HomeAboutusEditorial BoardCurrent issuearchivesSearch articlesInstructions for authorsSubscription detailsAdvertise

  Login  | Users online: 644

   Ahead of print articles    Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size  


 
ARTICLE Table of Contents   
Year : 2005  |  Volume : 30  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 94-96
 

Knowledge and Practice among General Practitioners of Jamnagar city Regarding Animal Bite


Department of Community Medicine, M.P. Shah Medical College, Jamnagar, India

Date of Web Publication7-Aug-2009

Correspondence Address:
S Bhalla
Department of Community Medicine, M.P. Shah Medical College, Jamnagar
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0970-0218.42859

Rights and Permissions

 



How to cite this article:
Bhalla S, Mehta J P, Singh A. Knowledge and Practice among General Practitioners of Jamnagar city Regarding Animal Bite. Indian J Community Med 2005;30:94-6

How to cite this URL:
Bhalla S, Mehta J P, Singh A. Knowledge and Practice among General Practitioners of Jamnagar city Regarding Animal Bite. Indian J Community Med [serial online] 2005 [cited 2019 Oct 14];30:94-6. Available from: http://www.ijcm.org.in/text.asp?2005/30/3/94/42859



   Introduction Top


Rabies encephalitis, both human and animal continue plague this country even after introduction of preventive vaccines more than a century ago. According to a latest WHO estimate about 50,000 human deaths due to rabies is reported from every year world wide, out of which 30,000 are from India alone [2] . At the dawn of 21st century we have achieved treatments progress in many spheres including science and technology, information technology, agriculture, satellite communication, etc. Unfortunately we still have highest number of deaths due to rabies, ironically a disease preventable by modern prophylactic measures.

General practitioner's (GPs) constitute an important source of medical care in Jamnagar city and approached for antirabies treatment by the victims of animal bites. The antirabies treatment viz., post-exposure prophylaxis is a life saving treatment in definite rabid animal bite. It has three main components viz., wound treatment (1/3), antirabies vaccine (1/3), antirabies serum+advice (1/3) and it should be timely and appropriately given. Hence we conducted our study with the following objectives to document the knowledge of general practitioners in treatment of animal bite patients to know the preventive measures used by general practitioners in cases of animal bite.


   Material and Methods Top


The study was done in Jamnagar city in April 2001. The study population composed of 100 GP's comprising of 40 M.B.B.S. doctors & 60 others (B.A.M.S., RMP). They were randomly selected from the Jamnagar city, having a population of 3.5 lacs.

The GP's were approached at their clinics or nursing homes by PG's in Community Medicine and Pharmacology at the end of their practice hours to minimize interruption to their practice. They were provided with a questionnaire to fill up after proper briefing, subsequently they were interviewed for some additional information where ever required.

Profile of GP's:- Mean age of GP's was 40 yrs (range 30-70 yrs); the average duration of practice was 19 yrs for M.B.B.S. (range 2-40) and all of them were males. The average duration of practice for others (B.A.M.S., RMP) was 19.34 yrs and all of them were males. On an average each of them examined about 5 cases of animal bites per month. The most common animal bites were of dogs, pigs and rarely jackals & horses.


   Results Top


Knowledge about various aspects of rabies was comparatively better amongst M.B.B.S. doctors.[Table 1]

On being asked if rabies could be transmitted by other than dog bite, 58% of the total doctors were of the view that it can be transmitted by blood transfusion also, 24%- STD, 34%­Contact, 22%- Faeco-oral, 26%- Sputum, 38% Perinatal.

Most (95%) of M.B.B.S., and 66.6% of others practiced cleaning of wound as FIRST AID for animal bite. The difference between the two was statistically significant. 15% of M.B.B.S. and 50% of others "dressed the wound".

Dettol and Savlon were the most preferred antiseptics used by the general practitioners (30%), followed by Betadine (19%). TT was used by 30% M.B.B.S. doctors as compared to 50% other doctors.

Knowledge ragarding scientific concepts of NTV (Nervous tissue vaccine) and CCV (Cell culture vaccine) was very poor among general practitioners. Almost all preferred Rabipur (Purified Chick Embryo Vaccine) or Verorab (Purified Vero cell Vaccine). After explaining them that Verorab and Rabipur were cell culture vaccine we got only 45% M.B.B.S. and 10% from others the correct schedule of CCV-Post exposure probhylaxis. The difference was statistically significant. Their knowledge regarding schedule of NTV and CCV pre-exposure prophylaxis was very poor. Though they knew that vaccine that is given at Govt. hospitals, CHC's & PHC's running antirabies clinics is given on anterior abdominal wall but they did not know that it is 5% BPL inactivated nervous tissue vaccine.

Their knowledge ragarding categorization of animal bites in different classes was very poor. Nobody knew about immunoglobulin or sera and they are not at all using them for treating patients.

[Table 2] reveals that M.B.B.S. Doctors (90%) were more knowledgeable about intramuscular (I.M.) as correct route compared to others (60%) for administration of CCV (Verorab, Rabipur), the difference between two was statistically significant.

M.B.B.S. Doctors (60%) knew about Deltoid as a correct site for administration of CCV as compared to Others (33%) and the difference between the two was statistically significant. While majority, 56% preferred gluteus as a site of administration of CCV that is not generally advisable.

Majority of the doctors were of the view that there is no need to re-vaccinate in previously vaccinated patient within three months, if he or she gets an animal bite.


   Discussion Top


In our study the average duration of private practice was 19 yrs for M.B.B.S. and 19-34 yrs for others. All of them were males. Overall knowledge about antirabic treatment and practice by GP's in Jamnagar city was very poor. All the doctors were aware that dog is the major source for spread of rabies in human population which was 98.3% in another study in Amritsar Medical College [5] . The most commonly biting animals were dogs, pigs in our study while in another study they were dogs, rats, cats, monkeys and horses in Karnataka [1] .

Regarding knowledge about wild animals like mongoose, jackals being reservoirs of infection of rabies only 24.3% of the total doctors had this in our study. This was comparatively better than the study done in Amritsar city only 11% of total doctors knew about reservoirs of rabies [5] .

About 58% of the total doctors were of the view that it can also be transmitted by blood transfusion, 38%-perinatal, 34%­contact, 24%- STD, and 22% by faeco-oral route in our study, while in another study in north India about 21.6% doctors were of the view that oro-faecal route is also one of the route of transmission [5] .

Majority of the M.B.B.S. (95%) and only 66.6% of others preferred wound toilet as first aid for animal bite. Dettol and Savlon (38%) were most preferred antiseptics being used by GP's followed by Betadine (19%), while is study done in Bangalore city dettol was again the most preferred antiseptic used by private practitioner's 1 . In our study 36% of GP's "dressed the wound" as compared to 20% in study done in Bangalore city 1 while in another study in Amritsar [6] 16.5% of total doctors were in favour of bandaging the wound which is contraindicated as this may facilitate entry of the virus.

Knowledge of respond NTV and CCV was very poor amongst both groups. All preferred Rabipur (PCEV) or Verorab (PVRV) nobody is using HDCV 1 and NTV. While in another study in Bangalore city though widely preferred ARB was Verorab but some of them were also using HDCV. In another study done by Depts. of Pharmacology and Anaesthesia in Amritsar Medical College widely preferred ARV was Rabipur [6] .

Only 24% of the total doctors gave us the correct schedule of post-exposure prophylaxis only after explaining to them that Verorab or Rabipur which they were prescribing is cell culture vaccine where as in another study done in Bangalore city, only 11% of the PMP's knew about the correct schedule of CCV post-exposure prophylaxis [1] . In our study only 4% of total doctors knew about correct pre-exposure prophylaxis of CCV while in another study done in Haryana by Community Medicine dept. P.G.I. Chandigarh 18.8% of health care providers were aware of it [7] .

Regarding route and site of administration of CCV (Rabipur or Verorab) in our study 72% of the total doctors were aware of the correct route of administration (I.M.) and 44% of total were aware of correct site of administration (Deltoid) while in another study done at Medical College, Amritsar only 43.7% of total doctors knew about the correct route and site of administration of CCV [6] .

In our study 56% of the total doctors had administered the vaccine in gluteal region while in another study done at M.K.C.G. Medical college Behrampur 68% had administered the vaccine in gluteal region [4] . In our study nobody knew about the serum administration in class III bites while in another study done by Community medicine dept. Amritsar 38.3% of the total were aware about the serum administration in class III bites 5 . Regarding vaccination practice in previously vaccinated patients within three months' 46% of total opined of no vaccination while 26% of total opined of again complete course of CCV in animal bite patients.


   Conclusion Top


No doubt, knowledge and practice regarding animal bites are comparatively better amongst M.B.B.S. doctors than others (RMP, BAMS) but there is an apparent lack of awareness among doctors regarding the appropriate management of animal bite wound and vaccine administration. CMEs and re­orientation programmes should be designed to highlight the guidelines given by WHO regarding treatment of animal bites. Persistence in following these guidelines by the doctors will go a long way in prevention of human rabies.

 
   References Top

1.Sudarshan M.K., A study of antirabic treatment practice by private medical practitioners in Bangalore city-IJPSM Vol 26, 1 & 2, 1995, pg 45-48.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.WHO technical report series 8th report 1992.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Rabies, Parks Textbook of preventive and social medicine, 207-217, 1997  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Panda R.M., Satpathy D.M., Sahani N.C., et al, A study on antirabies treatment practiced by general practitioners in Behrampur Town (unpublished) presented in APCRICON­2000 second national conference on rabies at Bangalore.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Jasleen, Padda AS et al A study of the assessment of training needs of the doctors, working in various Health facilities in Amritsar Distt. Regarding the management of animal bite cases. From souvenir APRICON 2001-3rd National Conf. on Rabies (68-69).  Back to cited text no. 5    
6.Goyal P, Sharma G et al, A comparative study of trends in the immediate management of animal bite wound in a teaching hospital in north India and at the peripheral level. From souvenir in APRICON 2001 3rd National Conf. On Rabies (67-68).  Back to cited text no. 6    
7.Prasad VS et al, Animal bite management practices-A survey of health care providers in rural haryana. From souvenir in APRICON 2001 3rd National Conf. On Rabies.  Back to cited text no. 7    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
                 

    

 
   Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
    Article in PDF (147 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Introduction
    Material and Methods
    Results
    Discussion
    Conclusion
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1876    
    Printed66    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded224    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

  Sitemap | What's New | Feedback | Copyright and Disclaimer
  © 2007 - Indian Journal of Community Medicine | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
  Online since 15th September, 2007