HomeAboutusCurrent issuearchivesSearch articlesInstructions for authorsSubscription detailsAdvertise

  Login  | Users online: 20

   Ahead of print articles    Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size  


 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Table of Contents   
Year : 2008  |  Volume : 33  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 26-30
 

Occupational exposure to blood and body fluids among health care workers in a teaching hospital in Mumbai, India


Department of Community Medicine, Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College, Pune - 411 018, Maharashtra, India

Date of Submission23-Aug-2007
Date of Acceptance01-Dec-2007

Correspondence Address:
Amitav Banerjee
Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College, Pune - 411 018, Maharashtra
India
Login to access the Email id


DOI: 10.4103/0970-0218.39239

PMID: 19966992

Get Permissions

 

   Abstract 

Objective: Exposure to blood and body fluids is one of the hidden hazards faced by health care workers (HCWs). The objective of the present study was to estimate the incidence of such exposure in a teaching hospital. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study among a random sample of residents, interns, nurses and technicians ( n = 830) was carried out in a teaching hospital to estimate the incidence of exposure to blood and body fluids in the preceding 12-month period. Self-reported occurrence and the circumstances of the same were recorded by face-to-face interviews using a semi-structured questionnaire. Results: The response rate to the study was 89.76%. Occupational exposure to blood and body fluids in the preceding 12 months was reported by 32.75% of the respondents. The self-reported incidence was the highest among the nurses. Needle-stick injury was the most common mode of such exposures (92.21% of total exposures). Index finger and thumb were the commonest sites of exposure. Only 50% of the affected individuals reported the occurrence to concerned hospital authorities. Less than a quarter of the exposed persons underwent post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) against HIV, although the same was indicated in about 50% of the affected HCWs based on the HIV status of the source patient. Conclusions: Occupational exposure to blood and body fluids was a common occurrence in the study sample. There was gross under-reporting of such incidents leading to a lack of proper PEP against HIV in 50% of those in whom the same appeared to be indicated.


Keywords: Health care workers, needle-stick injury, occupational exposures


How to cite this article:
Singru SA, Banerjee A. Occupational exposure to blood and body fluids among health care workers in a teaching hospital in Mumbai, India. Indian J Community Med 2008;33:26-30

How to cite this URL:
Singru SA, Banerjee A. Occupational exposure to blood and body fluids among health care workers in a teaching hospital in Mumbai, India. Indian J Community Med [serial online] 2008 [cited 2014 Dec 28];33:26-30. Available from: http://www.ijcm.org.in/text.asp?2008/33/1/26/39239



   Introduction Top


Needle-stick injuries and cuts are the common occupational accidents exposing health care workers (HCWs) to blood and body fluids. These preventable injuries expose workers to over 20 different blood-borne pathogens [1] and result in an estimated 1000 infections per year, the most common being Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C and HIV. [2] According to World Health Report 2002, 2.5% of HIV cases among HCWs and 40% of Hepatitis B and C cases among HCWs worldwide are the result of occupational exposure. [3] Unlike developed countries, most developing countries may not have surveillance for occupational exposure to blood and body fluids, which precludes estimation of the exact magnitude of such accidents.

The present study was carried out to estimate incidence during the preceding 12 months of blood and body fluid exposures among HCWs in a teaching hospital, circumstances leading to such accidents and post-exposure actions taken by the HCWs.


   Materials and Methods Top


The study was carried out in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Mumbai, India. The metro is situated in the western coast of India and is the economic capital of the country, highly industrialized, with a comparative higher incidence of HIV infection as compared to the rest of the country. Written permission for conducting the study was taken from the hospital administrative authorities.

The HCWs included the following categories:

  • Resident doctors: 450
  • Interns: 300
  • Staff nurses: 755
  • Medical technicians: 45
  • Total: 1550


Out of the above HCWs, 250 resident doctors, 200 interns, 350 staff nurses and 30 medical technicians (total 830) were selected for the study by stratified random sampling. After explaining the purpose of the study, consent for participation was taken from each HCW.

Definition of occupational exposure

Accidental needle-stick injury was defined as a prick with a needle or other sharp object during use of the object for patient care. Accidental splash was defined as a splash of any body fluid from a patient onto the skin or mucous membrane of a HCW.

Measurement of occupational exposure

Self-reported occupational exposure to blood/body fluids was elicited for the past one year from each subject using a semi-structured study instrument, which was pre-tested in a pilot study and suitably modified. Data from the pilot study were not included in the main study. The HCW was asked to recall exposure to blood and body fluids in the preceding 12-month period. They were also queried about the type of accident, circumstances leading to the exposure and the body site of exposure. Information was also elicited on what they did after encountering such exposures regarding local toilet, notification, lab investigation and post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP). The responses to the questionnaire were collected from the subjects by face-to-face interviews by trained interviewers.


   Results Top


Response rate

Out of the 830 selected HCWs, 745 (238 resident doctors, 158 interns, 323 staff nurses and 26 medical technicians) agreed to participate in the study giving, a response rate of 89.76%.

Incidence of occupational exposure to blood and body fluids

The overall incidence of occupational exposure to blood and body fluids during the study period of one year was 32.75%. The incidence of accidental exposure to potential infectious material was the highest among the staff nurses at 39.63%, followed by interns at 37.34%, technicians at 26.92% and least among the resident doctors at 21.01%.

Type of accident leading to occupational exposure

This is shown in [Table - 1]. Most of the exposures (92.21%) were due to needle-stick injuries. The rest (7.79%) were due to splashing of body fluids/blood.

Procedure-wise distribution of exposure to blood and body fluids

Overall, re-capping of needles was the most hazardous procedure particularly among interns and staff nurses. Drawing blood samples, setting up IV lines and giving injections were the other hazardous procedures exposing the HCWs to potential infectious material in order of frequency. Among resident doctors, surgical operations and conduct of labour were the common circumstances leading to exposure to blood and body fluids.

Sites of exposure

The most common site of exposure was the non-dominant index finger (61.06%), followed by the non-dominant thumb (31.15%). Other less frequent sites were forearms (5.75%), mucosa/conjunctiva (1.23%) and legs (0.82%).

Washing of exposure site: [Table - 2] shows the category-wise practice of washing the exposure site with soap and water. Greater proportion of nurses observed the desirable practice of washing the site with soap and water (82.03%), as compared to interns and residents.

Notification: A much larger proportion of residents and interns (76% and 77.97%, respectively) notified the occurrence of occupational exposure as compared to only 26% of nurses reporting the incidence to the concerned hospital authority. This difference was statistically significant [Table - 3].

Exposure status of source patient: The source patient was HIV negative in 52.87% of the occupational exposures; in only 6.97% of the exposures, the source patient was HIV positive; in the rest (40.16%), the HIV status of the source patient was unknown.

Proportion of HCWs undergoing lab investigations category-wise: This is shown in [Table - 4]. Significantly higher proportion of residents and interns underwent lab investigations as compared to nursing staff. Overall, only 36.48% of the HCWs underwent lab investigations after occupational exposure to blood and body fluids.

Details of lab investigations: Immediate post-exposure ELISA for HIV was done in all those who underwent lab investigations. However, out of the total 89 HCWs who underwent ELISA post-exposure, 27 did not undergo ELISA at 12 weeks or later. Only 19 HCWs underwent test for HBsAG, as most (211), i.e., 86% had taken Hepatitis B vaccination. None of the HCWs tested HIV positive by ELISA. Four of the nurses who underwent testing for HBsAg were positive for Hepatitis B. However, there was insufficient evidence to link their Hepatitis B positive status to occupational exposure .

Number of HCWs taking PEP category-wise:
This is shown in [Table - 5]. Only 21.31% of the HCWs exposed to blood and body fluids took PEP for HIV (though the same was indicated in about 50% of the cases of exposure). The proportion of residents and interns (20% and 33.9%, respectively) who took PEP was greater than those of nurses (14.06%).


   Discussion Top


Self-reported occupational exposure to blood and body fluids in the preceding 12 months was fairly high, ranging from the lowest incidence of 21% among residents to more than 39% among the nurses. The present study showed the highest incidence of occupational exposure among nurses. It has been reported that nurses experience the majority of needle-stick injuries in the world including half of the exposures that occur in the US [4],[5] and 70% of exposures occurring in Canada. [6] Among junior doctors, interns had a higher incidence of exposure as compared to residents. This may be due to their inexperience in practical procedures. Clarke et al ., [7] in their study, found that the probability of ever having a needle-stick injury was inversely related to years of experience.

Majority of accidental exposures to blood and body fluids was due to needle-stick injuries and most of them were percutaneous. In developing countries, where the prevalence of HIV-infected patients is the highest in the world, the number of needle-stick injuries is also the highest. [8] In some regions of Africa and Asia, close to half of all Hepatitis B and C infections among HCWs are attributable to contaminated sharps. Factors surrounding the circumstances of the needle-stick injury, when combined, can increase the risk of HIV infection to 1 in 20 (or 5% risk). These factors include a deep injury, visible blood on the device, high viral titre status of the patient such as in newly infected patients or those in a terminal state, and the device being used to access an artery or a vein. [9]

Unreported needle-stick and sharp injuries are a serious problem and prevent injured HCWs from receiving PEP against HIV, which is shown to be 80% effective against HIV infection. [8] According to researchers, 40%-70% of all needle-stick injuries are unreported. [8] Without documentation, of the injury, the affected HCW is unlikely to receive worker's compensation benefits if later becoming infected with the HIV or other blood-borne pathogens.

Less than a quarter of the exposed HCWs took a course of PEP against HIV, though it appears that the same was indicated in about half of the affected HCWs. This low rate of PEP was due to under-reporting to concerned hospital authorities. Clarke et al ., [7] in their study, found that only 29% of exposed respondents reported the incident. Reasons for not reporting included: the source thought it to be non-infectious, insignificant exposure, too little time to report, already immunized for Hepatitis B, the outcome remaining unchanged by reporting, the exposure was not an emergency and not knowing how to report an exposure. These reasons accounted for 83% of the reasons given for not reporting.

The United States National Surveillance System for Health Care Workers (NaSH) identified six devices that are responsible for the majority of needle-stick and other sharp-related injuries. These are hypodermic needles (32%), suture needles (19%), winged steel needles (butterfly) (12%), scalpel blades, IV catheter stylets (96%) and phlebotomy needles (3%). [4] Percutaneous or needle-stick injuries contaminated with blood or body fluids pose the highest risk and cause the most common exposures among HCWs. [4] These blood-filled devices account for 59% of all NaSH reported and 90% of the HIV seroconversion documented by CDC. [4] The most common circumstances that cause injuries in NaSH hospitals involve hollow bore needles, which are the most risky because these needles can be filled with blood. Situations of injury include the following: manipulating the patient (26%), disposal (23%), collision with worker or sharps (10%), during clean-up (10%), accessing IV lines (6%) and re-capping needles (6%). [4]

The use of data collected about the nature of occupational exposures, needle-stick injuries and near-misses helps guide prevention at the unit or institutional level and helps make recommendations for new practices and devices for prevention and re-occurrence of injuries. In 2004, the CDC published a web-based resource: Workbook for Designing, Implementing and Evaluating a Sharps Injury Prevention Program. [4] The workbook describes the use of Root Cause Analysis, a process for identifying causal factors to use in needle-stick injury prevention, and suggests that the institution's needle-stick prevention committee ask key questions (What happened? How did it happen? Why did it happen? What can be done to prevent it from happening in the future?) to get at the "root" of situations resulting in injuries, and thus identifying areas for change. [4] By identifying why and how injuries occur in specific settings, interventions can be easily recognized and prioritized. Reporting injuries and documenting all blood-borne exposures are essential for having the evidence to analyze for prevention.

A number of studies have explored needle-stick injuries among HCWs. [10],[11],[12],[13],[14],[15],[16],[17],[18],[19],[20] Because of the differences between studies, it is not possible to quantitatively synthesize their results; nonetheless, some common themes emerge, such as - needle-stick injuries are common; needle-stick injuries are often under-reported and when levels of reporting have been examined, it is common for only a small proportion to be reported; and knowledge about needle-stick injuries and possible infection from blood-borne pathogens is often low and risks under-estimated.

The present study also reiterates the above themes, particularly the first two, namely that needle-stick injuries are a fairly common occurrence among HCWs and secondly that they are grossly under-reported. The incidence of exposure to blood and body fluids in the present study was measured by self-reporting on the part of the HCW. This may have led to inaccuracies in the true incidence due to recall bias.

To have a proper database on these injuries, developing countries should also develop surveillance systems for needle-stick injuries among HCWs. Legal measures are also indicated to address compensation for HCWs who contact blood-borne pathogens as an occupational hazard. All these would require proper notification, documentation and education of HCWs.


   Acknowledgements Top


The authors are grateful to Dr. (Mrs.) P. Subramanium, Prof. and Head, Department of PSM, K.J. Somaiya Medical College, Mumbai and Dr. (Mrs.) Daksha Pandit, Prof. and Head, Department of PSM, Lokmanya Tilak Municipal Medical College, Mumbai for all the help and guidance during the conduct of this study.

 
   References Top

1.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guidelines for infection control in health care personnel. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1998;19:445.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.International Health Care Worker Safety Center. Estimated Annual Number of U.S. Occupational Percutaneous Injuries and Mucocutaneous Exposures to Blood or Potentially Infective Biological Substances. Adv Exposure Prevent 1998;4:3.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.World Health Report. Reducing Risks, promoting healthy life. WHO: Geneva; 2002.  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Workbook for designing, implementing and evaluating a sharps injury prevention program . 2004. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/sharpssafety/pdf/WorkbookComplete.pdf.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Prüss-Üstün A, Rapiti E, Hutin Y. Sharps injuries: Global burden of disease from sharps injuries to health-care workers. World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland; 2003. Available from: http://www.who.int/peh/burden/9241562463/sharptoc.htm.  Back to cited text no. 5    
6.Canadian Center for Occupational Health and Safety (CCOHS). Needlestick injuries. 2000. Available from: http://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/diseases/needlestick_injuries.html.  Back to cited text no. 6    
7.Clarke SP, Rockett JL, Sloane DM, Aiken LH. Organizational climate, staffing and safety equipment as predictors of needlestick injuries and near misses in hospital nurses. Am J Infect Control 2002;30:207-16.  Back to cited text no. 7  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
8.Wilburn SQ. Needle and sharps injury prevention. Online J Issues in Nursing [Cited on 2004 Sep 30], Vol 89:3:Manuscript 4. [Last accessed on 2007 Mar 19] Available from http://nursingworld.org/ojin/topic25/tpc25_4.htm.  Back to cited text no. 8    
9.Cardo DM, Culver DH, Ciesielski CA, Srivastava PU, Marcus R, Abiteboul D, et al . A case-control study of HIV seroconversion in health care workers after percutaneous exposure. N Engl J Med 1997;337:1485-90.  Back to cited text no. 9  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
10.Memish ZA, Almuneef M, Dillon J. Epidemiology of needlestick and sharps injuries in a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia. Am J Infect Control 2002;30:234-41.  Back to cited text no. 10  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
11.Newsom DH, Kiwanuka JP. Needle-stick injuries in an Ugandan teaching Hospital. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 2002;96:517-22.  Back to cited text no. 11  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
12.Shiao J, Guo L, McLaws ML. Estimation of the risk of blood pathogens to health care workers after a needle stick injury in Taiwan. Am J Infect Control 2002;30:15-20.  Back to cited text no. 12  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
13.Abu-Gad HA, Al-Turki KA. Some epidemiological aspects of needle stick injuries among the hospital health care workers: Eastern province. Saudi Arabia. Eur J Epidemiol 2001;17: 401-7.  Back to cited text no. 13    
14.Karstaedt AS, Pantanowitz L. Occupational exposure of interns to blood in an area of high HIV seroprevalence. S Afr Med J 2001;91:57-61.  Back to cited text no. 14  [PUBMED]  
15.Puro V, DeCarli G, Petrosillo N, Ippolito G. Risk of exposure to blood borne infection for Italian Health Care Workers, by job category and work area. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2001;22:206-10.  Back to cited text no. 15    
16.Alzahrani AJ, Vallely PJ, Klapper PE. Needlestick injuries and hepatitis B virus vaccination in health care workers. Commun Dis Public Health 2000;3:217-8.  Back to cited text no. 16  [PUBMED]  
17.Varma M, Mehta G. Needle stick injuries among medical students. J Indian Med Assoc 2000;98:436-8.  Back to cited text no. 17  [PUBMED]  
18.Ippolito G, Puro V, Petrosillo N, De Carli G. Surveillance of occupational exposure to blood borne pathogens in health care workers: The Italian national experience. Euro Surveill 1999;4:33-6.  Back to cited text no. 18  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
19.Resnic F, Noerdlinger MA. Occupational exposure among medical students and house staff at a New York City medical center. Arch Intern Med 1995;155:75-80.  Back to cited text no. 19    
20.Kermode M, Jolley D, Langkham B, Thomas M, Crofts N. Occupational exposure to blood and risk of blood borne virus infection among health care workers in rural North Indian settings. Am J Infect Control 2005;33:34-41.  Back to cited text no. 20    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table - 1], [Table - 2], [Table - 3], [Table - 4], [Table - 5]


This article has been cited by
1 Hepatitis B vaccination status and Needle-stick and Sharps-related Injuries among medical school students in Nepal: a cross-sectional study
Suraj Bhattarai,Smriti KC,Pranil MS Pradhan,Sami Lama,Suman Rijal
BMC Research Notes. 2014; 7(1): 774
[Pubmed]
2 Occupational Exposure to HIV: Perceptions and Preventive Practices of Indian Nursing Students
Siddharudha Shivalli
Advances in Preventive Medicine. 2014; 2014: 1
[Pubmed]
3 Implementing a Sharps Injury Reduction Program at a Charity Hospital in India
Joshua J. Gramling,Nancy Nachreiner
Workplace Health & Safety. 2013; 61(8): 339
[Pubmed]
4 Awareness About Needle Stick Injures and Sharps Disposal: A Study Conducted at Army College of Dental Sciences
Sukhvinder Bindra,K. V. Ramana Reddy,Anubhav Chakrabarty,Kirti Chaudhary
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery. 2013;
[Pubmed]
5 Community health care workers’ risk perception of occupational exposure to HIV in Ibadan, south-west Nigeria
Adamo A. Akinboro,Olabisi P. Adejumo,Comfort A. Onibokun,Eunice A. Olowokere
African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine. 2012; 4(1)
[Pubmed]
6 Needlestick Injuries, Short Peripheral Catheters, and Health Care Worker Risks :
Lynn Hadaway
Journal of Infusion Nursing. 2012; 35(3): 164
[VIEW]
7 Prevalence of injuries and reporting of accidents among health care workers at the University Hospital of the West Indies
Kurt Vaz, Donovan McGrowder, Tazhmoye Crawford, Ruby Lisa Alexander-Lindo, Rachael Irving
International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health. 2010; 23(2): 133
[VIEW]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
                 

    

 
   Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
  Related articles
    Article in PDF (99 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
    Introduction
    Materials and Me...
    Results
    Discussion
    Acknowledgements
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed5147    
    Printed182    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded666    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 7    

Recommend this journal

  Sitemap | What's New | Feedback | Copyright and Disclaimer
  © 2007 - Indian Journal of Community Medicine | Published by Medknow
  Online since 15th September, 2007