HomeAboutusCurrent issuearchivesSearch articlesInstructions for authorsSubscription detailsAdvertise

  Login  | Users online: 30

   Ahead of print articles    Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size  


 
 Table of Contents    
ORIGINAL ARTICLE  
Year : 2011  |  Volume : 36  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 263-267
 

Lifestyle and gallstone disease: Scope for primary prevention


1 Department of Community Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India
2 Department of Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India

Date of Submission15-Jun-2010
Date of Acceptance22-Sep-2011
Date of Web Publication3-Jan-2012

Correspondence Address:
Sandeep Sachdeva
3/115 A, Durgabadi, Marris Road, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id


DOI: 10.4103/0970-0218.91327

PMID: 22279255

Get Permissions

 

   Abstract 

Objective : To study the antecedent risk factors in the causation of gallstone disease in a hospital-based case control study. Materials and Methods: Cases (n = 150) from all age groups and both sexes with sonographically proven gallstones were recruited over a duration of 3 months from the surgical wards of a tertiary care teaching hospital. Modes of presentation were also noted among cases. Age- and sex-matched controls (n = 150) were chosen from among ward inmates admitted for other reasons. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed for selected sociodemographic, dietary, and lifestyle-related variables. Results : Females had a higher prevalence of gallstone disease than males (P < 0.01). Among males, the geriatric age group (>60 years) was relatively more susceptible (28%). Prepubertal age group was least afflicted (3.3%). Univariate analysis revealed multiparity, high fat, refined sugar, and low fiber intakes to be significantly associated with gallstones. Sedentary habits, recent stress, and hypertension were also among the significant lifestyle-related factors. High body mass index and waist hip ratios, again representing unhealthy lifestyles, were the significant anthropometric covariates. However, only three of these, viz., physical inactivity, high saturated fats, and high waist hip ratio emerged as significant predictors on stepwise logistic regression analysis (P < 0.05). Conclusion : Gallstone disease is frequent among females and elderly males. Significant predictor variables are abdominal adiposity, inadequate physical activity, and high intake of saturated fats; thus representing high risk lifestyles and yet amenable to primary prevention.


Keywords: Gallstone, lifestyle, risk factors


How to cite this article:
Sachdeva S, Khan Z, Ansari M A, Khalique N, Anees A. Lifestyle and gallstone disease: Scope for primary prevention. Indian J Community Med 2011;36:263-7

How to cite this URL:
Sachdeva S, Khan Z, Ansari M A, Khalique N, Anees A. Lifestyle and gallstone disease: Scope for primary prevention. Indian J Community Med [serial online] 2011 [cited 2014 Sep 15];36:263-7. Available from: http://www.ijcm.org.in/text.asp?2011/36/4/263/91327



   Introduction Top


Once considered a disease of the Western world and the affluent, cholelithiasis has increasingly become a major cause of abdominal morbidity, leading to hospital admission in the developing world. [1],[2] Its occurrence has been found to be at least 7.4% in the adult population of North India. [3] There has also been a remarkable shift in the trend of gall-stone disease from middle aged, fertile, fat females to young asthenic females in their twenties. [4] The increasing magnitude and epidemiologic shifts in the natural history of gallstone disease in India qualify for the need of research in different geographical areas, and also to explore the predictor variables. This is particularly because a majority of risk factors associated with gallstone disease are potentially modifiable. The present study is therefore aimed at quantifying the sociodemographic and lifestyle risk factors for gallstones among age- and sex-matched cases and controls. Besides, an ancillary observation is made regarding the various modes of presentation and complications of gallstone disease among different age groups.


   Materials and Methods Top


In the present case control study, 150 cases were recruited from cholelithiasis patients (proven by sonography) admitted in the surgical wards of JN Medical College Hospital, Aligarh, from January to April 2010. Their clinical presentations were noted from the records. Age- and sex-matched controls (n = 150) comprising of patients admitted for other morbidities and sonographically negative for gallstones were simultaneously recruited from the same wards. Tools for data collection were interview, clinical examination (including anthropometry), and investigations (estimation of hemoglobin, fasting blood sugar, and serum lipids). A pretested questionairre incorporating personal and sociodemographic details was administered to both groups. Modified Prasad's classification was used to categorize the social class. [5] Dietary information was derived from a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire. [6] Participants were asked to indicate their frequency of consumption, on average, of typical servings of selected foods during the previous month. Nutrient intakes were calculated by multiplying the frequency of consumption of each unit of food from the semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire by the nutrient content of the specified portion according to food composition. [7] Anthropometric indices (weight, height, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, and waist hip ratio) were calculated for all cases and controls. Comorbidities such as recent stress (operationally defined as a persistent physical or psychological stimulus occurring over the past 6 months and causing impairment of activities of daily living) and current smoking were looked for. Physical activity was gauged as moderate (indulgence per day of 60 min or more in activities such as brisk walking/domestic chores/carrying or moving loads up to 20 kg) and vigorous (running/cycling/swimming/carrying or moving loads above 20kg) [www.who.int WHO Health topics]. Anything short of moderate physical activity was considered sedentary. Clinical presentations and complication(s) were recorded among different age groups of cases from individual records. Binary logistic regression was used for multivariate analysis.


   Results Top


[Table 1] presents the baseline clinical and personal characteristics of age-and sex-matched cases and controls. The mean age of cases and controls was 41.5 ± 15.4 and 38.5 ± 15.1 years, respectively. Mean values of key anthropometric indices and systolic and diastolic blood pressure levels were higher among cases than those in controls. As many as twice known diabetic, hypertensive and hyperlipidemic individuals were present among cases vis-a-vis controls.(10% vs. 5%, 19% vs. 10%, and 7% vs. 4% respectively). [Table 2] depicts a female preponderance among cases (61%) as compared to males (39%). Among females, the age group most affected was 45-60 years (38.5%) and above 60 years in males (20.8%). Children under 15 years were afflicted the least among both males and females (5.1% and 2.2%, respectively). The difference in the prevalence of gallstones among the two sexes was statistically significant (P < 0.01). A large proportion of cases were asymptomatic (47%) or remained largely subclinical as chronic cholecystitis or early malignancy with nonspecific symptoms (29%). Overtly manifest cases with or without complications constituted just the tip of the iceberg (24%) [Figure 1]. [Table 3] shows that multiparity was more commonly found in female cases than controls (63 and 50, respectively) and the difference was statistically significant (unadjusted OR = 0.5; 95% CI 0.3-0.9). Also, significantly more cases were observed in those who had had recent episode(s) of stress (unadjusted OR = 2.7; 95% CI 1.4-5.4) and in those with sedentary habits (unadjusted OR = 4.2; 95% CI 2.5-6.7). Interestingly, intake of less protein in diet was significantly associated with cholelithiasis [Table 4]. Further investigation revealed consumption of predominantly animal protein (68%) relative to vegetable protein (32%) among cases (not depicted). More than recommended intakes of saturated fats (unadjusted OR = 0.3; 95% CI 0.2-0.5) and unsaturated fats (unadjusted OR = 0.5; 95% CI 0.3-0.8), refined sugar (unadjusted OR = 0.2; 95% CI 0.1-0.4), and salt (unadjusted OR = 2.9; 95% CI 1.6-5.2) were significantly more in cases [Table 4]. Similarly, the odds of cases were more in favor of those consuming less fiber in diet (unadjusted OR = 0.2; 95% CI 0.1-0.4). Significantly more cases were overweight or obese (BMI > 25) in comparison to controls (unadjusted OR = 0.3; 95% CI 0.2-0.5).Waist hip ratio more than 0.85 was also a significant marker for cholelithiasis (unadjusted OR = 0.4; 95% CI 0.2-0.7). Another clinical variant that emerged significant in favor of cases was known hypertension (unadjusted OR = 2.2; 95% CI 1.1-4.2). [Table 5] represents a model for binary logistic regression of selected variables and obviates the influence of potential confounding factors from the outcome of univariate analysis. Factors that emerged significant in their decreasing order were inadequate physical activity (P = 0.01), high waist hip ratio (P = 0.03), and excessive intake of saturated fats (P = 0.04).
Table 1: Baseline characteristics of cases and controls. The values are mean ± 1 SD or percentage.


Click here to view
Table 2: Age and sex distribution of cases. Figures in parentheses indicate percentages


Click here to view
Table 3: Univariate analysis of selected demographic and behavioral variables of cholelithiasis among cases and controls


Click here to view
Table 4: Univariate analysis of dietary and comorbid variables of cholelithiasis among cases and controls.


Click here to view
Table 5: Stepwise binary logistic model for multivariate analysis of selected variables


Click here to view
Figure 1: Disease iceberg depicting spectrum of clinical presentation of gallstones among cases.

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


A higher prevalence of cholelithiasis among females, observed in the present study, has been corroborated by several authors. [8],[9] Pregnancy and sex hormones are believed to place women at a higher risk, and the view has been supported by several classical epidemiologic studies. [10],[11] Estrogen increases biliary cholesterol secretion causing cholesterol super saturation of bile rendering it lithogenic. A relatively higher prevalence of 39% among males when compared to reports from past studies [12] is an indicator of significant shift in the epidemiology of gallstone disease. Maximal affliction of elderly males (28.8%) was corroborated by Chari et al. [13] However, these figures in males may well be an underestimation as most cases are asymptomatic. [13] Asymptomatic cholelithiasis was a common occurrence among cases in our study as well [Figure 1]. Gallstones were least common in the prepubertal age as supported by coworkers. [14] None of the children in the present study had clinical evidence of hemolysis that could have led to gallstone formation. This makes a case for suspecting gallstone disease in all children under appropriate clinical scenarios, even in the absence of predisposing hemolytic anemias. Multiparous females had a significantly higher occurrence of gallstones. The view has been supported by several researchers. [15],[16] Dietary factors have been widely believed to play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of gallstone disease. High total fat, especially of animal origin (as in our cases) in diet, may lead to loss of bile acids in feces and decreased bile acid pool promoting supersaturation of bile and rendering it more lithogenic. The landmark Framingham Heart Study [10] has also shown that population given increased amounts of polyunsaturated fats have a twofold risk of developing gallstones. The MICOL study however showed no such association. [17] Low fiber intake and high refined sugars were similarly associated with tendency to gallstones as documented in other studies. [18] Dietary fiber decreases gut transit time, so there is less time for colonic bacteria to produce secondary bile acids and less bile acids are thereby absorbed. Low protein intake of plant origin was also a significant factor on univariate analysis. It has been proposed that vegetable protein exerted an inhibitory effect on biliary cholesterol crystallization, which is the determinant step in gallstone genesis. [19],[20] A high waist hip ratio (>0.80) suggestive of abdominal adiposity emerged a positive deviant towards gallstone disease in multivariate analysis. Chung et al.[21] have documented a higher multivariate relative risk for men with a WHR ≥ 0.99 than those with WHR < 0.89. Similar association was observed with body mass indices in overweight and higher ranges. A sedentary lifestyle or physical inactivity was also an important determinant of gallstone disease. Indeed, there have been consistent experimental and epidemiologic data for a protective effect; so much so to suggest a causal association. Paul et al. demonstrated in their large prospective cohort study that the highest level of physical activity was associated with a 70% decreased risk of symptomatic gallstones after 5 years. [22]

Comorbid conditions such as hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia were frequently found in cases but only hypertension was significantly associated with gallstones in univariate analysis. The association of gallstones with recent stress (physical and/or psychological), noted in the present study, could be a result of the well-documented association of stress and hypertension. However, independent association between the two (stress and gallstones) has been documented by Kuta et al. [23] Few authors have suggested that certain mental stressors are associated with an elevation of serum cholesterol levels and hypercholesterolemia in turn predisposes to gallstone formation. [24]


   Conclusion Top


Gallstones are more common in females and among elderly males, many cases being asymptomatic. High intake of refined sugar and low vegetable protein favor gallstone formation. Consumption of excessive saturated fats coupled with less physical activity and high waist hip ratio were the most significant predictors and point toward unhealthy lifestyle practices. The present study being age and sex matched, falls short of analyzing each of the variables separately in both genders. However, it is a sensitizing exercise for health care providers and hypothesizes the notion that gallstones is a lifestyle disease with potentially modifiable risk factors as in several other chronic diseases (such as coronary heart disease, obesity, and hypertension). Majority of the risk factors are amenable to primary prevention. Screening and surveillance of these risk factors can be incorporated into the primary health care system. Further studies are however needed to identify additional predictors of cholelithiasis, particularly asymptomatic disease.

 
   References Top

1.Shaffer EA. Gallstone disease: Epidemiology of gallbladder stone disease. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2006;20:981-96.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Khuroo MS, Mahajan R, Zargar SA, Javid G, Sapru S. Prevalence of biliary tract disease in India: a sonographic study in adult population in Kashmir. Gut 1989;30:201-5.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
3.Tandon RK. Prevalence and type of biliary stones in India. World J Gastroenterol 2000;6:4-5.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Gupta RL, Sharma SB, Kumar SP, Monika. "Changing trends (clinico-biochemical) in gall- bladder stone disease"-an observation. Indian J Med Sci 1998;52:309-16.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.AK Agarwal. Social classification. The need to update in the present scenario. Ind J Comm Med 2008;33:50-51.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Willett WC. Nutritional epidemiology. 2 nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1998.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.US Department of Agriculture. Composition of foods-raw, processed, and prepared, 1963-1992. (Agricultural handbook no. 8). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1993.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Farzaneh Sheikh Ahmad E, Zavvareh HT, Gharadaghi J, Sheikhvatan M. Prevalence and characteristics of gallstone disease in an Iranian population: a study on cadavers. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2007;6:509-12.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
9.Sun H, Tang H, Jiang S, Zeng L, Chen EQ, Zhou TY, et al. Gender and metabolic differences of gallstone diseases. World J Gastroenterol 2009;15:1886-91.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
10.Friedman GD, Kannel WB, Dawber TR. The epidemiology of gallbladder disease: observations in the Framingham Study. J Chronic Dis 1966;19:273-92.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]    
11.Barbara L, Sama C, Morselli Labate AM, Taroni F, Rusticali AG, Festi D, et al. A population study on the prevalence of gallstones disease: the Sirmione Study. Hepatology 1987;7:913-7.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]    
12.Muhrbeck O, Ahberg J. Prevalence of gallstone disease in a Swedish population. Scand J Gastroenterol 1995;30:1125-8.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Chari RS, Shah SA. Biliary system. In: Townsend CM, Beauchamp RD, Evers BM, Mattox KL, editors. Sabiston Textbook of Surgery. Chap 54. 18 th ed. St. Louis, MO: WB Saunders; 2007.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Honore LH. Cholesterol cholelithiasis in adolescent females: its connection with obestiy, parity, and oral contraceptive use--a retrospective study of 31 cases. Arch Surg 1980;115:62-4.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.Singh V, Trikha B, Nain C, Singh K, Bose S. Epidemiology of gallstone disease in Chandigarh: a community-based study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2001;16:560-3.  Back to cited text no. 15
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
16.Sarin SK, Kapur BM, Tandon RK. Cholesterol and pigment gallstones in northern India. A prospective analysis. Dig Dis Sci 1986;31:1041-5.  Back to cited text no. 16
[PUBMED]    
17.Aftill AF, Scafato E, Marchioi R, Marfisi RA, Festi D. Diet and gallstones in Italy: the cross-sectional MICOL results. Hepatology 1998;27:1492-8.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.Cuevas A, Miquel JF, Reyes MS, Zanlungo S, Nervi F. Diet as a risk factor for cholesterol gallstone disease. J Am Coll Nutr 2004;23:187-96.  Back to cited text no. 18
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
19.Tsai CJ, Leitzmann MF, Willett WC, Giovannucci EL. Dietary protein and the risk of cholecystectomy in a cohort of US women: the Nurses' Health Study. Am J Epidemiol 2004;160:11-8.  Back to cited text no. 19
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
20.Catala I, Juste C, Boehler N, Férézou J, André M, Riottot M, et al. Cholesterol crystallization in gall-bladder bile of pigs given cholesterol-beta-cyclodextrin-enriched diets with either casein or soyabean concentrate as protein sources. Br J Nutr 2000;83:411-20.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.Tsai CJ, Leitzmann MF, Willett WC, Giovannucci EL. Prospective study of abdominal adiposity and gallstone disease in US men. Am J Clin Nutr 2004;80:38-44.  Back to cited text no. 21
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
22.Banim PJ, Luben RN, Wareham NJ, Sharp SJ, Khaw KT, Hart AR. Physical activity reduces the risk of symptomatic gallstones: a prospective cohort study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010;22:983-8.  Back to cited text no. 22
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
23.Kuta C, Abbaspour A, Yim GK: Effect of chronic stress on gallstone formation in mice. Pharmacologist 1984;26:187.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.Bryant HU, Story JA, Yim GK. Assessment of endogenous opioid mediation in stress-induced hypercholesterolemia in the rat. Psychosom Med 1988;50:576-85.  Back to cited text no. 24
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]


This article has been cited by
1 Risk profile for gallstone disease in southern Indian population: Is there anything new?
Alexander Palapatti Chandran,Ramya Sivarajan,Vijaya Srinivasan,M. Srinivas,V. Jayanthi
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology. 2014;
[Pubmed]
2 Assessment of gallstone predictor: comparative analysis of ultrasonographic and biochemical parameters
Hafiz Muhammad Aslam,Shafaq Saleem,Muhammad Muzzammil Edhi,Hiba Arshad Shaikh,Jehanzeb Daniel khan,Mehak Hafiz,Maria Saleem
International Archives of Medicine. 2013; 6(1): 17
[Pubmed]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
           

    

 
   Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
  Related articles
    Article in PDF (665 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1577    
    Printed56    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded211    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 2    

Recommend this journal

  Sitemap | What's New | Feedback | Copyright and Disclaimer
  2007 - Indian Journal of Community Medicine | Published by Medknow
  Online since 15th September, 2007