HomeAboutusCurrent issuearchivesSearch articlesInstructions for authorsSubscription detailsAdvertise

  Login  | Users online: 644

   Ahead of print articles    Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size  


 
 Table of Contents    
LETTER TO EDITOR  
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 38  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 185-186
 

Modified kuppuswamy's socioeconomic scale: social researcher should include updated income criteria, 2012


1 Department of Community Medicine, UCMS and GTB Hospital, Delhi, India
2 Department of Community Medicine, Pt B D Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak, India

Date of Web Publication8-Aug-2013

Correspondence Address:
Mohan Bairwa
Department of Community Medicine, UCMS and GTB Hospital, Delhi
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0970-0218.116358

Rights and Permissions

 



How to cite this article:
Bairwa M, Rajput M, Sachdeva S. Modified kuppuswamy's socioeconomic scale: social researcher should include updated income criteria, 2012. Indian J Community Med 2013;38:185-6

How to cite this URL:
Bairwa M, Rajput M, Sachdeva S. Modified kuppuswamy's socioeconomic scale: social researcher should include updated income criteria, 2012. Indian J Community Med [serial online] 2013 [cited 2017 May 25];38:185-6. Available from: http://www.ijcm.org.in/text.asp?2013/38/3/185/116358


Sir,

Socioeconomic status (SES) is one of the most important social determinants of health and disease, thus, widely studied constructs in the social sciences. Usually composite scales are used to measure SES, which has a combination of social and economic variables. Several ways of measuring SES have been suggested for categorizing different rural and urban populations in last decades.

The most widely used scale for urban populations is Kuppuswamy's socioeconomic scale, which was devised by Kuppuswamy in 1976. Kuppuswamy scale is a composite score of education and occupation of the head of the family along with monthly income of the family, which yields a score of 3-29. This scale classifies the study populations into high, middle, and low SES [Table 1]. [1] Usually education and occupation of head of family are not changeable with time. However, the income ranges in the scale lose their relevance following the depreciation in the value of the rupee. [2] Steady inflation, lower interest rates, and country's current account deficits are the main factors contributing to fall in the value of currency. Therefore, it is needed to update the scale regularly for socioeconomic classification of study populations. In the past, Kumar [3] had tried to update Prasad Scale's income limits using consumer price index (CPI) as a first attempt of its kind. In this letter, we attempted to link income limits of the Kuppuswamy socioeconomic scale with CPI and revised the scale. Such linking of the scale with price index not only makes it relevant and meaningful but also provides a built in opportunity for its constant updating in future.
Table 1: Kuppuswamy socioeconomic scale (Urban, 1976)(1)


Click here to view


The family income per month (in rupees) for 1976 was calculated according to base year 1960 = 100 (using the price index for 1976: 296). These price indexes entail that anything that costs Rs. 100 in 1960 would cost Rs. 296 in 1976. The price indexes were updated for 1982 and again in 2001 assuming them as base year (100). [4] The scale has been revised previously by Mishra et al., for 1998 price index, [2] Kumar et al., [5] and Patro et al. [6] Keeping the changing socioeconomic circumstances in mind, income criteria in this paper again revised using the base year of 2001 for All India CPI numbers for industrial workers on base 2001 = 100 (CPI-IW). [3] Price index for 2001 according to 1982 base (100) was 458. As per criteria of 1960 (old base), the price index for 1982 was updated at 490. Therefore, we get price index of 1976 converted to new base:

  • Price index for 1982 by 1960 base = 490
  • Price index for 1982 by 1982 base = 100
  • Price index for 1976 by 1960 base = 296
  • Price index for 1976 by 1982 base = 296 χ 490/100 = 60.408.


This means the item which costs Rs. 100 in 1982 was Rs. 60.4 in 1976. Conversion factor for the year 1982 would be 4.90 (296 χ 60.408). Conversion factor takes into account the increase in base price index for which it is calculated. Considering the new base (2001), price index for current year (2012) is used to establish new ranges of income. Updated conversion factor can be established using same exercise as follows:

  • Price index by old base (1982) for 1998 = 405
  • Price index for 2001 by new base (2001) = 100
  • Price index by new base (2001) for 1998 = 405 χ 458/100 = 88.428
  • Price index by new base (2001) for 2012 = 208.


Conversion factor for the year 2012 can be achieved by dividing the price index (2012) by 88.428. CPI-IW (base 2001 = 100) shows reference index numbers as 208 on June 2012 as per Labour Bureau, Government of India. [4] Price index was 88.42 for 1998 and 208 for 2012 so conversion factor with 2001 as new base will be 2.35 (208 χ 88.42) [Table 2]. [1],[2],[4],[5]
Table 2: Family income (Rs.) per month in the original and modified Kuppuswamy scale#


Click here to view


This revised method for SES has limitations. Educational and occupational factors need to be revised by using suitable survey methods. [2] The total family income is being used in this scale, itself is a limiting factor as it does not take into account the family size. In today's time with shrinking family size, best expressed with double income no kid syndrome; a small family with same income will enjoy an upward social mobility. However, this exercise will provide good understanding for deciding the income group in the scale considering the latest available CPI values.

The researchers need to take note of regular update of the CPI values available from Labor Bureau website before exercising socioeconomic classification of their study population in research.


   Acknowledgments Top


The authors are thankful to Sumit Chawla and Manju Pilania, Pt. B D Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak for understanding of the calculations of price indexes.

 
   References Top

1.Kuppuswamy B. Manual of Socioeconomic Status (Urban), 1 st ed. Delhi: Manasayan; 1981. p. 66-72.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Mishra D, Singh HP. Kuppuswamy's socioeconomic status scale - A revision. Indian J Pediatr 2003;70:273-4.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.Kumar P. Social classification - Need for constant updating. Indian J Community Med 1993;18:60-1.  Back to cited text no. 3
  Medknow Journal  
4.Labour Bureau, Ministry of Labour, Government of India. Linking factors between new series and old Series. Available from: http://labourbureau.nic.in/indexes.htm. [Last accessed on 2012 Aug 7].  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Kumar N, Shekhar C, Kumar P, Kundu AS. Kuppuswamy's socioeconomic status scale - Updating for 2007. Indian J Pediatr 2007;74:1131-2.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.Patro BK, Jeyashree K, Gupta PK. Kuppuswamy's socioeconomic status scale 2010 the need for periodic revision. Indian J Pediatr 2012;79:395-6.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]


This article has been cited by
1 Prevalence and factors associated with depressive symptoms among post-partum mothers in Nepal
Rajendra Kumar Giri,Resham Bahadur Khatri,Shiva Raj Mishra,Vishnu Khanal,Vidya Dev Sharma,Ritu Prasad Gartoula
BMC Research Notes. 2015; 8(1)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Medical adherence and its predictors in Diabetes Mellitus patients attending government hospitals in the Indian Capital, Delhi, 2013: a cross sectional study
Saurav Basu,Megha Khobragade,Anil Kumar,D. K. Raut
International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries. 2015;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Prevalence and factors associated with childhood overweight/obesity of private school children in Nepal
M. Koirala,R.B. Khatri,V. Khanal,A. Amatya
Obesity Research & Clinical Practice. 2014;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Microvascular Complications and Their Associated Risk Factors in Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients
Dipika Bansal,Kapil Gudala,Hari Prasad Esam,Ramya Nayakallu,Raja Vikram Vyamusani,Anil Bhansali
International Journal of Chronic Diseases. 2014; 2014: 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Urogenital Infections as a Risk Factor for Preterm Labor: A Hospital-Based Case–Control Study
Indu Verma,Kumkum Avasthi,Vandana Berry
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India. 2014;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
           

    

 
   Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
    Article in PDF (303 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


   Acknowledgments
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed40658    
    Printed113    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded2020    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 5    

Recommend this journal

  Sitemap | What's New | Feedback | Copyright and Disclaimer
  © 2007 - Indian Journal of Community Medicine | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
  Online since 15th September, 2007