HomeAboutusEditorial BoardCurrent issuearchivesSearch articlesInstructions for authorsSubscription detailsAdvertise

  Login  | Users online: 2603

   Ahead of print articles    Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size  


 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Table of Contents   
Year : 2010  |  Volume : 35  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 52-56
 

Measuring patient satisfaction: A case study to improve quality of care at public health facilities


1 Department of Research, Institute of Health Management Research, Jaipur, India
2 Directorate of Medical, Health and Family Welfare Services, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur, India

Date of Submission27-Dec-2008
Date of Acceptance02-Nov-2009
Date of Web Publication19-Apr-2010

Correspondence Address:
Rajeev K Kumar
Institute of Health Management Research, 1, Prabhu Dayal Marg, Sanganer Airport, Jaipur
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: The Directorate of Health Services, Government of Madhya Pradesh,, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0970-0218.62554

Rights and Permissions

 

   Abstract 

Objective: The main objective of the study is to measure the satisfaction of OPD (Outpatient Department) patients in public health facilities of Madhya Pradesh in India. Materials and Methods: Data were collected from OPD patients through pre-structured questionnaires at public health facilities in the sampled eight districts of Madhya Pradesh. The data were analyzed using SPSS. Settings: Outpatient Departments of district hospital, civil hospital, community health centre, and primary health centre of the eight selected districts of Madhya Pradesh. Results: A total of 561 OPD patients were included in the study to know their perceptions towards the public health facilities, choosing health facility, registration process, basic amenities, perception towards doctors and other staff, perception towards pharmacy and dressing room services. It was found that most of the respondents were youth and having low level of education. The major reason of choosing the public health facility was inexpensiveness, infrastructure, and proximity of health facility. Measuring patient satisfaction were more satisfied with the basic amenities at higher health facilities compared to lower level facilities. It was also observed that the patients were more satisfied with the behavior of doctors and staff at lower health facilities compared to higher level facilities.


Keywords: Patient satisfaction, public health facilities, quality of care


How to cite this article:
Sodani PR, Kumar RK, Srivastava J, Sharma L. Measuring patient satisfaction: A case study to improve quality of care at public health facilities. Indian J Community Med 2010;35:52-6

How to cite this URL:
Sodani PR, Kumar RK, Srivastava J, Sharma L. Measuring patient satisfaction: A case study to improve quality of care at public health facilities. Indian J Community Med [serial online] 2010 [cited 2019 Nov 17];35:52-6. Available from: http://www.ijcm.org.in/text.asp?2010/35/1/52/62554



   Introduction Top


Patient satisfaction is one of the important goals of any health system, but it is difficult to measure the satisfaction and gauze responsiveness of health systems as not only the clinical but also the non-clinical outcomes of care do influence the customer satisfaction. [1] Patients' perceptions about health care systems seem to have been largely ignored by health care managers in developing countries. Patient satisfaction depends up on many factors such as: Quality of clinical services provided, availability of medicine, behavior of doctors and other health staff, cost of services, hospital infrastructure, physical comfort, emotional support, and respect for patient preferences. [2] Mismatch between patient expectation and the service received is related to decreased satisfaction. [3] Therefore, assessing patient perspectives gives them a voice, which can make public health services more responsive to people's needs and expectations. [4],[5]

In the recent past, studies on patient satisfaction gained popularity and usefulness as it provides the chance to health care providers and mangers to improve the services in the public health facilities. Patients' feedback is necessary to identify problems that need to be resolved in improving the health services. Even if they still do not use this information systematically to improve care delivery and services, this type of feedback triggers a real interest that can lead to a change in their culture and in their perception of patients. [6]

The present paper is based on a comprehensive study conducted at public health facilities in the State of Madhya Pradesh to measure patient satisfaction who have availed services at outdoor patient department, in-door patient department and diagnostics/investigative. The main objective of this paper is to share the findings on patients' satisfaction about various components of out-door patient department (OPD) services. In this study, the OPD is defined as the hospital's department where patients received diagnoses and/or treatment but did not stay overnight.


   Materials and Methods Top


The state is divided into eight administrative divisions. To have a representative sample of the State, one district has been identified from each of the division. The identified districts were: Vidisha, Morena, Gwalior, Indore, Jabalpur, Sidhi, Sagar and Ujjain. To select OPD patients from each district, a sample of OPD patients were drawn from the public health facilities, i.e., district hospital (DH), civil hospital (CH), community health centre (CHC), and primary health centre (PHC). From each of the selected district, one DH, one CH, one CHC and one PHC were identified. Thus, in all, 561 OPD patients were covered from 32 public health facilities of the state [Table 1].

To carry out the proper scientific study, a set of well structured questionnaire containing close-ended questions was developed. The questionnaire was pre-tested. The finalized questionnaire was translated into Hindi, the State language, for administering purposes. The questionnaire covered the information related to patient's socio-economic characteristics, patient's choice of health facility, registration process, perception towards availability of basic amenities, behavior of doctors and other staff, facilities available in pharmacy and dressing room. Data were collected with the help of trained field investigators during the months of September and October 2007. The state government facilitated data collection from various facilities. After collecting the data from various health facilities, data editing and cleaning were done before the data entry. The data were analyzed using the SPSS version 12.


   Results and Discussions Top


Characteristics of the OPD patients

It includes information on sex, age, and literacy level of the OPD patients. [Table 2] shows that 47% patients were males and rest 53% were females. The maximum number of respondents (45%) belongs to the age group of 16-30 years and minimum respondents (6%) to 0-15 year age group. The education level of the respondents was very poor as most of them were either illiterate (39%) or primary passed (18%).

Reasons for choosing the facility

Inexpensiveness and good infrastructure was one of the most cited reasons (83%) for choosing the public health facilities by the OPD patients. Majority of the patients (81%) said that the main source of information about the hospital was family members/relatives. More than half of the respondents reached the hospital on foot. The time taken to reach the hospital was less than 15 minutes for more than half of the respondents (58%). Almost all the respondents did not find any problem in locating the hospital (93%) or locating different departments within the hospital (87%). One of the major reasons for choosing the public health facility was unavailability of other health facilities in the area.

Registration process

Regarding the registration process, 64% OPD patients said the registration counter was over crowded. It was more observed at the higher level health facility (DH) compared with lower level health facilities (PHC). However, the patients were happy with the behavior of registration clerk at all the facilities [Table 3].

Basic amenities

It was observed that respondents were more satisfied with the basic amenities such as seating arrangement for the patients and attendants, cleanliness, fans, toilets, drinking water, and telephone facility at higher level facility i.e. district and civil hospitals as compared to community health center and primary health center. The main reason being the higher level facilities have better infrastructure than the lower health facilities.

[Table 4] shows the perception of OPD patients on availability of basic amenities in the studied public health facilities. More than half of the respondents (54%) found sitting arrangement adequate and 71% respondents found hospitals adequately cleaned. Most of the OPD patients were happy with the lighting arrangements at the higher facilities. Regarding toilet facility, 44% respondents said it was available and clean, but 49% respondents said it was available but dirty. More than half of the respondents (69%) reported that the drinking water facility was available while 56% of the respondents reported lack of telephone facility in hospitals.

Perception of OPD patients towards doctors

It was observed from the data that the waiting time for OPD patients at the higher level health facilities is more than the lower level health facilities, because of the high patient load at district and civil hospitals. Most of the patients (78%) at PHC said that they have to wait less than 10 minutes for the doctor whereas in case of DH, CH and CHC; 54%, 52%, and 51% patients respectively said so. Majority of the patients (above 85%) have observed that doctor's behavior was good at all the facilities and they also felt that the doctor has given adequate time to see the patients [Table 5].

Pharmacy

Out of 561 respondents, 433 had availed the pharmacy facility. Data revealed that the patients at lower level health facilities (CHC and PHC) were more satisfied with the queue system than at the higher level health facilities (DH and CH). Most of the OPD patients also perceived that the behavior of the pharmacist was good particularly at the higher level facilities (DH and CH). Behavior of pharmacist was either good or satisfactory for all the OPD patients. Regarding the quality of drugs, OPD patients were more happy at CHC and PHC as compared to DH and CH and the overall response to the quality of drugs was either good (64%) or satisfactory (33%) and only 3% considered it poor [Table 6].

Dressing room

Out of 561, only 131 respondents utilized the dressing room facility. Of these, 63% patients felt that the dressing room was over crowded. The problem of over crowding in dressing rooms was felt more by the patients at DH (69%) and CH (72%) than the CHC (63%) and PHC (37%). However, majority of the respondents (92%) were satisfied with the promptness in providing service at dressing rooms at all the health facilities. In all, most of the patients (73%) found the cleanliness of dressing room good. The cleanliness of highest level facilities (DH) is better than the lowest level facilities (PHC). Majority (82%) of the patients perceived the behavior of the dressing room staff as good. However, at DH level, only 62% OPD patients considered the behavior of dressing room staff good [Table 7]. The reason might be over crowding of the patients and the heavy patient load at higher level facilities.


   Conclusions Top


The study findings suggest that following measures may be taken by the policy makers and hospital administrators to increase the patient satisfaction at public health facilities: 1) Efforts should be made to reduce the patient load at the higher level facilities so that doctors and other staff can give more attention and time to the patients; 2) Efforts are also needed to strengthen infrastructure and human resources at the lower level health facilities. The findings of the present study can be utilized to improve the services at public health facilities of the state resulting in the more satisfaction of patients availing such public health facilities.


   Acknowledgement Top


Thanks are due to the Directorate of Health Services, Government of Madhya Pradesh for sponsoring the study. Thanks are also due to the Director, Institute of Health Management Research, Jaipur, for providing the opportunity to conduct the study. We also express our gratitude to the patients for providing their valuable time for interview.

 
   References Top

1.Agrawal D. Health sector reforms: Relevance in India. Indian J Community Med 2006;31:220-2.  Back to cited text no. 1      
2.Jenkinson C, Coulter A, Bruster S, Richards N, Chandola T. Patients' experiences and satisfaction with health care: Results of a questionnaire study of specific aspects of care. Qual Saf Health Care 2002;11:335-9.  Back to cited text no. 2  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
3.McKinley RK, Roberts C. Patient satisfaction with out of hours primary medical care. Qual Health Care 2001;10:23-8.  Back to cited text no. 3  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
4.World Health Organization. The World Health Report 2000-Health Systems: Improving Performance. Geneva: WHO, 2000.  Back to cited text no. 4      
5.Rao KD, Peters DH, Bandeen-Roche K. Towards patient-centered health services in India- a scale to measure patient perceptions of quality. Int J Qual Health Care 2006;18:414-21.  Back to cited text no. 5  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
6.Boyer L, Francois P, Doutre E, Weil G, Labarere J. Perception and use of the results of patient satisfaction surveys by care providers in a French teaching hospital. Int J Qual Health Care 2006;18:359-64.  Back to cited text no. 6  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6], [Table 7]


This article has been cited by
1 Satisfaction with traditional counter versus value-added services for prescription claims in a Malaysian Tertiary Hospital
Huan-Keat Chan,Nurul Amalina Shahabudin,Norazila Abdul Ghani,Mohamed Azmi Hassali
Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research. 2015; : n/a
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 A Study on Patient Satisfaction at a Multi Super Specialty Hospital in Delhi
P. R. Sodani,Kalpa Sharma
Hospital Topics. 2014; 92(1): 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 A cross-sectional study on patient satisfaction toward services received at rural health center, Chandigarh, North India
Authors of Document Galhotra, A., Sarpal, S.S., Gupta, S., Goel, N.
Annals of Tropical Medicine and Public Health. 2013;
[Pubmed]
4 Patient satisfaction survey of microbiological tests done in G.B. Pant Hospital
Aradhana Bhargava,Archana Thakur,Bibhabati Mishra,Juhi Taneja,Vinita Dogra,Poonam Loomba
International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance. 2012; 25(7): 555
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Patient satisfaction survey of microbiological tests done in G.B. Pant Hospital
Bhargava, A. and Thakur, A. and Mishra, B. and Taneja, J. and Dogra, V. and Loomba, P.
International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance. 2012; 25(7): 555-564
[Pubmed]
6 Client satisfaction and perceptions about quality of health care at a primary health centre of Delhi, India
Rasheed, N. and Arya, S. and Acharya, A. and Khandekar, J.
Indian Journal of Community Health. 2012; 24(3): 237-242
[Pubmed]
7 A study on status of client satisfaction in patients attending government health facilities in Agra District
Anand, D. and Kaushal, S.K. and Gupta, S.C.
Indian Journal of Community Health. 2012; 24(3): 209-214
[Pubmed]
8 Patientsę satisfaction with medical services in the Qassim area
Aldebasi, Y.H., Ahmed, M.I.
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2011; 5(4): 813-817
[Pubmed]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
                 

    

 
   Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
  Related articles
    Article in PDF (342 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
    Introduction
    Materials and Me...
    Results and Disc...
    Conclusions
    Acknowledgement
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed10191    
    Printed211    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded800    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 8    

Recommend this journal

  Sitemap | What's New | Feedback | Copyright and Disclaimer
  © 2007 - Indian Journal of Community Medicine | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
  Online since 15th September, 2007