HomeAboutusEditorial BoardCurrent issuearchivesSearch articlesInstructions for authorsSubscription detailsAdvertise

  Login  | Users online: 1077

   Ahead of print articles    Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size  


 
COMMENTS ON BOOK REVIEW Table of Contents   
Year : 2007  |  Volume : 32  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 94
 

Reviewer's Reply


Department of Community Medicine, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India

Date of Web Publication6-Aug-2009

Correspondence Address:
A J Singh
Department of Community Medicine, PGIMER, Chandigarh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

 



How to cite this article:
Singh A J. Reviewer's Reply. Indian J Community Med 2007;32:94

How to cite this URL:
Singh A J. Reviewer's Reply. Indian J Community Med [serial online] 2007 [cited 2019 Jun 19];32:94. Available from: http://www.ijcm.org.in/text.asp?2007/32/1/94/53425


In the 21th century focus in epidemiology should be on the latest. Burden of disease. DAILY, DFLE etc. Have been with us for more than a decade but chapter 40 fails to elaborate on these. Chapter 31 realted to MCH mortality, does not address the issues like standardized death rates. The mortality diagram has wrong labeling of D. M. W (P. 465). Moreover, definition of early and late fetal death rates mentions 'pregnancy among the female population' (as of now only females get pregnant !). These are several other omissions and errors such as RCT does not figure in the text or in the index, theory of causation has not been described, the forumulae for specificity, positive and negative predictive values are all wrong (P 553), definition of epizootic is missing, the tails of the normal curve appear to touch the baseline (P 880). It fact in can also be used for more than two attributes.

As far as historical developments are concerned, the year of industrial revolution in England is mentioned as 1950, is obviously wrong (P 17). How do authors explain that 'Profile of Modern Medicine' includes only Public Health etc. And nothing about fails to enlighten the readers why, when how, and where the term 'Community Medicine' ' evolved (p 27-28).

The table on cancer is more of a theroretical nature. The magnitude in term of age, sex, and time-wise trends of cancer in India are not given. Preventive genetics certainly has a scope of including at least one paragraph each on 'Human Genome Project', 'Cloning' and related ethical aspects.

Leptospirosis is dealt only briefly, its occurrence in India, incubation period, laboratory diagnosis or treatment is not mentioned (p 332). The chapter 10 on 'human population and its control' gives wrong notions about family welfare­more towards coercion (p 148). It needs to be changed (remember excesses in 1975 emergency!). The next chapter titled 'arthropod population and its control' also needs to be changed.

Chapter organization, coherence, sequence is also not proper. Section III Biological Environment and Health gives just a table of zoonosis and then next page onwards it is chapter 10 dealing with human population, biological environment zoonoses, human populaiton, arthropods and then a special treatment to 'rate population'-this does not give a coherent picture.




 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
                 

    

 
   Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
    Article in PDF (41 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  



 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed596    
    Printed48    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded37    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

  Sitemap | What's New | Feedback | Copyright and Disclaimer
  © 2007 - Indian Journal of Community Medicine | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
  Online since 15th September, 2007