HomeAboutusEditorial BoardCurrent issuearchivesSearch articlesInstructions for authorsSubscription detailsAdvertise

  Login  | Users online: 199

   Ahead of print articles    Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size  


 
 Table of Contents    
LETTER TO EDITOR  
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 43  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 325-326
 

Utility of mid-upper arm circumference in detection of maternal acute malnutrition


1 Department of Public Health Nutrition, Human Nutrition Unit, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
2 Department of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India

Date of Submission14-Sep-2018
Date of Acceptance27-Nov-2018
Date of Web Publication21-Dec-2018

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Umesh Kapil
Department of Public Health Nutrition, Human Nutrition Unit, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Old OT Block, New Delhi - 110 029
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijcm.IJCM_285_18

Rights and Permissions

 



How to cite this article:
Kapil U, Bhadoria AS. Utility of mid-upper arm circumference in detection of maternal acute malnutrition. Indian J Community Med 2018;43:325-6

How to cite this URL:
Kapil U, Bhadoria AS. Utility of mid-upper arm circumference in detection of maternal acute malnutrition. Indian J Community Med [serial online] 2018 [cited 2019 Jan 21];43:325-6. Available from: http://www.ijcm.org.in/text.asp?2018/43/4/325/248195




Sir,

The recent publication entitled “Screening Maternal Acute Malnutrition Using Adult Mid-Upper Arm Circumference (MUAC) in Resource-Poor Settings”[1] supported by the UNICEF in your journal was informative and useful. However, few scientific issues need clarification for the benefits of public health practitioners, research scientists, program implementers, and health administrators.

  1. The researchers have justified measuring MUAC instead of height to assess acute maternal malnutrition, as the former takes comparatively less time than the latter. According to them, using nonstretchable adult MUAC tape “an average measuring time taken per person for MUAC was 54 s whereas for height using stadiometer was 59 s.” Authors have referred their earlier study in support of this justification. This is an important issue as it raises concern about validity of results obtained in both present and earlier study. Real time consumed in measuring height and MUAC at community-level research study should be much more as it involves many additional steps that need to be addressed. These steps include visiting a house, identifying an indexed subject, self-introduction, obtaining informed consent, taking tools out for measurements and taking measurements, adjustment of clothes/footwear, and recording it in duplicate or triplicate
  2. Researchers identified 84% specificity in mothers screened with MUAC <23 cm. This cutoff could detect high proportion of “false-positive” women with acute malnutrition that may pose additional high burden on treatment/interventions for managing malnourished mothers
  3. Authors have referred nine studies in to support their results. Out of them, five are unpublished concerning validity of recommendations made in the present study
  4. Authors recommended “Care packages for those mothers who have very low MUAC on their nutrition as well as fetal stunting.” Does the study suggest provision of nutrition supplements/therapeutic foods for mothers screened positive for acute malnutrition? If yes, what specific interventions can be given to these identified mothers? If no, then why should mothers screened for acute malnourishment
  5. The present study revealed “those with MUAC <23 and <21 cm were 48% and 14%, respectively.” Diagnostic accuracy between MUAC cutoff of <23 cm and body mass index (BMI) of <18.5 kg/m2 as the gold standard. It would be more meaningful if BMI <16 kg/m2 would be taken as the gold standard as suggested in a previously published data.[2] It recommended BMI <16 kg/m2 to assess severe acute malnutrition in adults (nonpregnant and nonpostpartum). It further added that if BMI cannot be assessed, then MUAC <19 cm should be identified[2]
  6. A recently completed seven countries study on pregnant women, four from Africa (Democratic Republic of Congo, Ethiopia, Malawi, and South Africa) and three from South Asia (Bangladesh, Nepal, and Pakistan) concluded that based on the wide variability of sensitivity and specificity between studies, it may be difficult to recommend a MUAC cutoff that would be suitable in all settings.[3]


Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
   References Top

1.
Kumar P, Sareen N, Agrawal S, Kathuria N, Yadav S, Sethi V, et al. Screening maternal acute malnutrition using adult mid‑upper arm circumference in resource‑poor settings. Indian J Community Med 2018;43:132‑4.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Nutrition Care Plan C2: Outpatient Care of Adults with SAM. Algorithm for Managing Malnutrition in Adults. p. 3. Available from: http://www.fantaproject.org/sites/default/files/resources/Namibia%20flipchart%20algorithm%20adults_Sept2010.pdf. [Last accessed on 2018 Jul 16].   Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Tang AM, Chung M, Dong K, Wanke C, Bahwere P, Bose K, et al. Determining a Global Mid‑Upper Arm Circumference Cutoff to Assess Underweight in Adults (Men and Nonpregnant Women). FHI 360/FANTA. Washington, DC; 2017. Available from: https://www.fantaproject. org/sites/default/files/resources/Global‑MUAC‑Cutoffs‑non Pregnant‑Adults‑Jun2017.pdf. [Last accessed on 2018 Jul 16].  Back to cited text no. 3
    




 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
           

    

 
   Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
    Article in PDF (239 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Response from th...
   References
    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed119    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded49    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

  Sitemap | What's New | Feedback | Copyright and Disclaimer
  2007 - Indian Journal of Community Medicine | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
  Online since 15th September, 2007