HomeAboutusEditorial BoardCurrent issuearchivesSearch articlesInstructions for authorsSubscription detailsAdvertise

  Login  | Users online: 336

   Ahead of print articles    Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size  


 
 Table of Contents    
VIEW POINT  
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 44  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 303-306
 

Controversies in cough management: An Indian perspective


ChanRe Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

Date of Submission24-Apr-2019
Date of Acceptance23-Sep-2019
Date of Web Publication12-Nov-2019

Correspondence Address:
Ms. Dhanya Mohan
ChanRe Rheumatology and Immunology Center, 414, 20th Main Rd, 3rd Block, West of Chord Road, 2nd Stage, Nagapura, Bengaluru - 560 010, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijcm.IJCM_174_19

Rights and Permissions

 

   Abstract 


Chronic cough is one of the most common symptoms for patients-seeking consultation in an outpatient clinic. It is associated with substantial psychological, physical, and social burdens and impaired quality of life. This review highlights some of the major diagnostic and management challenges confronted in the field of cough with a special focus on the Indian perspective. Heterogeneity in definitions and classifications and challenges associated with over-the-counter drug use and irrational drug use are some of the major controversies. Streamlined diagnostic approach involving a combination of subjective and objective tools, evidence-based amendments in clinical practice, and stringent implementation of regulatory guidelines are mandatory to address controversies in cough management in developing countries.


Keywords: Antitussive, chronic cough, expectorant, over-the-counter, tuberculosis


How to cite this article:
Mohan D. Controversies in cough management: An Indian perspective. Indian J Community Med 2019;44:303-6

How to cite this URL:
Mohan D. Controversies in cough management: An Indian perspective. Indian J Community Med [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Dec 6];44:303-6. Available from: http://www.ijcm.org.in/text.asp?2019/44/4/303/270799





   Introduction Top


Chronic cough without identifiable causes, even after basic evaluation, is one of the most common reasons for referral to specialty clinics, and it can be due to respiratory or nonrespiratory causes.[1] It poses a major challenge to both clinicians and patients due to the complexity in the diagnosis and the physical, social, and psychological burdens. Persistent/high-intensity coughing may cause considerable morbidity such as chest pain, fractured ribs, exhaustion, dizziness, lightheadedness, urinary incontinence, sleep interference, and work absenteeism.[2]

A cross-sectional European survey involving 1120 participants has noted that only 53% had achieved a diagnosis, of the 70% of the respondents who had ≥three consultations for chronic cough. Most of the respondents judged the treatment as having limited or no effectiveness.[3] In India, around 70% of the individuals with cough undergo empirical therapy without a definite diagnosis.[4]


   Cough: Heterogeneity in Definitions and Classifications Top


Literature evidence reports the CHEST's 2006 Cough Guidelines and management algorithms as useful for classifying, diagnosing, and treating patients with cough worldwide.[5] The classification proposed by the algorithm is as follows: acute cough – <3 weeks, subacute cough – 3–8 weeks, and chronic cough – >8 weeks. However, the range reported in diverse studies and by patients presenting to the clinic are of larger duration.[6] A 2015 systematic review and meta-analysis has highlighted the need for developing an international consensus definition. The researchers considered 19 different definitions for scrutinizing the data from more than 80% of the epidemiological studies. It was noted that most of the studies had adopted 3 months as the cutoff for the duration of chronic cough, whereas the cutoff proposed by the current guidelines is 8 weeks.[7]


   Assessment Challenges and the Need for Extensive Investigations Top


Varying success rates of chronic cough management noted in the primary research studies could be attributed to the lack of fidelity to the core principles of diagnostic/therapeutic interventions.[8] The “anatomic diagnostic protocol” put forth by Irwin et al. suggests considering the following diagnostic triad in most of the cases: rhinitis, eosinophilic airway inflammation, and gastroesophageal reflux disease.[9]

However, the practical implementation of this protocol in the clinical practice is associated with several discrepancies. Nearly 12%–42% did not belong to any of the categories, despite extensive investigations. A cough may not be the common presentation in some patients with these conditions; in individuals having cough as prominent symptoms, the prognosis of specific treatment is uncertain. Reported success rates of this protocol have been <58%, and the reasons are still elusive. Moreover, the pathogenetic implications of these conditions in cough are unclear.[1],[2],[9]

A 2018 review by Perotin et al. has presented an overview of currently available recommendations and has summarized the following steps in chronic cough management [Table 1].[10]
Table 1: Steps in chronic cough management recommended by the international guidelines

Click here to view


The current international recommendations on cough diagnosis are customized for specialty care, and they are not compatible to address the diagnostic challenges in developing countries.[4] Faruqi and Song have reported that the etiology and risk factors for chronic cough in tropical regions can be quite different from those reported from other parts. The risk factors that can be considered in an Indian perspective include bidi smoking, outdoor air pollution, and biofuel.[11] Affordability, unavailability, and prolonged waiting for definite diagnoses are the other major challenges confronted in the Indian primary settings, as opposed to the international recommendations.[12] To circumvent these shortcomings, experts from across India have put forth a consensus document to provide a systematic approach for effective cough management. The document advocates aggressive investigations with the presence of red flag signs [Table 2]. These signs have also been recommended by the 2018 American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP), CHEST Expert Cough Panel.[4]
Table 2: Red flag signs for aggressive investigations

Click here to view



   Subjective Versus Objective Measurements Top


The use of cough diary scores, visual analog scales, subjective quality-of-life questionnaires, and objective ambulatory cough monitoring systems has significantly improved the assessment of chronic cough. The cough-specific quality-of-life questionnaire and the Leicester cough questionnaire and the cough-specific quality-of-life questionnaire are the commonly used validated questionnaires.[2] Although the need for objective measures of cough severity has been highlighted in the European Respiratory Society guidelines, the optimal assessment strategy is still unknown.[1]

Several studies have underscored the significance of a combination approach of subjective and objective measurements. However, there are no guidelines recommending the same. Moreover, there are very limited studies comparing subjective and objective cough measures.[2] The diagnostic importance of cough intensity, rhythm, nature, and frequency has not been clearly explored. Cough frequency may be indicative of the disease prognosis following treatment. However, there is a paucity of data from the clinical trials evaluating the cough frequency or its effects on the quality of life.[12]


   Treatment-Related Controversies Top


Watchful waiting is generally recommended for managing children having chronic dry cough, without any cough pointers (signs, symptoms, and simple investigations). Distinguishing nonspecific from specific cough might be clinically useful for deciding on watchful waiting. However, the definition of chronic cough in children is controversial. The British Thoracic Society guidelines have defined the duration of chronic cough in children as >8 weeks, as opposed to >4 weeks recommended by the ACCP guidelines. This recommendation is intended to provide a period of the resolution, without any specific treatment, if the cough is associated with a simple head cold persisting for 2–3 weeks. In contrast, ACCP and Australian and ACCP guidelines have defined chronic cough duration as >4 weeks.[13],[14]


   Challenges Associated With Over-The-Counter Drug Use Top


Abuse of over-the-counter (OTC) cough products has been recognized as an international concern. There are limited research and studies quantifying the scale of abuse. The use of opioids among substance abusers in India is estimated to be around 0.4%–26%. Studies have indicated that abuse in the majority of the cases was initiated as a part of recreational activities through friends, whereas very few had started the consumption as a treatment of chest/cough problems.[15]


   Drug Use in Specific Population Top


Several studies have raised concerns on the potential benefits of OTC cough medications in children <6 years of age and the direct and indirect associations of their ingredients with pediatric morbidity and mortality.[16] Several medical governing bodies in Australia, Europe, and the USA and medical experts in international chronic cough guidelines have consistently highlighted the lack of sufficient evidence on the efficacy and safety of codeine-based medications in managing childhood chronic cough. Despite the warnings and policy amendments by the Food and Drug Administration and ACCP, children between 2 and 5 years, followed by children <2 years, have been identified as common users of such medications.[17] A cross-sectional Indian study has underscored the need to create awareness among pediatricians regarding the cautious prescription of cough and cold medications. The present study has noted that data on the prescription pattern of these medications from India are very limited, and there are medication overuse, regardless of the patient' age, hospital setting, or seniority of the physician.[18]

The cough reflux in the elderly may be compromised due to aging or illness, and overuse of cough suppressants in such patients may modify the cough response. The medications may decrease the airway clearance due to suppression of the cough center, thereby increasing the risk of aspiration pneumonia.[19]


   Irrational Drug Use Top


A 2011 study has noted 72% increase in the number of cough and cold medications in the Indian drug market from 2011. The number of banned cough and cold medications had increased from 9 in 2001 to 27 in 2007. Many of the preparations had constituents with antagonistic actions and more than one ingredient belonging to the same pharmacological group. Rationality assessment revealed that most of the cough and cold preparations were irrational without any recorded benefits.[20] Unconventional combinations of formulations (e.g., cough medications with cough suppressant + expectorant two or more antihistamines + decongestant + bronchodilator) increase the risks of adverse events and associated morbidities.[21]

Availability of a large number of irrational drugs in the Indian drug market is mainly due to the nonrevision of legal provisions and lack of stringent implementation of policy guidelines.[21] A 2016 literature review has noted that irrational drug use in India is extensive and multifactorial. The present study highlighted the need of addressing the issue at all levels of health systems and has suggested the following:[22]

  • Evaluation of the interplay by the policy-makers at the systemic, provider, dispenser, and consumer levels
  • Conducting awareness campaigns for public, pharmacists, and clinicians regarding the risks of inappropriate use
  • Further research to identify the effective strategies to tackle social factors associated with irrational use.



   Conclusion Top


Amendment of international guidelines and validation of the streamlined diagnostic approach involving a combination of subjective and objective tools through further research are warranted to address the diagnostic challenges in developing countries. Developing consensus and conducting longitudinal studies and clinical trials for evidence-based amendments in clinical practice are necessary to address treatment-related controversies. Harmonization of licensing procedure, stringent enforcement of regulatory guidelines, and good pharmacovigilance are mandatory to prevent irrational use of fixed-dose combination in India.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Birring SS. Controversies in the evaluation and management of chronic cough. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;183:708-15.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Mahashur A. Chronic dry cough: Diagnostic and management approaches. Lung India 2015;32:44-9.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
3.
Chamberlain SA, Garrod R, Douiri A, Masefield S, Powell P, Bücher C, et al. The impact of chronic cough: A cross-sectional European survey. Lung 2015;193:401-8.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Guleria R, Dhar R, Mahashur A, Ghoshal AG, Jindal SK, Talwar D, et al. Indian consensus on diagnosis of cough at primary care setting. J Assoc Physicians India 2019;67:92-8.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Irwin RS, French CL, Chang AB, Altman KW; CHEST Expert Cough Panel. Classification of cough as a symptom in adults and management algorithms: CHEST guideline and expert panel report. Chest 2018;153:196-209.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Faruqi S, Murdoch RD, Allum F, Morice AH. On the definition of chronic cough and current treatment pathways: An international qualitative study. Cough 2014;10:5.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Song WJ, Chang YS, Faruqi S, Kim JY, Kang MG, Kim S, et al. The global epidemiology of chronic cough in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Respir J 2015;45:1479-81.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
French CT, Diekemper RL, Irwin RS, Adams TM, Altman KW, Barker AF, et al. Assessment of intervention fidelity and recommendations for researchers conducting studies on the diagnosis and treatment of chronic cough in the adult: CHEST guideline and expert panel report. Chest 2015;148:32-54.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Song WJ, Chang YS, Morice AH. Changing the paradigm for cough: Does 'cough hypersensitivity' aid our understanding? Asia Pac Allergy 2014;4:3-13.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Perotin JM, Launois C, Dewolf M, Dumazet A, Dury S, Lebargy F, et al. Managing patients with chronic cough: Challenges and solutions. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2018;14:1041-51.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Faruqi S, Song WJ. Chronic cough: An Indian perspective. Lung India 2015;32:668-9.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
12.
Leconte S, Ferrant D, Dory V, Degryse J. Validated methods of cough assessment: A systematic review of the literature. Respiration 2011;81:161-74.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Chang AB, Van Asperen PP, Glasgow N, Robertson CF, Mellis CM, Masters IB, et al. Children with chronic cough: When is watchful waiting appropriate? Development of likelihood ratios for assessing children with chronic cough. Chest 2015;147:745-53.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Chang AB, Oppenheimer JJ, Weinberger MM, Rubin BK, Weir K, Grant CC, et al. Use of management pathways or algorithms in children with chronic cough: CHEST guideline and expert panel report. Chest 2017;151:875-83.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Anil SS, Ratnakaran B, Suresh N. A case report of over-the-counter codeine dependence as consequence of self-medication for premature ejaculation. J Family Med Prim Care 2017;6:867-9.  Back to cited text no. 15
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
16.
Shefrin AE, Goldman RD. Use of over-the-counter cough and cold medications in children. Can Fam Physician 2009;55:1081-3.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Gardiner SJ, Chang AB, Marchant JM, Petsky HL. Codeine versus placebo for chronic cough in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;7:CD011914.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Chandelia S, Dhankar M, Salhan M. Pediatrician's cough and cold medication prescription for hypothetical cases – A cross-sectional multi-centric study. Saudi Pharm J 2016;24:176-81.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Committee for The Japanese Respiratory Society Guidelines for Management of Cough. Cough in specific populations (paediatric patients, elderly patients and patients with underlying disease). Respirology 2006;11:S175-86.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Roy V, Malhotra R, Tayal V, Bansal A, Gupta KS. Fixed-dose combinations for cough and common cold in India: An assessment of availability and rationality. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 2011;25:258-66.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Gupta YK, Ramachandran SS. Fixed dose drug combinations: Issues and challenges in India. Indian J Pharmacol 2016;48:347-9.  Back to cited text no. 21
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
22.
Porter G, Grills N. Medication misuse in India: A major public health issue in India. J Public Health (Oxf) 2016;38:e150-7.  Back to cited text no. 22
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
           

    

 
   Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
  Related articles
    Article in PDF (317 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
    Cough: Heterogen...
    Assessment Chall...
    Subjective Versu...
    Treatment-Relate...
    Challenges Assoc...
    Drug Use in Spec...
   Irrational Drug Use
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed545    
    Printed11    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded61    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

  Sitemap | What's New | Feedback | Copyright and Disclaimer
  2007 - Indian Journal of Community Medicine | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
  Online since 15th September, 2007