HomeAboutusEditorial BoardCurrent issuearchivesSearch articlesInstructions for authorsSubscription detailsAdvertise

  Login  | Users online: 748

   Ahead of print articles    Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size  


 
 Table of Contents    
LETTER TO EDITOR  
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 37  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 201-202
 

Waste management in dental office


1 Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dental Sciences, CSM Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
2 Department of Prosthodontics, Jaipur Dental College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
3 Department of Prosthodontics, Dhanvantri Charitable Hospital, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India

Date of Web Publication21-Aug-2012

Correspondence Address:
Bhaskar Agarwal
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dental Sciences, CSM Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0970-0218.99934

Rights and Permissions

 



How to cite this article:
Agarwal B, Singh SV, Bhansali S, Agarwal S. Waste management in dental office. Indian J Community Med 2012;37:201-2

How to cite this URL:
Agarwal B, Singh SV, Bhansali S, Agarwal S. Waste management in dental office. Indian J Community Med [serial online] 2012 [cited 2019 Jul 15];37:201-2. Available from: http://www.ijcm.org.in/text.asp?2012/37/3/201/99934


Sir,

There are a number of hazardous dental wastes that when disposed improperly, could cause harm to us and the environment. Most chemical waste streams generated in dental office can be managed as nonhazardous waste, if proper disposal guidelines are followed. These include:

Mercury-containing wastes

Dental Amalgam particles are a source of mercury which is known to be a neurotoxic, nephrotoxic, and bioaccumulative element. It can get into the environment through waste water, scrap amalgam or vapors. Vaporous mercury waste management includes: (1) storing unused elemental mercury in a tightly sealed container, (2) contacting a certified biomedical waste carrier (CWC) for recycling or disposal, (3) using a "mercury spill kit" in case of a spill of mercury, (4) reacting unused elemental mercury with silver alloy to form scrap amalgam, (5) not placing elemental mercury in the garbage, and (6) not washing elemental mercury down the drain. Scrap amalgam waste management entails (1) using disposable suction traps and amalgam separators on dental suction units, the traps should be changed weekly to prevent amalgam accumulation, (2) mixing only required amalgam amount or using premeasured amalgam capsules, (3) Not throwing extracted teeth with amalgam fillings in the regular garbage, (4) using a mercury container to store all scrap/old amalgam, which is passed on to the CWC. [1],[2]

Silver-containing wastes

(A) Spent X-ray fixer used in dental clinics to develop X-rays is a hazardous material that should not be simply rinsed down the drain. After desilvering the fixer with a recovery unit, it can be mixed with developer and water and disposed down the sewer or septic system. Spent developer is permitted to be discharged in the above systems after dilution with water. The silver should be handed over to the CWC. Using a digital X-ray unit and an X-ray cleaner without chromium are other suggested safety measures. (B) Undeveloped X-ray films contain a high level of silver and must be treated as hazardous waste. It is advisable to collect any unused film that needs disposing in a recommended container for recycling by the disposal company. Using a digital X-ray unit minimizes purchase of new X-ray films. [1],[2]

Lead-containing wastes

The lead foil inside X-ray packets and lead aprons contain leachable toxin which can contaminate soil and groundwater in landfill sites after disposal. These should only be handed over to CWC. High doses of lead intake lead to reproductive toxicity, neurotoxicity, carcinogenicity, hypertension, renal function, immunology, toxicokinetics, etc. [3]

Blood-soaked/dripping gauze

Is a biomedical hazardous waste. It should be enclosed in a yellow biomedical waste bag covered with a double bag, labeled with a biohazard symbol and refrigerated, if onsite for more than 4 days. Once accumulated, a CWC should be contacted for disposal. [4]

Sharps

(Needles, scalpels, glass carpules, burs, acid etch tips, files, blades and other sharp objects): Their waste management includes collection in a red or yellow puncture resistant container with a lid that cannot be removed. The container should be properly labeled with biohazard symbol and once full, the CWC should be contacted for disposal. [5]

Chemicals, disinfectants, and sterilizing agents

Staff handling these materials should be trained in Workplace Hazardous Materials Information System (WHMIS). Whenever possible, use steam or dry heat to sterilize dental instruments. Nonchlorinated plastic containers (not PVC) should be preferred to minimize environmental impacts and placed in the solid waste stream. Halogenated sterilants have a detrimental effect on environment. Ignitable sterilants should not be poured down the drain as they have potency to explode. HCHO sterilants should also not be disposed down a drain. One should not pour sterilants into a septic system as this may significantly disrupt the bacteria which normally breakdown wastes. [4],[5]

Nonhazardous wastes

(Paper, cardboard, aluminum, plastics, etc.): Their use should be minimized. Containers or packaging made of PVC plastic should be avoided where feasible, as this is difficult to recycle and can produce acid gases if incinerated. Paper waste, cardboard, and plastic containers (clean or rinsed) should be recycled where the service exists. [4]

We wish to emphasize that in addition to health risks, improper waste management also has an impact on the environment causing pollution of water, air, and soil. The need of the day is to sensitize the dentists to the various types of waste, their generation, segregation, collection, transportation, and final disposal.

 
   References Top

1.Hörsted-Bindslev P. Amalgam toxicity-environmental and occupational hazards. J Dent 2004;32:359-65.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Clifton JC 2nd. Mercury exposure and public health. Pediatr Clin North Am 2007;54:237-69, viii. Review.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Gidlow DA. Lead Toxicity. Occup Med (Lond) 2004;54:76-81.   Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Pasupathi P, Sindhu S, Ponnusha BS, Ambika A. Biomedical waste management for health care industry. Int J Biol Med Res 2011;2: 472-86.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Blenkharn JI. Standards of clinical waste management in UK hospitals. J Hosp Infect 2006;62:300-3.  Back to cited text no. 5
    




 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
           

    

 
   Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
    Article in PDF (255 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2047    
    Printed45    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded182    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

  Sitemap | What's New | Feedback | Copyright and Disclaimer
  2007 - Indian Journal of Community Medicine | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
  Online since 15th September, 2007