsson G, Rylander R, Molin I. Outcome of pregnancy in relation to irregular and inconvenient work schedules. Br J Ind Med 1989;46:393-8.  Back to cited text no. 42    
43.Armstrong BG, Nolin AD, McDonald AD. Work in pregnancy and birth weight for gestational age. Br J Ind Med 1989;46:196-9.  Back to cited text no. 43    
44.Xu X, Ding M, Li B, Christiani DC. Association of rotating shift work with preterm birth and low birth weight among never smoking women textile workers in China. Occup Environ Med 1994;51:470-4.   Back to cited text no. 44    
45.Schenker MB, Eaton M, Green R, Samuel S. Self reported stress and reproductive of female lawyers. J Occup Environ Med 1997;39:556-68.  Back to cited text no. 45    
46.Ceron-Mireles P, Harlow SD, Sanchez-Carillo CI. The risk of prematurity and small-for-gestational-age birth in Mexico city: The effects of working conditions and antenatal leave. Am J Public Health 1996;86:825-31.  Back to cited text no. 46    
47.Savitz DA, Brett KM, Baird NJ, Tse CK. Male and female employment in the textile industry in relation to miscarriage and preterm delivery. Am J Ind Med 1996;30:307-16.  Back to cited text no. 47    
48.Seidel H. Selected health risks caused by long-term whole-body vibration. Am J Ind Med 1993;23:589-604.  Back to cited text no. 48    
49.Nurminen T. Female noise exposure, shift work and reproduction. J Occup Environ Med 1995;37:945-50.  Back to cited text no. 49    
50.Hartikainen AL, Sorri M, Anttonen H, Tuimala R, Laara E. Effect of occupational noise on the course and outcome of pregnancy. Scand J Work Environ and Health 1994;20:444-50.  Back to cited text no. 50    
51.Savitz DA, Brett KM, Dole N, Tse CK. Male and female occupation in relation to miscarriage and preterm delivery in Central North Carolina. Ann Epidemiol 1997;7: 509-16.  Back to cited text no. 51    
52.Marbury MC, Linn S, Monson RR, Wegman DH, Schoenbaum SC, Stubblefield PG, et al . Work and pregnancy. J Occup Med 1984;26:415-21.  Back to cited text no. 52    
53.Henriksen TB, Savitz DA, Hedegaard M, Secher NJ. Employment during pregnancy in relation to risk factors and pregnancy outcome. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1994;101:858-65.  Back to cited text no. 53    
54.Barnes DL, Adair LS, Popkin BM. Women's physical activity and pregnancy outcome: A longitudinal analysis from the Philippines. Int J Epidemiol 1991;20:162-72.  Back to cited text no. 54    
55.Jacobsen G, Schei B, Hoffman HJ. Psychosocial factors and small-for-gestational-age infants among parous Scandinavian women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl 1997;165:14-8.  Back to cited text no. 55    
56.Zuckerman BS, Frank DA, Hingson R, Morelock S, Kayne HL. Impact of maternal work outside the home during pregnancy on neonatal outcome. Pediatrics 1986;77:459-64.  Back to cited text no. 56    
57.Work and pregnancy. Br J Ind Med 1988;45:577-80.  Back to cited text no. 57    
58.Axelsson G. Selection bias in studies of spontaneous abortion among occupational groups. J Occup Med 1984;26:525-8.  Back to cited text no. 58    
59.Wilcox AJ, Horney LF. Accuracy of spontaneous recall. Am J Epidemiol 1984;120:727-33.  Back to cited text no. 59    
60.Ahlborg GA Jr. Validity of exposure data obtained by questionnaire. Scand J Work Environ Health 1990;16:284-8.  Back to cited text no. 60    
61.Bond MB. Role of corporate policy in the control of reproductive hazards of the workplace. J Occup Med 1986;28:193-5.  Back to cited text no. 61    
62.Chamberlain G, Garcia J. Pregnant women at work. Lancet 1983;1:228-9.   Back to cited text no. 62    
63.Dutta DC. Textbook of obstetrics. 6 th ed. Konar H, editor. Kolkata, India: Pub New Central Book Agency (P) Ltd; 2004.   Back to cited text no. 63    
64.Indulski JA, Baranski B, Kowalski Z, Mikoajczyk H, Makowiec-Dabrowska T. Project for amending regulations regarding jobs prohibited to women. Med Pract 1992;43:453-7.  Back to cited text no. 64    
65.Sareen IB, Tilak VW, Sharma M. Women and occupational health. Indian J Ind Med 1997;43:34-8.  Back to cited text no. 65    

This article has been cited by
1 Pregnant womenæs experiences of social roles: An ethnophenomenological study
FatemehErfanian Arghavanian,RobabLatifnejad Roudsari,Abbas Heydari,MohsenNoghani Dokht Bahmani
Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research. 2020; 25(1): 31
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Manual handling of burdens as a predictor of birth outcome—a Finnish Birth Register Study
Emma Kwegyir-Afful,Reeta Lamminpää,Tuomas Selander,Mika Gissler,Katri Vehviläinen-Julkunen,Seppo Heinonen,Markku Sallmen,Kimmo Räsänen
European Journal of Public Health. 2018; 28(6): 1122
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 A Liftless Intervention to Prevent Preterm Birth and Low Birthweight Among Pregnant Ghanaian Women: Protocol of a Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
Emma Kwegyir-Afful,Jos Verbeek,Lydia Aziato,Joseph D Seffah,Kimmo Räsänen
JMIR Research Protocols. 2018; 7(8): e10095
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 A Grounded Theory Study of How Nurses Integrate Pregnancy and Full-Time Employment
Paul Quinn
Nursing Research. 2016; 65(3): 170
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Prenatal, perinatal and neonatal risk factors of Autism Spectrum Disorder: A comprehensive epidemiological assessment from India
Madhu Poornima Mamidala,Anupama Polinedi,Praveen Kumar P.T.V.,N. Rajesh,OmSai Ramesh Vallamkonda,Vrajesh Udani,Nidhi Singhal,Vidya Rajesh
Research in Developmental Disabilities. 2013; 34(9): 3004
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
6 Occupational Reproductive Health and Pregnancy Hazards Confronting Health Care Workers
Cynthia Gonzalez
AAOHN Journal. 2011; 59(9): 373
[VIEW] | [DOI]
7 Occupational Reproductive Health and Pregnancy Hazards Confronting Health Care Workers
Cynthia Gonzalez
AAOHN Journal. 2011; 59(9): 373
[Pubmed] | [DOI]


Print this article  Email this article


    Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
    Article in PDF (113 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

    The Physiology o...
    Reproductive Ris...
    Work Fatigue Score
    Women in Employm...
    Physical Work Du...
    Validity of the ...

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded488    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 7    

Recommend this journal

  Sitemap | What's New | Feedback | Copyright and Disclaimer
  © 2007 - Indian Journal of Community Medicine | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
  Online since 15th September, 2007